There is scene in River Runs Through It where Brad Pitt character shows awesome prowess and commitment to catching huge fish, floating halfway down the river and almost over giant waterfall. His onlooking brother, the narrator, then says, “I knew then I was witnessing perfection https://t.co/Vpxualz07a
…but just as surely that life *is not a work of art* and the moment could not last.” I often juxtapose this scene, which I’ve always found moving and maybe truthful, with BAP mishimian exhortation: MAKE YOURSELF A WORK OF ART!
It makes me think favorite lines from Brothers K, which basically says that everything that is, living and inert, actually *is* a work of art—infinitely complex and perfectly ordered and inexhaustibly intelligible—everything except for man, whose default tends to mar the canvas
All rays and beams can be traced back to where they converge, and the truth is contained in a single infinitesimal point around which all the rest of existence revolves. Interdasting. As movie says, “all things merge into one, and a river runs through it.”
Man wants to project his wretchedness onto the rest of the world, when in truth no other creature shares our alienation from our creator’s intention. Their existences, as cogs in ecological machines and as cogs unto themselves, are works of art, of higher and lesser orders
Even drabness and the gore of nature can be understood this way, but it is great folly for man mistake this solemnity of nature for fallenness or distance btwn creature and creator, because it gives him an excuse not to excel, or at least to hitch his wagon to a man of excellence
Yes is true, life is not a work of art. But you could make yours one if you just stopped being so ghey and worrisome about everything. After all, when was the last time you saw a sparrow gathering wheat into a barn? Squirrel is exception that proves the rule. And this is Darwin..
Misinterpretation anyway. Squirrel does not know future. He does not exist in time. He is not storing acorn and other nuts for winter. He is planting oaks and hickories. He does this because it pleases Him.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Been thinking more about this today. Do you realize that, ultimately, the bioleninist regime will have remove all interactions you may have with animool and plant? This is because their very existence contradicts their most base assumption: that creatures’ nature is malleable
The regime’s agricultural system already prerequires the nuking of vast acreages in order eliminate enough life to be viable. China solar panel carpet mountain landscape. You see beaver build dam and think, is nature for beaver to build dam, what is nature for me to do?
If you think this thought you’ve already transgressed a regime piety, by implying that some human nature or essence exists outside of our random whimsies and fantasies. They want you to believe that your essence is determined by whatever bizarre pathology pops into your head…
Complete and total lie, and such a basic lie that it is impossible to imagine that it is being uttered in ignorant good faith. Wherever it is too dry for plant matter to decompose (most of the world’s land), the removal of animals CREATES bare ground (desertification)
It’s not complicated or difficult to understand. Succession requires decay which requires moisture. On most of the world’s land, the only place moist enough for cellulose to decompose is inside the rumens of herbivores.
This isn’t to say that overgrazing isn’t just as bad as undergrazing. It makes perfect sense that they should both be equally bad, and both should result in the death of plants. because the impact of the cow is neither positive nor negative. What decides is *management*
Alright, fight fans. Be careful what you wish for, because now you’re all DOOMED: it’s finally time for the long-awaited, much-anticipated GOOD. WILL. HUNTING. DEBUNKED & BEDUNKED. THREAD. Strap in, anon. It’s time to “go see about a girl.”
As far as libtard fetishes go, this flick has it all. I mean, it’s a movie about THERAYP. But not just that. It’s about upward mobility. It’s about human… MOTILITY. And most of all it’s about a man’s ABILITY… to allow a woman to final soften his childhood abuse-hardened heart.
On that note, let’s start with the end. Will takes the-rapist’s—serial villainous shitlib Robin Williams (deceitful tr00n in Mrs. Doubtfire, perfidious queer in Birdcage)—advice to abandoned friends and homeland to GO WEST in hot pursuit of his MID British doctor girlboss gf,
Wokeism is nothing more another sorry attempt by subaverage but rhetorically exploitative minds to address the universal human condition, which is the experience of alienation from a centralizing human essence or special nature, which no other creature observably shares.
There many other such attempts. Only one (premodern Christianity) is and ever can be successful, because only it can address the root causes. Wokeism addresses neither cause nor effect of this condition: its strategy is to postulates that no such condition, or alienation, exists.
It does so by asserting that a human essence can be accessed through each person’s unique individuality. The trouble is that it sets no standard or structure for what an individual should be. This is why all adherents of this ideology eventual melt into obese, amorphous blobs.
At the time I thought this was a very dumb argument, but didn’t want to weigh in because I am wholesome chungus, forward and sensitive young man who prefers to please everyone, be very charming and avoid controversy. But now I will say something that should be pretty obvious…
At least insofar as you are living in the real world, which perhaps some of you are not. This is that: it’s both, and that’s the point. Particularly if you’re a young man, they want you to be horny all the time, but unable to sate your lust with anything other than pornography
Great piece from a great man, @ChivalryGuild is easily one of my top three favorite accounts on here. Here he defends the necessity of physical training and prowess from recent attack. If I may, I want to expand on one of his points. In response to the critique that gym culture..
Plays into the liberal tendency toward earthly self-deification, Chivalry says that the gym is the where a man learns the power of his own agency.
But I would say the gym is not so much where he learns his body’s power, it’s where he learns and confronts its limits
In other words, serious athletic training of any kind is literally the opposite of self-deification: it is, even on the cellular level, the continuous breaking down of the self so that it can be rebuilt in superior fashion it its antecedent phenotypes.