Nick Mark MD Profile picture
Jun 19 6 tweets 5 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
Lots of inane comments from Elon/Rohan bros that vaccines don’t prevent disease.

Let’s debunk these claims:
1. Polio - vaccine introduced 1957
ourworldindata.org/grapher/report…

2. Measles - vaccine introduced 1963
ourworldindata.org/grapher/measle… ImageImage
3. Tetanus - vaccine 1938
cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/…

4. Diphtheria
researchgate.net/publication/32… ImageImage
5. Hepatitis A - 1996
cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/6…

6. Hepatitis B - 1982
cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/6… ImageImage
Lots of tin foil hat folks acknowledge that COVID deaths are reduced by the vaccine but claim an increase in all cause mortality.

In fact the opposite is true: COVID vaccination was associated with LOWER all cause mortality & non-COVID mortality.

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P… Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Nick Mark MD

Nick Mark MD Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @nickmmark

Jun 8
The long awaited #COVIDOUT RCT is now in @TheLancet:
- high risk adults randomized to either metformin (MET), ivermectin (IVM), fluvoxamine (FLV) or placebo.
- MET reduced the risk of long COVID (6.3% vs 10.4%; NNT = 24)
- no benefit with IVM or FLV

thelancet.com/journals/lanin…
1/ ImageImageImageImage
COVID-OUT was a large blinded multicenter RCT looking at repurposed oral meds.

The primary outcome was severe COVID; this was one of the *MANY* negative RCTs of ivermectin. (See 🧵👇)

The current study is a planned secondary analysis, looking at the incidence of long COVID.
2/
COVID-OUT was a factorial design enabling efficient evaluation of multiple oral medications in various combinations.

After diagnosis, subjects received meds by next day mail. They were followed up to 300 days (10 months).

Diagnosis of long COVID was made by a synonym survey
3/ ImageImageImage
Read 9 tweets
May 28
Pulmonary teaching case: you are called to the bedside of a 60yo man who was admitted for pneumonia a week ago. You were called because “he coughed and now his chest is PULSATING!”

This is what you see at the site of a previously removed chest drain:

What’s the diagnosis?
1/ twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
This is Empyema necessitans (EN):

EN is a rare complication of an infected pleural effusion where purulent fluid “escapes” the pleura and erodes into the chest wall, causing an extrapleural fluid collection that communicates with the pleural space.

From @Radiopaedia:
2/ twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Because Empyema necessitans communicates with the pleural space, fluid can move back & forth with respiration, as seen here:

With inspiration, negative intra-thoracic pressure pulls the fluid into the chest. With expiration, positive intra-thoracic pressure pushes fluid out.
3/ twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Read 7 tweets
May 25
Interesting RCT in @NEJM about platelet transfusions prior to CVC placement in people w/ thrombocytopenia (Plt 10-50k):
- higher rate of grade 2-4 bleeding w/o Plt transfusion: 11.9% vs 4.9%
- difference driven by much more bleeding w/ subclavian lines
nejm.org/doi/full/10.10…
1/ Image
This trial enrolled n=338 hospitalized people in 🇳🇱 with platelets between 10-50k, INR <1.5 (changed to 3.0). 57% were heme/onc patients & 43% were ICU patients.

Median Plt count was 30k

Most were getting a CVC for chemoTx. (Most weren’t exactly your “typical” ICU patient.)
2/ ImageImage
Importantly they placed the CVC within 1 hour or randomization. This means they probably didn’t transfuse then place a line, more like placed a line while transfusing.

(IMO this difference matters in situations where platelets are dysfunctional, like uremia)
3/ Image
Read 7 tweets
May 24
ATS’ Leadership are in a Kobiyashi Maru situation with #ConferenceGate
- one one hand, they signed a terrible contract and stand to lose a ton of money if they pull out of Orlando
- the other hand, they risk having no one show up & alienating most of their members
#ATSSafe4All
1/
People are angry. Seeing how many green ribbons there are at ATS, it’s dawning on ATS’ leadership that they screwed up big time.

They wonder: Will these people boycott Orlando 3 times in the next decade? Will they keep paying dues? Is this an existential threat to the org?
2/
The easiest move for the EC is to do nothing and (try to) pass the buck: If ATS implodes in 10 years after three disastrously unattended Orlando conferences will anyone remember whose fault it was?

By then EC members will have moved on to other things. Will we remember them?
3/ ImageImageImage
Read 6 tweets
May 14
You've probably heard that Bicarbonate has to turn into CO2 to raise the pH. “Don’t give bicarb if you can’t increase ventilation.”

But how much CO2 is there in an amp of sodium bicarbonate?

A bicarb 🧵
1/ Image
Sodium bicarbonate raises the pH by binding H+ ions and turning into CO2 and water.

For my fellow 🧪 nerds, I’ll write:

HCO3 (aq) + H+ (aq) --> CO2 (g) + H2O (l)

2/ Image
This means that - just like adding alka-seltzer to water - when we give sodium bicarbonate we liberate CO2 & raise the pH!

In fact the major ingredient in Alka-Selzer is sodium bicarb!

(Also can we agree that this is the creepiest mascot ever?)


3/
Read 10 tweets
May 13
Real shitty explanation by @atscommunity about where they plan to hold future conferences.

TL/DR: On one hand they had to consider safety & inclusion, on the other hand ATS’ sterling “reputation in the meetings industry.” They prioritized the latter.

news.thoracic.org/community/pres… ImageImage
I’m disappointed that they have prioritized profit over the concerns of members.

Frankly, I would have been willing to pay higher dues, higher conference fees, legal fees, etc if the financial concerns had been raised transparently.

Instead they decided unilaterally.
2/
A few more points to respond to:

“Who knows what the policy will be in 10 years?”

This is textbook passing the buck, a major problem in organizations with annual rotating leadership.

We ought to elect leaders who are willing to make hard decisive choices.
3/ Image
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(