might be time to make a list of all of the requested investments that *didn't* get funding from the GO Bonds from the state legislature because we gave $250m for the Interstate Bridge Replacement.
first up, a $45m health and recreation center at OSU-Cascades near Bend
transportation advocates had requested $50m for fixing up SW Hall Boulevard in Tigard, $100m for ODOT's Great Streets program and were angling for $30m for SE Powell too.
in christmas tree bill there's only $1m for Great Streets, $3m for Hall.
doesn't appear to be any money for Bridge of the Gods, either. Another bridge over the Columbia River sorely in need of seismic retrofit. Helluva lot cheaper, too
"These are the very human costs when we commit the full $1 billion in general fund-supported dollars to the IBR freeway expansion without putting in fiscal guardrails. Our kids are being asked to shoulder budget cuts, but our freeway projects [are not.]"
Rep Susan McLain celebrating in W+M that she's allocating $1m to the Great Streets program at ODOT.
The original ask was for at least $100m.
The need is $300m.
But that's not stopping McLain from celebrating a "multmodal investment" after giving $1b ($1000m) to the IBR. #orleg
it appears that funding for the two passenger rail study bills - HB 2662 and SB 14 - are also dead.
Total, these bills would have cost $500k.
it's abundantly clear that leadership of the Joint Committee of Transportation is profoundly disinterested in any policy or investment that deviates from status quo - giving ODOT gigantic checks for more roads, starving transit, avoiding urgently needed safety investments. #orleg
to top it all off, freeway lobbyists snuck in language at the end of SB 1049, an unrelated bill, that eliminated the original fiscal guardrails for @IbrProgram established in 2013.
@IbrProgram@OregonDOT .@i5bridgenow advocates were asking for these guardrails established in 2013 during the Columbia River Crossing to stay in place during @IbrProgram. They included numerous checks and balances to ensure the legislature could monitor how IBR spent funding.
@IbrProgram@OregonDOT@i5bridgenow this language was snuck into an amendment of an entirely different omnibus bill, introduced at 11:02 today, less than four hours before voted in Ways and Means.
A profoundly antidemocratic process.
@IbrProgram@OregonDOT@i5bridgenow it's not like ODOT has a ridiculous reputation and track record for massive cost overruns on their megaprojects or anything
IBR freeway lobbyists snuck in language asking for A FULL BILLION DOLLARS (not the $250m originally floated) in general obligation bonds for a BILL GETTING VOTED OUT OF COMMITTEE TOMORROW.
We'll have an action alert up ASAP, all hands on deck! #orleg#orpol
the bill is HB 5005, the omnibus General Obligation Bond bill. We're going to be asking you to email legislators to remove Sections 5-7 which allocate $250m of bonding in 2025, 2027 and 2029.
that's not highway money - that's general money that should be going to schools/housing
This is ODOT's backroom deal.
Despite overwhelming opposition from the public towards giving the agency a blank check for this big freeway, and significant support for right-sizing this bridge, freeway lobbyists snuck this language into HB 5005: #orleg
lol, @OregonDOT/@UrbMobilityOfc out here celebrating "national safety month" by showing a photo of the gigantic fucking freeway expansion they are building in clackamas that is robbing the state of money to fix ODOT's actually lethal dangerous streets. complete propaganda #orleg
@OregonDOT@UrbMobilityOfc seriously, do they have no shame? traffic fatalities are skyrocketing across the state, in large part because @OregonDOT spends all their money on freeways and doesn't fix TV Highway, Se Powell, McLoughlin.
guess hiding that is the point of hiring glitzy PR consultants! #orleg
@OregonDOT@UrbMobilityOfc maybe instead of patting themselves on the back for rebranding massive freeway projects as "safety investments" @OregonDOT should prioritize investments in our orphan highways? #orleg
@OregonDOT "The science used to support freeway expansions is inaccurate and outdated and should be reevaluated. Portland has seen a record high of vehicular violence in the last year."
ok, buckle up, folks. We're about to get started w/ the Rose Quarter Freeway Expansion joint meeting of the Executive Steering Committee, Historic Albina Advisory Board, and the Community Advisory Oversight Committee.
starts at 4, we'll be livetweeting
to our knowledge, it's the first time the ESC (largely elected officials) the HAAB (Albina community members) and the COAC (contractors) have all met on same meeting
ODOT's been rumored to be intending to use this meeting to push back on community groups calling for better caps
We share the opinions of our pals at City Observatory:
NMF asked ODOT repeatedly over last few months about the freeway width. ODOT lied, and repeatedly said if we wanted to know more, we'd need to do a FOIA.
Unbeknownst to them, we already did a FOIA, and knew they were lying:
@OregonDOT First document is from 2017; 2nd is from 2019. It took *months* of FOIA efforts to get our hands on these very basic documents showing what @oregondot intends to build in the Albina neighborhood.
It shouldn't take months of legal posturing to find out what ODOT intends to build