1. Report not yet confirmed by all trusted sources that Ukraine has continued to advance in the #Orikhiv region with another well-coordinated attack that likely drove the Russians from #Platykhatky and put the settlement in grey zone category.
2. The Ukrainian force is reported to have again delivered infantry in APCs that quickly withdrew and the battle was and covered with Ukrainian tanks in an overwatch role. Ukraine deployed smoke screen that because #Pyatykhatky is a low area kept the area in smoke concealing
3. an attacking Ukrainian force from east of #Lobkove. At the same time the Ukrainian forces in the forest to the west of the settlement fixed the Russians so that the other attacking force could reach the settlement and begin to engage in street fighting.
4. Ukrainians then advanced on the settlement from the forest. At the same time Ukrainian rocket artillery fired mines, possibly German AT2s that can be deployed with HIMARS that delayed the Russian ground counterattack. As Russian artillery fired
5. barrages, Ukrainian forces withdrew to the forest and when Russian rocket artillery fell back to rearm the Ukrainian forces in the forest again advance to the attack and with the force attacking from the east forced the Russians into a
6. tactical retreat turning the #Platykhatky settlement from Russian-held to a grey zone that may likely be reported as Ukrainian held soon.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1. My initial thought about the @washingtonpost article regarding alleged FBI stonewalling POTUS #45's Jan 6 investigation, was that I wondered if DOJ approved discussions with the reporters. Discussing an ongoing investigation without authority can be career
2. ending for violating DOJ rules. It could also be referred to OPR for past and present prosecutors. Here's how @CarolLeonnig and @byaaroncdavis described the DOJ interviews.
3. I used to have a personal inside joke about my late brother when he was at DOJ that his business card should read "DOJ Official Speaking Under Condition of Anonymity." The point is, to me, this sounds like the 4th floor may have authorized it. Why?
1. I'm not an expert on classified material and have never held a clearance but life brought me to where I have become familiar with the issues starting in the 1990s due to my brother's work at the DOJ that involved our most protected secrets.
2. I have been pondering the Trump indictment and I believe another shoe may soon fall. Several of the materials Trump purloined were SCI. When POTUS gets a SCI document, somebody brought it. That person is logged when they accessed it and that log is used for mole hunts.
3. I checked the indictment, and the conspiracy charge only relates to the obstruction charges. So who gave him the SCI documents and failed to return them to the system?
During the final weeks of the lawless Trump administration we witnessed him park an odd collection of
1. Ukraine turned its #southernfront focus west. It had recently been focused on #VelykaNovosilka circled on the right. Today Ukraine attacked to the west at #Lobkove near Orkiv circled on the left. The attack involved another well-planned and executed
2. combined arms attack in which Ukraine, with five IFVs, two tanks and multiple APCs deployed units of dismounted infantry that attacked a forested area occupied by multiple small Russian units in fighting positions. Ukrainian infantry units quickly defeated the multiple
3. Russian units securing the forested area to use as the stage for a further attack on #Pyatykhatky. Russian forces finally countered supported by Grad rocket batteries that were answered by Ukrainian counter-battery fire that forced Russian batteries to respond resulting in
1. Todd Blanche may regret winning the motion to remand the NY state Trump criminal case to state court. To win he needs a ruling that Donald Trump was an officer of the United States. If he does, here's something that will come from that, something Blanch and Trump may regret.
2. The removal statute that Blanch used to take the state prosecution away from NY state court and put it in the SDNY, 28 USC 1441, requires that the former president be an "officer of the United States." I personally don't think case law supports it but Trump claims that he is.
3. There are statutes that Trump can be charged with that include punishments that could ban him from holding office. I hear repeated legal commentors saying that the Constitution sets the qualifications for running for president. I agree the Constitution controls but it also
2. First, they got McCarthy to authorize it under a threat to remove him as speaker. Second, I'm looking for who was not there. And Scott Perry didn't attend. I think this group including Jeffrey Clark are all targets and may know they are about to be charged so they are
3. engaging in performance art as part of their strategy to claim that they are being charged for their political views. There may be others who did not attend this event who are targeted but they may have offers on the table that are not being extended to this group.