A comprehensive thread about the PLA reforms of 2016.
🔴How the CPC centralized control of the military and streamlined the chain of command.
🔴What old problems that existed and fixed.
🔴How susceptible was China to a coup before the 2016 reform?
🧵
pre-2016 the organizational structure of the PLA revolved around 4 departments
🔹General Staff Department
🔹General Political Department
🔹General Logistics Department
🔹General Armaments Department
For lack of a better word, the departments are like independent feudal kingdoms
A worrying sign developed during President Hu's era 2002-2012
Back then, there was a habit of these 4 General Departments to draft their own documents and personnel changes
While sending the finalized version of the documents to the Central Military Commission (CMC) of the CPC
This was problematic because the CMC was supposed to be the supreme military body in China.
With the powerful Departments, the CMC was turned into a rubberstamp organization.
This breeds corruption.
Like these 2 corrupt traitor generals who at the time ranked above Xi Jinping
The 2016 reform abolished the 4 General departments, and established 15 subsidiary organs under the direct command of the CMC.
Green Box in graph below⬇️
It delegated responsibilities to more numerous but more refined smaller departments.
Centralizing control under the CMC.
ANOTHER PROBLEM👀
Created by the old system were Factionalism
Where the officer corps tends to be more loyal to their respective Military Regions, rather than the central government.
This problem was exacerbated by the 7 powerful Military Regions (M.R.)
Each M.R. is like their own little Kingdom, they are responsible for administration, organization, procurement, personnel
AND combat command.
All of which can bypass the CMC, again making it a rubberstamp.
The 2016 reforms abolished the 7 Military Regions and established the 5 Theater Commands (TC)
Each TC is ONLY responsible for combat operations.
While Administrative, Procurement, Logistics and Organizational functions were delegated to the individual military branch H.Q (Army, Navy, Air Force etc.)
This means the Theater Commands are only responsible for operations command (plan and fight wars)
Each Theater Commands can deploy Army, Naval and Air Forces units within their area of responsibility.
The 4 TC are then joined together by the:
Joint Staff Department of the Central Military Commission.
This reform splits the power of the Military Regions
While consolidating and delegating responsibilities to more fine-tuned departments and Theater Commands
Which made the PLA both more efficient AND more efficiently controlled by the Communist Party of China
So before the 2016 reform, the PLA did have the potential to conduct a coup.
Unlikely, but the convoluted chain of commands made some people question where their loyalties lie.
I actually wrote more details about the technical aspects of the reform.
How it affected lower echelon units, and a frustrating problems exposed during the Battle of Paracel Islands
But I'll save that for another day
My long threads don't always get the most engagements
So if you want to hear more, make sure to like and retweet🥰
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Air defense missile knowledge can be very esoteric.
So here's a thread detailing the capabilities of PLA's major air defense systems.🧵
**This database isn't the normally advertised numbers, the data we've compiled take into account of intercept geometries and their roles.
HQ-9B
🔹Effective range: ~300km
🔹Flight Ceiling: ~30km
🔹Average speed: Mach 4.5+
🔹Mission profile: Long range air defense against aircraft, with some capabilities against short and medium range ballistic missiles in their terminal flight.
Compared to the HQ-9C listed below⬇️; The HQ-9B has a more sustained power flight path, but slower speed, making them very good against maneuvering targets like aircraft.
HQ-9C
🔹Effective range: ~250km
🔹Flight ceiling: ~50km
🔹Average speed: Mach 8+
🔹Mission profile: High-altitude, long range air defense with enhanced capabilities against tactical ballistic missiles.
The missile's slightly slimmer profile compared to HQ-9B gives the C variant much higher speed and longer unpowered cruising range.
The HQ-9C has an estimated burnout velocity of Mach 9.5+, which means it flies fast and burns out quickly, making them less effective against maneuvering aircraft than the B variant, but much more effective against fast moving missiles.
With the introduction of the diesel-electric hybrid tank by China; The ZTZ-100, we now can have sci-fi systems like:
♦️Electromagnetic armor (EFA)
♦️Electrothermal Chemical Gun (ETC gun)
Detailed thread on the future of land/armored warfare developed by China.
🧵
The Type-100 family is made up of serval platforms, including the ZTZ-100 tank and the ZBD-100 fire support vehicle and they are only the start.
There will also be a 50 ton class heavy main battle tank with 125mm electrothermal chemical(ETC) gun with electromagnetic armor (EFA)
We will also have a long range fire support vehicle with vertical launch systems (VLS), capable of storing 20+ long range (10km+) heavy anti-tank missiles.
They together create a network of systems on land, capable of first detection, first shot and first kill.
A thread detailing the speed, range and trajectory of China's anti-ship hypersonic missiles.
Our potential enemies have no way of intercepting these missiles, so it's only fair to let them know, how their billion dollar ship will be destroyed.
🧵
How China's 4th gen tank exemplifies the differences in force design between China and the US?🧵1/8
The US military has global projection needs, their weapons are not specialized to do certain tasks in certain regions against certain enemies. It's a case of jack of all trade.
Meanwhile, China's ZTZ-201 light MBT is specifically designed to fight in Taiwan and the Himalayas.
Taiwan's useful terrain is very flat, dotted with cities and towns that are less than 2km apart.
Hence engagement even for armored/mechanized forces will be that 2km dash over farmlands then into cities.
Short engagements between tanks, if it ever happens, will be from covered position shooting at each other.
This means drones and sensor networks are more important than pure mass in armor.
Comprehensive minute-by-minute illustrative thread, on how the Chinese aircraft carrier Fujian conducts cyclical attack operation.
🧵1/15
The optimal air wing composition:
⏺️24x J-35(green & red), divided into 2 attack waves of 12 each.
⏺️24x J-15T (blue & purple), divided into 2 attack waves of 12 each.
⏺️4x J-15D electronic warfare fighter (orange).
⏺️4x J-600 AEW&C (light blue).
⏺️~10 helicopters (black) for anti-submarine, search and rescue missions.
Cyclical operations are the most common attack mode of aircraft carriers, they divide the carrier airwing into attack waves and launch them with intervals in between.
This allows sustained operation for a long periods of time.
🔹Wave 1 (green J-35 stealth fighters) takes 12 minutes to launch 12x J-35, + 2 min to launch 1x KJ-600 (light blue) + 1 min to launch 2x J-15D EW fighter (orange).
= 15 minutes.
**Catapults can launch aircraft with 30 second intervals.
A comprehensive thread about Chinese aircraft carrier operations.
How do we compare to the US aircraft carrier operations?
For the PLA navy, there are 2 main types of carrier attacks:
🔹Full-deck strike (Full deck sortie).
🔹Cyclical operation.
1/11🧵
Full-deck strike is when we launch all fighters in a single strike package.
Cyclical operation is when we divide the fighters into attack waves, and launch them sequentially.
Full-deck strike is used when you want overwhelming firepower delivered in the initial phase of combat.
However, full-deck strike cannot be sustained for long, since all the fighters would need to land in a short span of time, which puts immense pressure on the deck crew to rearm and refuel.