Justin Alexander Profile picture
Jun 19 6 tweets 2 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
Re: 5E DMG. #dnd

A lot is made of chapter order (start by creating a pantheon of gods!). That's easy to point to, but is really only representative of the more fundamental problem:

The designers didn't have a clear vision for the structure of play. Cover of 5E Dungeon Master'...
So there's a bunch of stuff, but very little of it is actually connected to any clear function. It seems mostly sourced from other D&D books and a vague sense that this is "cool" or "should be there."

Which makes it tough for the reader to come to grips with it.
It's like a hoarder's garage. If you dig through it, you're occasionally like, "Holy crap! There's a 3D printer in here!"

The print head is missing and you'll need to track down some filament before you can use it, but... 3D printer! Wow!
How did this happen?

AFAICT, it was a deliberate decision to NOT have a clear vision for play.

They wanted to restore D&D's big tent, and they did it by being really vague about what was inside the tent.
If we teach you how to key and run a dungeon, then we might alienate people who want to key and run their dungeons differently.
If you're wondering what a clear vision of play looks like...

I have a book for that.

thealexandrian.net/so-you-want-to…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Justin Alexander

Justin Alexander Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @hexcrawl

Jun 20
When I did theater, we would periodically run into "my significant other is uncomfortable with my character (me) kissing someone onstage."

Never once had someone's significant other get concerned about their significant other getting stabbed or haunted by a ghost on stage.
Remove the script and the formality of the stage and... well...
I'm not even saying "it's because people will get concerned." I'm saying human emotion is complicated and personal comfort with emotion, particularly in Puritanical America, is varied.
Read 16 tweets
Jan 20
OGL 1.2 survey is live.

survey.alchemer.com/s3/7182208/OGL…  1. Would you like to provide feedback on the content of the
Well... a lot, actually. 2. Now that you've read the proposed OGL 1.2, what concerns
But here's my tight response:

Attempting to de-authorize the OGL is simply unacceptable. I will not purchase anything from Hasbro if you persist in this extra-legal act of cultural vandalism.
Read 29 tweets
Jan 20
Let's sneak peek the survey.

survey.alchemer.com/s3/7182208/OGL… Image
Yes, please. 1. Would you like to provid...
And it immediately broke.

Very cool. You have already submitted ...
Read 5 tweets
Jan 20
If the #DnDBegone survey doesn't allow direct feedback on these six issues, it will be virtually impossible to believe that the surveys are anything but a PR stunt.
To review:
- De-authorizing OGL v1.0a
- WotC having a unilateral and uncontestable power to revoke your use of the license
- No mechanism for sharing open content
- Print or PDF products only / VTT restrictions
- WotC's ability to change terms of the license
- Severability
To these pre-OGL v1.2 problems, I would personally add:

- Redefining the word "irrevocable"
- What material is being placed under the Creative Commons
Read 4 tweets
Jan 19
Let's revisit this thread now that WotC has released OGL v1.2 (Draft).

Have they actually addressed the deeply problematic things they attempted to do?

Spoilers: No.

Deauthorizing OGL v1.0a: They are doing this.

New License is Revocable: The license says "irrevocable," but WotC has a unilateral and uncontested ability to prohibit you from distributing anything you release using the license.

WotC Gets Final Approval: They are doing this.
No Mechanism for Sharing Open Content: This still true. The license ONLY grants permission to use WotC's "Licensed Content" and cannot be used to create a community of open content.

Print or PDF Products Only: Mostly still true, although they're allowing static text in VTTs.
Read 11 tweets
Jan 19
The OGL 1.2 (Draft) is still de-authorizing the OGL 1.0a and gives no mechanism for anyone who used other people's OGC under the license to keep their work in print.

WotC is lying to you.
OGL 1.2 (Draft) is not an open license: You cannot use the license to open your content.

It is a unilateral license which can only be used to license material from WotC.

WotC is lying to you.
OGL 1.2 (Draft) gives WotC a unilateral and uncontested ability to prohibit you from distributing anything you release using the license.

It is not an open license.

WotC is lying to you.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(