In the spirit of @lingerie_addict, who has said on many occasions that there's no shame in not knowing something, as everyone learns for the first time, here is a thread on how to find shoes that fit 🧵
I've found over the years that many people don't know their shoe size. Instead, they are going off a sneaker size they decided on at age 16. But sneakers are soft, squishy shoes made with foam and sometimes even knitted uppers. They don't indicate your true shoe size.
To figure out your shoe size, you have to get measured on a Brannock device. Most shoe stores will have one of these and can measure you (check Nordstrom's shoe department). This will tell you two things: the length and width of your foot.
Many ppl find leather shoes uncomfortable bc they don't know these two sizes. Sneakers are not even sized by width (or if they are, they are crudely done, such as "regular" and 'wide"). So if ur a 10EE, where D is "regular width," you'll find shoes painful unless you get an 10EE
Your Brannock size is your "true shoe size." But this is just the starting point. Shoes are made on a wooden or plastic form known as a last, over which the uppers are shaped. The last determines the shape of the shoe, and whether it will fit your foot.
Each shoe company will have its own unique set of lasts. For example, here are Alden's last. Each is named something named Barrie, Plaza, Grant, etc. Some lasts are sleeker than others; some have more room. Which last you choose depends on your foot and stylistic preferences.
Once you know ur true shoe size, you can use that as a basis for what size you need depending on the shoe company and last. For example, I'm a size 9D, but I take an 8.5 in Alden's Barrie last. @Leffot has a converter on their site, but sometimes you have to do a bit of research
OK, so you have your Brannock size. You've narrowed in a brand and style. You now have the shoes on your feet. Do they fit? Here are some tips on how to know:
It's normal to have a bit of spacing between your toes and the front of the shoe. Ignore this.
What you should pay attention to is the distance from your heel to the ball of your foot. This should match up with the heel and ball of the shoe.
If you happen to have cap toes and see the creasing crossing over into the cap, your shoes are too big. This is bad:
If the leather is painfully cutting into your foot as it bends, your shoes are too small. You may need to size up in width. Width is not just the measurement *across* the ball of your foot, but the overall circumference *around* the ball of your foot. You may need more room here.
If you're buying lace-ups, it's normal for the facings (the part of the shoe through which laces go) to spread apart a little. This gives adjustability for comfort. But if the facings are too spread apart, you may have a high instep and need a different model. Try Italian brands
Next, check for heel slippage. Lace-ups shouldn't have any heel slippage, even when brand new. However, non-laced styles, such as loafers or cowboy boots, may have minimal slippage until the soles break in. Try to minimize this for a good fit, but don't go too small
Finally, a word about comfort. Some guys like a very snug fit; others want something looser. Some of this will require a learning curve. Buying your first pair of high-end shoes will feel daunting at first, but you will quickly get the hang of it and figure out what you like.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Let's first establish good vs bad ways to think about style. The first pic is correct — style is a kind of social language and you have to figure out what type of person you are. The second pic is stupid bc it takes style as disconnected objects ("this is in" vs "this is out").
I should also note here that I'm only talking about style. I'm not here to argue with you about ergonomics, water bottle holders, or whether something accommodates your Dell laptop. I'm am talking about aesthetics.
Watch these two videos. Then answer these two questions:
— Which of the two men is better dressed?
— How does each come off?
I think Carney is better dressed, partly because his clothes fit better. Notice that his jacket collar always hugs his neck, while Pierre Poilievre's jacket collar never touches him.
The level of craftsmanship that goes into a lot of Japanese menswear simply doesn't exist in the United States. You can do this for many categories — suits, jeans, hats, etc.
In this thread, I will show you just one category: men's shoes 🧵
For this comparison, I will focus on Japanese bespoke shoemaking vs. US ready-to-wear. The level of bespoke craftsmanship shown here simply doesn't exist in the US, so a Japanese bespoke vs. US bespoke comparison would be unfair. US bespoke is mostly about orthopedic work.
So instead, I will focus on the best that the US has to offer: ready-to-wear Alden.
On a basic level, top-end Japanese shoes are better because they are handwelted, whereas Alden shoes are Goodyear welted. The first involves more handwork and can be resoled more often.
In 1999, a group of Haitians were tired of political disorder and dreamed of a better life in the United States. So they built a small, 23-foot boat by hand using pine trees, scrap wood, and used nails. They called the boat "Believe in God." 🧵
In a boat powered by nothing but a sail, they somehow made it from Tortuga Island to the Bahamas (about a 90 mile distance). Then from the Bahamas, they set sail again. But a few days and some hundred miles later, their makeshift boat began to sink.
The men on the boat were so dehydrated this point, one slipped in and out of consciousness, unable to stand. They were all resigned to their death.
Luckily, they were rescued at the last minute by the US Coast Guard.
After this post went viral, I called Caroline Groves, a world-class bespoke shoemaker, to discuss how women's shoes are made. I normally don't talk about womenswear, but I found the information interesting, so I thought I would share what I learned here. 🧵
Footwear is broadly broken into two categories: bespoke and ready-to-wear. In London, bespoke makers, including those for women, are largely focused on traditional styles, such as wingtip derbies and loafers. Emiko Matsuda is great for this.
In Paris, there's Massaro, a historic firm that has been operating since 1894, now owned by Chanel. Their designs are less about creating the women's equivalent of traditional men's footwear and more about things such as heels or creative styles. Aesthetic is still "traditional."
Earlier today, Roger Stone announced his partnership with a menswear company, where together they've released a collection of tailored clothing items.
Here is my review of those pieces. 🧵
The line is mostly comprised of suits and sport coats, supplemented with dress shirts and one pair of odd trousers (tailor-speak for a pair of pants made without a matching jacket). Suits start at $1,540; sport coats are $1,150. One suit is $5,400 bc it's made from Scabal fabric
Let's start with the good points. These are fully canvassed jackets, meaning a free floating canvas has been tacked onto the face fabric to give it some weight and structure. This is better than a half-canvas and fully fused construction, but requires more time and labor.