Adam Cochran (adamscochran.eth) Profile picture
Jun 17, 2023 12 tweets 4 min read Read on X
1/12

Ok, one last bullish BlackRock tweet to round out the weekend.

People don't realize that BlackRock really made the gold market as we know it today.

Pre-BlackRock it was a $1T market.

Now it's about $13T.

So how did they do it? Image
2/12

BlackRock has an army of advisors around the world who receive commission for pushing their products.

And while they've got a lot of brands for their funds, they are most known for "iShares" which offers 3 of the 5 largest gold ETFs in the world.
3/12

BlackRock has tools to let its advisors earn a 3% advisory fee on the products they sell, as well as to add on custom advisory fees.

Depending on the jurisdiction of the offering and advisor, there can also be trailing fees. Image
4/12

But in most places the fees are for new products sold.

And, due to various regulations can be more lucrative for alternative assets than standard shares.

But when BlackRock introduced their gold product, they began to add it to their model portfolios for advisors. Image
5/12

Advisors, eager to push the product and get commission on a new asset class began to tell Boomers that gold was the perfect component to round out a portfolio and hedge against inflation and other risks.

This led to a boon in gold investment demand. Image
6/12

While much of global demand for gold is still purpose driven (Jewelry and tech) this push grew the investment sector of demand to almost 25%, which led to a second order effect of increasing the amount of gold central banks were buying. Image
7/12

Because people valued gold, central banks in turn valued gold and rapidly increased demand for it.

All driven from this push. Image
8/12

Gold had exchange traded products prior to this - in fact as far back as 1961 there was a gold ETF in Canada.

And, State Street launched their SPDR gold ETF in 2004, which is the largest of all the gold ETFs.
9/12

But BlackRock through its army of advisors pushed the narrative that gave gold broader legitimacy in a portfolio.

It's network told millions of users that you *needed* gold to have a well balanced financial safety net.
10/12

After doing this for a two decades, we now find that young wealth managers and economists who have climbed to seats in central banks and sovereign wealth funds, view the "gold as portfolio safety" narrative as a no-brainer.
11/12

The same will hold true with crypto.

We have existing non-US ETFs and US ETPs.

BlackRock will arm advisors to educate millions of consumers on allocating X% of their portfolio to crypto and change the narrative entirely.
12/12

Then as the dollar declines, and a new generation of wealth managers, bankers and economists who grew up in the digital era ascend to the chairs of central banks - where do you think they will turn to for reserves?

What will they invest the future of their country in? Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Adam Cochran (adamscochran.eth)

Adam Cochran (adamscochran.eth) Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @adamscochran

Jan 30
1/23

This is WILD.

A *HUGE* fuck-up in the Trump DoJ strategy means Luigi will:

* Not face the death penalty

* Technically NOT even face a formal "murder" charge AT ALL?!

All because Pam Bondi cared more about political theatrics than the law.

Let me explain:
2/23

In the State of New York, the charge of murder is § 125.25.

It:

* Does NOT allow for a death penalty

* Does not allow life without parole

* Charges 15 - 25 years.

LWOP (life without parole) requires § 125.27, it requires one of these aggravating factors: Image
3/23

Last January, when Trump took power, he signed EO 14164, requiring the DoJ to pursue the death penalty where possible.

He specifically made a media push about the Luigi Mangione case. Image
Read 21 tweets
Jan 29
1/7

This is Kenneth Chesebro.

The MOST important figure in the Fulton case.

He was the lawyer who designed the scheme.

He was:

-deposed in Fulton

-pled guilty

-told ALL the details about Trump’s plots.

These DIRECTLY dispute Trump’s current Fulton claims: Image
Image
2/7

Kenneth was responsible first and foremost for arranging the fake electorate scheme.

He admitted:

* He knew Trump did NOT win the election.

* Trump knew it.

* They planned to use it regardless of election outcome.

* He came up with the false claim that it was standard practice to cover-up this plot.Image
3/7

Legally for the fake elector scheme to work, there *HAD TO* be an active lawsuit in each of those states contesting the election.

Both Cheesebro admitted the Sidney Powell case was that filing for Georgia.

Sidney Powell confessed the Fulton Georgia case was fraudulent, and pled guilty.Image
Read 8 tweets
Jan 29
1/18

Here’s my fact check on EVERY one of Trump/MAGA claims regarding Fulton:

1) “Trump has the power to seize paper ballots”

No.

State infrastructure and vote archives have specific protections (see Miles’ post below). Paper ballots are supposed to be the untouched records we compare against.

Taking them means any evidence he would have is now tainted.

It is also likely a criminal act.
2/18

2) “Trump has proof the election was stolen!”

No.

In fact, we have:

* His voice recorded on the phone telling Kemp to “find” him 11,000 votes because he lost.

* Him in multiple conversations with other Republicans admitting he lost (cited in Jack Smith case)

* Him in conversations with other Republicans admitting he knew there was no issue with the voting machines (Jack Smith case)

* Him in writing planning a plot to seize voting machines preemptively, before he claimed any issue. (Barr step down)

* His own lawyers in their election fraud cases, admitting on sworn record, that there was no evidence.
3/18

3) “Trump wasn’t fairly heard in his cases”

No.

MAGA claims all cases were dismissed solely on standing, but that’s not true.

Even when he lacked standing courts often still reviewed the merits of the case.

They didn’t have any. Image
Image
Read 18 tweets
Jan 24
1/12

Frame by frame breakdown of this MURDER shows ICE is lying!

-ICE had ALREADY disarmed the man before shooting.

-The man NEVER drew his gun.

At the 0:06 second mark we see the man’s hands on the ground covered in large gloves.

His hands are empty. Image
2/12

At 00:15 one of the agents begins to pistol whip the man in the head.

Showing the orientation of the man’s body and how his hands were NO WHERE near his waist. Image
Image
3/12

At 00:13 we can see the man is on his knees.

An officer in a gray jacket is pulling up his shirt.

You can see the gun in his waistband at 00:16 Image
Image
Read 24 tweets
Jan 16
DHS deleted this one because:

-The family was driving home and got blocked.

-ICE deployed flashbangs and tear gas INSIDE the car.

-The 6-month old child stopped breathing and had to be rushed to hospital.

DHS did NO investigation & rushed to lie to defend the officers. Image
I've verified from prior reporting and 911 call log data the location where ICE tear gassed a 6-month old child:

The 600 block of 23rd Avenue North in Minneapolis.

An entirely residential area.

It did NOT take place at the Whipple Building protest like MAGA has suggested. Image
It is also worth noting multiple people HAVE been blocked in at the Whipple building protests, as a low income Section 42 housing complex is on the edge of the Federal complex and must drive through the complex to get in/out: Image
Read 4 tweets
Jan 14
1/24

As someone writing a book on Epstein’s crimes, I try and validate all claims I hear, and only talk about them when I’ve proven or disproven them.

I’ve not yet commented on Sascha Barros/Riley’s claims because they are harder than most to verify.

Here is where I’m at:
2/24

First, I believe Sascha has absolutely experienced abuse.

In investigating these cases, you do learn to hear that pain in a victims voice.

But, due to the nature of trauma, experiencing abuse and accurately retelling it, are not always the same thing.
3/24

Let’s start with what’s clear:

Sascha’s claims about being adopted in the late 1970s by William Kyle Riley, are accurate.

Sascha also has done military service, although I did have trouble tracking down some specific claims about that service. Image
Image
Read 24 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(