Renee Sekel Profile picture
Jun 21 14 tweets 4 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
I need to talk about what happened at the NC House K-12 Education Committee today, because it's a distillation of the arrogance and disregard with which the #NCGOP is leading the legislature right now. A 🧵
I was at the meeting because the Committee was considering SB49, colloquially known as the "Don't Say Gay" Bill. The Bill, as its sponsors acknowledge, is mostly just a recitation of rights parents already have. What's new are forced-outing mandates (and a few other bad things)
As usual, I showed up about 40 minutes early; by that point there was a line at the door. Some of the folks waiting to get inside had been turned away from another Committee meeting where an anti-Trans bill was being heard. We waited until about 10:48 to be allowed in the room.
The meeting was set to start at 11, and we asked where the sign up sheet for public comment was. There wasn't one just then but eventually we were told that the Committee would allow 10 people to speak for a minute each; evenly divided among people for and against the bill.
Now, right off the bat that's a problem because there were far more than 10 people there to speak on the bill, and they were NOT evenly divided in their opinions. This process of picking speakers already leaves a false impression of the kind of support the bill has (or doesn't)
But at least there's some semblance of public participation, so it was what it was. By this time, it was about 11, and the legislators were in the room, chatting. I watched Committee Chair @triciacotham work the room, at one point stroking the arm of the man sitting next to her.
The meeting, which was supposed to start at 11am, was actually gaveled in at 11:08. I live-tweeted the whole thing, and the last tweet I sent before the meeting ended was at 11:48. When I live tweet, sometimes I'll write a few tweets and publish them in batches.
That's what happened here; I had two or three tweets written and was getting ready to press send when at around 11:50, ten minutes early, Rep. Cotham decided to end the meeting. She'd announced earlier that there wouldn't be public comment if they ran out of time.
But of course, there was time; at least 18 minutes' worth. She just chose to end the meeting early, rather than letting the members of the public who came out today to say their piece actually do so.
I waited until Rep. Cotham gaveled the meeting out, so as not to be disruptive, but then I stood up. And I yelled. I told the committee that what they were doing -- denying the public the right to speak -- was wrong.
I HATE that I yelled. I am a rule follower to my core and hours later, I still feel queasy about even that tiny disruption. To be clear, I'm not even a little bit sorry that I stood up and said what I said, but I absolutely hate that I had to.
I hate that Representative Cotham and her #NCGOP colleagues have such contempt for the people of North Carolina that they'll manipulate schedules, twist rules and do everything in their power to make sure out voices aren't heard.
I hate that they are passing bill after harmful bill and acting like we should all be grateful for the fleeting moments when they deign to cast their eyes on the people they're supposed to be serving.
We the People of NC deserve so much better than the cruelty and disregard with which the #NCGOP treats us and our state. So, I will keep yelling. I will hate every moment of it, but I'll do it. Join me?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Renee Sekel

Renee Sekel Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @RaSekel

Jun 21
At the House K-12 education committee meeting, where they’ll be considering S49, the “Don’t Say Gay” bill. As usual, the chair is playing games wrt public comment; there’s still no sign up sheet despite the fact that there’s been a line at the door for almost an hour. Image
Follow along as I live tweet. Th usual caveats apply: I’m not a reporter, I miss things. I type what I hear, paraphrase brutally, and only phrases with quotation marks should be considered actual quotes.
There are a lot of people here hoping to comment; I count at least 20.
Read 39 tweets
Feb 1
I’ve just arrived in the Committee room where they’ll be discussing the Don’t Say Gay bill. I’ve asked to be allowed to provide public comment, but they aren’t sure they public will be allowed to speak today.
Mind you, this meeting was called upon less than 18 hours notice, at a time when all of the people it most harms — public school students — cannot attend.
I’ll live tweet as much as I can.
Read 49 tweets
Feb 5, 2022
So, there’s an argument flying around tonight about the gerrymandering decision, and I need to discuss it. In dissent, the Republican members of the NCSC said, among other things, that the court shouldn’t interfere b/c voters chose a GOP legislature, which means 1/
That they wanted the GOP to redraw the maps, knowing that they’d gerrymander the heck out of them. In essence, that the Court should assent to the majority’s desire to give their votes more weight than those votes would naturally have carried. This is silly for a few reasons. 2/
First, the argument assumes that all GOP voters both knew that the NCGA would craft itself a supermajority out of proportion to their vote share and approved of that tactic. IIRC, @ForwardCarolina has polling to the contrary. 3/
Read 9 tweets
Jan 24, 2022
Ok, I'm waiting for this committee meeting to begin (NCGA House Select Cmte. on An Education System for NC's Future). On the agenda: a conservative activist group to talk about why the NC Constitution doesn't apply to the legislature. 1/?
Also on the agenda: a discussion by committee members of what schools would look like if they had their way. I think it's worth noting who's being invited to take part in these meetings. Hint: not educators, education experts, or members of the public. Just hand-picked 2/
ideologs who will tell the committee leadership what they want to hear. Good times. Kicking off, speaker says the goal of the committee is to decide what schools look like if there wasn't an existing public education system. Maybe it will be new and improved!
Read 51 tweets
Sep 13, 2021
A follow-up #LeadWithLeandro thread. Last week, I talked about how extraordinary the NCGA's stance in the case is, and someone asked me what the Court can do to make the Legislature comply. I did some research over the weekend, and here's what I learned: 1/
First, most (possibly all) state constitutions guarantee the state's children the right to a public education, and unsurprisingly, there has been litigation in many states about what counts as a Constitutionally sound education, how it should be provided and what it costs. 2/
As best as I can tell, in typical cases where there has been litigation, the Court has made a determination of what a Constitutionally sound education means in that state and has issued opinions ordering the State to comply. 3/
Read 20 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(