Ok, one last bullish BlackRock tweet to round out the weekend.
People don't realize that BlackRock really made the gold market as we know it today.
Pre-BlackRock it was a $1T market.
Now it's about $13T.
So how did they do it?
2/12
BlackRock has an army of advisors around the world who receive commission for pushing their products.
And while they've got a lot of brands for their funds, they are most known for "iShares" which offers 3 of the 5 largest gold ETFs in the world.
3/12
BlackRock has tools to let its advisors earn a 3% advisory fee on the products they sell, as well as to add on custom advisory fees.
Depending on the jurisdiction of the offering and advisor, there can also be trailing fees.
4/12
But in most places the fees are for new products sold.
And, due to various regulations can be more lucrative for alternative assets than standard shares.
But when BlackRock introduced their gold product, they began to add it to their model portfolios for advisors.
5/12
Advisors, eager to push the product and get commission on a new asset class began to tell Boomers that gold was the perfect component to round out a portfolio and hedge against inflation and other risks.
This led to a boon in gold investment demand.
6/12
While much of global demand for gold is still purpose driven (Jewelry and tech) this push grew the investment sector of demand to almost 25%, which led to a second order effect of increasing the amount of gold central banks were buying.
7/12
Because people valued gold, central banks in turn valued gold and rapidly increased demand for it.
All driven from this push.
8/12
Gold had exchange traded products prior to this - in fact as far back as 1961 there was a gold ETF in Canada.
And, State Street launched their SPDR gold ETF in 2004, which is the largest of all the gold ETFs.
9/12
But BlackRock through its army of advisors pushed the narrative that gave gold broader legitimacy in a portfolio.
It's network told millions of users that you *needed* gold to have a well balanced financial safety net.
10/12
After doing this for a two decades, we now find that young wealth managers and economists who have climbed to seats in central banks and sovereign wealth funds, view the "gold as portfolio safety" narrative as a no-brainer.
11/12
The same will hold true with crypto.
We have existing non-US ETFs and US ETPs.
BlackRock will arm advisors to educate millions of consumers on allocating X% of their portfolio to crypto and change the narrative entirely.
12/12
Then as the dollar declines, and a new generation of wealth managers, bankers and economists who grew up in the digital era ascend to the chairs of central banks - where do you think they will turn to for reserves?
What will they invest the future of their country in?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
$20M buy back under these prices to capture back the token before the L2 launch and revenue distribution is healthy for the DAO and means new tokens for incentives on the L2.
Even the growth in frxETH due to it having the top LSD yield is underpriced.
3/4
Frax is scrappy, they keep launching forks of other projects with tweaks that re-enforce their own ecosystem, and are the only non-fiat stable since DAI to reach the $1B mcap amount.
They moved fast and just kept clawing their way up hill.
Heard from a friend that the rumors in the DC fundraising circles are that the Biden team wants to shake up some chairs/cabinet positions in the finance sector to take the heat for the economy before the next election.
Yellen tops the list.
2/4
But apparently plenty of big ticket donors have mentioned Gensler as well.
Even ones who agreed with his stance on crypto are "embarrassed" by his approach.
Starting to look like Warren, Yellen and Gensler brought down the hammer too hard for even their own party.
3/4
I would have guessed both Powell or Yellen would be on the chopping block.
But Gensler's lack of professionalism is rubbing his own party the wrong way, and so tides are turning.
If we keep highlighting the absurdity of his approach he may get reigned in.
Tether backing breakdown from Bloomberg based on the '21 docs:
-Included extensive amounts of Chinese Paper (basically short term loans to Chinese companies)
-Included a "sizeable loan" to Celsius Network.
2/12
-Tether also made extensive third party loans
-And was mostly banked by small regional banks in the Bahamas.
3/12
-Tether denied it's exposure to Chinese Paper during a phase when Chinese paper was trading at a steep discount, but that would align with these documents.
-Not a big impact to the $XRP case.
-Decently positive for $ETH.
-Nuance puts Gensler in a corner.
Let's recap the Hinman speech and I'll explain why this is damning for Gensler's position!
2/25
"But Adam! This is old and was when ETH was PoW!!!!"
We'll get to that - but, remember, this is still important because it was the last time the SEC made any material effort to clarify security regulations in their relation to digital assets.
3/25
Hinman's guidance in his speech certainly went beyond the scope of Howey by attempting to understand the nuanced intent of users vs investors - as well as trying to ask the question of 'morphing' this concept of can something be a security and then later not a security.