1. Anna doesn't know her history well and she clearly never read my reality series of blogs. Shall we school her?
2. I will remind you again, we have two genomes in us, one bacterial that controls energy flux in tissues and the other virally based that controls nuclear-based genes. The bacterial one mutates 5 times faster than the other and it shows maternal inheritance. It is massively… https://t.co/vDZBXow2vdtwitter.com/i/web/status/1…
3. So what happens when we block parts of the spectrum of the sun or get too much of parts we are not supposed to experience?  Can separated visible light cause digital toxicity in the skin & eyes of Ancient humans?

Do you know when this “light assault” really began on human… https://t.co/336mFQVBCwtwitter.com/i/web/status/1…
4. Humans have always wanted to look attractive. Even in ancient times, people desired to avoid sunburn. This takes us back to the Egyptian days. Egyptians always considered light skin more beautiful than dark skin. However, Egypt’s sun-drenched environment made it difficult to… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
5. The Egyptians used ingredients that have been rediscovered by modern scientists. For example, the Egyptians used rice bran extracts in some of their sunscreen formulas. Today, gamma oryzanol is extracted from rice bran and is used in industry for its UV-absorbing properties.… https://t.co/5VOAafao20twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
6. In the early 1930s, a South Australian chemist, HA Milton Blake, experimented and produced a sunburn cream. Following this invention, the founder of L’Oreal Company, chemist Eugene Schueller refined the invention and the first sunscreen made its debut in 1936.  Guys, 1936 is… https://t.co/BArJMH2MJutwitter.com/i/web/status/1…
7. Later in 1938, a famous chemist called Franz Greiter developed a cream that he named Gletscher Crème or Glacier Cream. He also came up with something called the sun protection factor which is now known as the SPF factor in sunscreen. Franz invented the SPF factor which then… https://t.co/SfsxTs9ys4twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
8. Finally, in 1980, Coppertone developed the first UVA/UVB sunscreen which has been in the markets with different names.

Scientists are still searching for more effective ways to protect the human body against the sun. In my opinion, they should stop. The best way to protect… https://t.co/1uO23F8sWXtwitter.com/i/web/status/1…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with ☣️ Pleb Kruse = BTC foundationalist in exile 🟩🔆

☣️ Pleb Kruse = BTC foundationalist in exile 🟩🔆 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DrJackKruse

Jan 31
In my decentralized framework, this is exactly how the system is wired. The nipple-areola complex acts as a quantum-optical sensor, and the infant’s saliva is the fiber-optic cable delivering a real-time UPE (ultra-weak photon emission) status report from the child's mitochondria to the mother’s "manufacturing plant."

This isn't just convenience; it is a biophysical "handshake" that ensures the survival of the post Cambrian hardware mammals need to thrive.

1. Saliva as the "Optical Bio-Feed"

Saliva is a highly structured, mineral-rich fluid. In my thesis, it serves as the medium for optical information transfer:
The Child’s Signal: When a calf or child is sick, their internal "optical smog" increases. The VUV (Vacuum Ultraviolet) and chaotic UPEs produced by their congested Complex II are transmitted through the saliva. Congestion usually is due to reverse electron flow or deuterium.
The Mother’s Sensor: The areola is one of the most melanized and innervated tissues in the mammalian body. Melanin here doesn't just protect against the sun; it acts as a broadband transducer like an optical scanner in the grocery store. It "reads" the frequency of the biophotons in the saliva.

2. The Backflow "Optical Loop"

Research into the "infant-led" backflow confirms that when a child suckles, a vacuum is created that pulls saliva back into the mother's mammary ducts.
Information Sensing: The mother’s immune-sensing cells in the ductal walls "listen" to the ROS/RNS signatures and UPE entropy in that saliva.
The Response: If the child’s saliva "shouts" of deuterium congestion at cytochrome two because succinate is elevated  or viral "optical noise," the mother’s brain (via the SCN-hypothalamic oxytocin posterior pituitary pathway) triggers a change in milk composition. She begins to "distill" more NPD1, Iodine, and IgA antibodies into the milk to act as a "quantum reset" for the child’s mitochondria.

3. The "Rotating Mom" Phenomenon (Allomaternal Nursing)
Why do calves or elk rotate moms? In my framework, this is "Frequency Matching":
Metabolic Matching: A calf may instinctively seek a different "frequency" of milk if its own mother’s melanin-metal hardware is jammed (perhaps she spent too much time in a "dirty" environment like inside a barn under fake light).
Information Diversity: By "sampling" different mothers, the young mammal is essentially "crowd sourcing" optical coherence. They are looking for the milk with the lowest deuterium/highest DHA-D3-Iodine ratio to stabilize their own emerging Faraday cage.
Modern humans with nnEMF toxicity who cannot breast feed their children due to a lack of production should be considering what elk do when they are faced with the same problem.  This concept is foreign to humans because they do not observe nature carefully enough.

4. Milk as a "Re-Cambrian-ization" Serum

Mother's milk is the ultimate low-deuterium, high-DHA, solar-coded fuel.
Deuterium Depletion: Milk fat (cream) is naturally low in deuterium, helping the child build a "clean" 14 Angstrom tunneling gap in their developing mitochondria.
Melanocortin Programming: The act of nursing at sunrise/sunset ensures the child’s Leptin-Melanocortin pathway is synced to the mother’s, preventing the "Proterozoic regression" that leads to neolithic disease later in life.
The ranch memories you have are of a Quantum Ecosystem in action. The child’s saliva "tells" the mother's nipple exactly how the child's internal "mercury lamp" (deuterium) is burning. The mother then alters the "Optical Duty Cycle" of her milk to quench the fire.
Does this explain why formula-fed infants (drinking high-deuterium, seed-oil-heavy milk) are essentially being "pushed into the Proterozoic mud" from birth, as they lack this bidirectional optical feedback loop?  Yes, it does but few seem to care about it.

This lesson also has deep information for the diseased breast too. Men can help their women with diseased breasts by kissing their nipples religiously to transfer information to their women about how they feel for them.  This will be highly stimulatory and healing.

Cells and Stars have a lot on common.  When they fail they have mechanisms that feedback on themselves that lead to the possibility of future survival if conditions are met.  In a star when it burns through its fuel source its core gets to iron and the star begins to emit microwaves.  The microwave radiation interacts with the D shell electrons of Fe and it blows up in a super nova so the atoms it creates in this destruction can be recycled to something with more life in the cosmos.  Cells in our body use a similar idea in apoptosis, autophagy, and ferroptosis.

In my decentralized framework, the brain and breast in cancer do not operate in the same fashion regarding IDH protection because their "optical hardware" and evolutionary duty cycles are fundamentally different. Neurons are not epithelium, but breast tissue is.
While the brain relies on IDH mutations from its DHA-rich antenna to create UPEs to work and eventually help create some VUV smog from complex two back up to clean the dirty chemistry in cancer, the breast mitigates oncogenic risk through a different mechanism:

It uses the DHA-Iodine-Melanin triad.

1. The IDH Paradox: Why the Brain Needs It, But the Breast Doesn't

The brain is the ultimate "quantum sensor" that can feedback on itself and it must maintain 24/7 DHA coherence.  DHA allows for this.
The Brain (DHA Antenna): When Complex II jams, the resulting VUV emission from Deuterium threatens to shatter the DHA antenna. The IDH mutation occurs as an emergency "filter" to deplete deuterium and lower the VUV entropy.  DHA, as a PUFA explodes like the star and in its destructions NPD1 and Elovanoids along with UPEs are made which are highly anti-inflammatory.  The released UPEs feed back on IDH and mutate it in such a specific way that the brain is able to make more deuterium depleted water because of this interaction than it could before to help self sustain its survival.  This is how most low grade gliomas begin.  This process does not happen in GBM transformation due to a lack of DHA in the brain.
The Breast (The Glandular Sink): Breast tissue is not a primary "spectrometer" like the brain. Instead of a mutation-driven shunt (IDH), the breast uses Iodine as its primary "quantum ground." In the breast, the "De-Cambrian-ization" of its mitochondria is mitigated by the concentration of iodine in the Ductal-Lobular Units.
2. How the Breast Mitigates Risk: The Iodine Shield
If the brain uses the IDH mutation to "buffer" the VUV smog itsdeuterium squeeze, but the human breast uses Iodine to "quench" the fire in the cytochrome 2 Fe-S clusters that begin the disease from reverse electron flow from cytochrome 2 dysfunction.The Delta-Iodolactone Mechanism: Iodine is required to form iodo-lipids (delta-iodolactone). These act similarly to Bazan’s Elovanoids in the brain, but they are specifically tuned to inhibit the Warburg Effect in glandular tissue.
Melanin & The Nipple: The high concentration of melanin in the areola/nipple is not a "decoration." It is the Optical Port that harvests solar UV/IR to control the metal flux (Cu, Fe) in the underlying breast tissue to make sure the TCA and urea cycle are the primary pathways used to avoid cytochrome 2 congestion and Fenton reactions of Fe-S couples.
The Sink: The breast is designed as a "DHA sink" (for lactation). It mitigates VUV damage by using Melanin and Iodine to sequester the "dirty" Iron noise created from a lack of sun, nnEMF, or polarized light.  nnEMF for the breast is the stimulus that leads to ferrotoptosis destruction of the Fe-S couples and this mimics the process that happens in a star.   When Iodine is missing, the breast cannot "ground" its own self created UPE field, leading to DCIS or invasive carcinoma without the IDH "slow-burn" protection seen in the brain.
3. The Unified "De-Cambrian" Failure
Both cancers represent a Proterozoic Regression, but the "breakdown" follows the tissue's specific metal hierarchy:Brain Cancer (GBM/LGG): A failure of the DHA-VDR-IDH loop. The brain tries to mutate (IDH) to survive the VUV fire.
Breast Cancer: A failure of the Melanin-Iodine-DHA loop. Without Iodine to "buffer" the Iron D-shell electrons, the breast tissue undergoes a rapid phenotypic regression and this is how cancer begins.Image
2. Integration with Melanin and the Sun

The synthesis of both molecules is tied to the Melanin-Metal hardware:
The Sun: UVB/IR input on the skin stimulates the Leptin-Melanocortin pathway. This manages the Copper (Cu) and Manganese (Mn) levels required to build the antioxidant "Mn-SOD shield."

The Translation: Coherent UPE signals (from healthy mitochondria) then tell the cell to cleave the lipids needed for NPD1 or gamma iodolactone
.
The Result: You have a "protected" post Cambrian cell that can use oxygen via the TCA/urea cycle without producing the ionizing VUV UPEs that destroys the genome.

Bazan’s Docosanoids (Brain/Retina): These cleave from DHA to form a "Faraday cage" of 22 carbons. Their purpose is to quench the VUV (Vacuum Ultraviolet) smog emitted by deuterium in the high-density neural environment.Image
3. UPE isn't mere waste; from quantum biology, these photons (or associated fields) may mediate non-local signaling, akin to coherence in radical pairs or bystander effects.

Intensity/spectrum reflect metabolic flux:

Aerobic paths (TCA) produce more ROS/UPE than anaerobic (glycolysis); stress shifts spectra (e.g., UV-linked UPE from glycolysis/peptides). Melanin optimizes by calibrating inputs—solar photons tune metal-ROS-UPE, enabling adaptive switches via redox/epigenetic relays (e.g., NAD+/SIRT1, from the Decentralized Medicine series of blogs on Patreon).

patreon.com/DrJackKruse
Read 7 tweets
Jan 29
Plan B in El Salvador is all about the Tether gold play. This is how they want to rescue things for the surveillance state. Image
2. What is the rescue plan? Remember the famous now deleted Bessent tweet about DJT/Treasury plan to confiscate Bitcoin for the US Bitcoin Reserve? That was updated once the backlash on the tweet went out. Now it is about using Tether to centralize gold as they implode the Dollar and they will confiscate the Gold.

I've argued for 10 years that Bitcoin is a superior form of "trust-minimized" money compared to gold due to the high costs of verifying gold's authenticity.

This is the ability to own and verify an asset without relying on a third party (like a Central bank or Treasury of a government). Historically, gold's "trustless" nature was its greatest strength, but Savages now know this strength has been lost because most gold now sits in centralized vaults. This is why DJT won't let anyone audit Fort Knox. Why audit what you plan to steal?

The Cost of Validation for gold is steep so no one in the USA will want to pay that freight so now we are on the honor system for the Treasury.

Anyone who has owned gold knows that verifying that a gold bar before a sale/audit is real and pure requires specialized equipment, chemical tests, or expensive third-party audits. Because this is so difficult to do, you must have an inherit "trust" the vault or institution holding it for them. + Treasury and Bessent play. What did they do in 2025. They brought their middle man in. Tether. Go check if I am bullshitting you. Tether has bought more gold in the last 18 months than they have bought Bitcoin. Why? They are storing what the thieves in the industrial miliatry surveillence state will take down the road when the retards are sidetracked by circus maximus of some other psy-ops.

Why isn't Tether buying Bitcoin in this case? Anyone with a simple computer or smartphone can instantly verify the entire history and authenticity of their Bitcoin by running a node or using a block explorer. This "validation" is nearly free, making it more decentralized and harder to seize. Tether should be buying T bills but instead is buying Gold Reserves for the Zionist bankers to steal soon. Got it, my Savages.

Bitcoiners should know and remember their history better. This gameplan was used to before in 1933 during the Great Deperession to make it easy for governments to confiscate it.....Remember FDR's EO?

The U.S. did this already with Executive Order 6102 in 1933.

Looting and Centralization are the play. For thousands of years, physical gold was frequently stolen or seized by empires. To protect it, it was eventually moved into highly secure, centralized vaults (like those at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York or the Bank of England under control of the Treasury Head.

If the steal the gold this will tank markets including Bitcoin and then the Treasury will come in an sell gold at astronomical prices to buy Bitcoin at crashed Prices. This is how the Rockefeller and Rothschild Banks plan to do this.

If you know your history this is how the same guys did the scam during the Napoleaonic Wars. They manipulated the market with a psy-ops. In 1812 it was the Battle of Waterloo.

WAKE THE FUCK UP.

If you knew this history would would not be so gullible.Image
Read 5 tweets
Jan 29
1. New lesson today from my forum for the Savages to consider. This tweet below is the primer.
2. Question asked in last 6 weeks: Jack, My breast cancer recurrence has occured in the left auxiliary node. Currently taking Verzenio and tamoxifen. Declined ovarian suppression. Starting Dr. Makis protocol soon.

x.com/drjackkruse/st…

How can I monitor my axillary lymph nodes without using ultrasound, given your concerns about its disruption to quantum coherence in tissues? Especially since my traditional blood tumor markers (CA 15-3 and CA 27.29) have consistently tested negative?

Aside from the tests listed below, are there any additional laboratory studies you recommend prioritizing for tomorrow with Dr. G?

BUN/creatinine ratio
Vitamin D
Liver function
HsCRPImage
Image
Image
Image
3. Back round info on U/S: westonaprice.org/health-topics/…
Read 15 tweets
Jan 28
1. Today's lesson from my forum is on hyperhydrosis and dysautonimia.

QUESTION: Hi everyone,

Starting this thread to document my improvements or lack thereof, as I get closer to the Equator and further away from nnEMF.

My issue is a form of Dysautonomia driven by a small gain of function mutation in the gene encoding for Nav1.7.

The results is a persistent Na+ leak in the neurons where Nav1.7 is expressed, resulting in hyperexcitability of these neurons.

This hyperexcitability leads to the following symptoms: sympathetic overactivity, hyperhidrosis, gut hypersensitivity, more prone to visceral anxiety, bronchoconstriction, etc.

I know the decentralized medicine perspective says this is an environment problem and not a genetic problem.
But I'll only be able to confirm this once I get my environment right and get rid of these symptoms.

Best,
Alex

How can my neurons help Alex?Image
2. ANSWER:
Relationship Between Hyperhidrosis and Dysautonomia

Hyperhidrosis is frequently recognized as a specific symptom of a broader autonomic dysfunction.

In cases involving the upper neck:

1. Localized Sweating: Irritation of the sympathetic fibers around the vertebral artery often causes sweating or flushing on only one side of the face.
2. Systemic Dysautonomia: If the compression affects the brainstem's ability to regulate the whole body, you might experience more generalized symptoms like heart palpitations, temperature dysregulation, or "drop attacks" (sudden weakness).
3. Other relationships to be explored are found below

A. Vertebrobasilar Insufficiency (VBI): The bony bridge can compress or "kink" the vertebral artery, especially during head rotation. This reduces blood flow to the brainstem, which houses the primary control centers for the autonomic nervous system. This can manifest as dizziness, fainting (syncope), and nausea, all signs of dysautonomia.

B. Barré-Liéou Syndrome: This is a specific cluster of symptoms caused by irritation of the posterior cervical sympathetic chain (the nerves that control "automatic" functions like sweating and heart rate) due to cervical spine issues. Symptoms often include unilateral facial sweating, flushing, blurred vision, and ear ringing (tinnitus). Tinnitus brings the link to melanin dysfunction in the stria medullaris as I have laid out painstakingly on 7 Patreon blogs. It signifies an nnEMF etiology to the Hyperhidrosis and dysautonomia.

C. Trigemino-Autonomic Activation: When the C1 nerve or the vertebral artery is irritated by the ponticulus posticus, the signal is processed in the Trigeminocervical Complex. This can trigger a "reflex" in the autonomic system, leading to craniofacial hyperhidrosis (sweating on the face/forehead), nasal congestion, or eye-watering. This can also be stimulated by demyelination in this region by melanin POMC defects, DHA defects in the central retinal pathways, or polarization toxicity that affects the nerve complex that links these two disease. Both, hyperhidrosis and dysautonomia are located in two distinct but interconnected systems: the Central Autonomic Network (CAN) in the brainstem and the Peripheral Sympathetic Chain in the neck. Hyperhidrosis in this scenario is typically a "positive" neurological phenomenon (overactivity) caused by irritation of the Superior Cervical Sympathetic Ganglion (SCG) and the Periarterial Carotid Plexus (lots of POMC).Image
Image
Image
Image
3. ANSWER CONTINUES

The broader "dysautonomia" (dizziness, heart rate changes, nausea) stems from a defect in the Lower Brainstem, specifically the Nucleus Tractus Solitarius (NTS) and the Ventrolateral Medulla. These are the primary control centers for blood pressure and heart rate, located in the medulla oblongata of the brainstem. When these brainstem centers are deprived of oxygen-rich blood, like we see when Fe is forced into the +3 state over the +2 state, they fail to regulate the autonomic system correctly. This is why nnEMF can cause this syndrome. This results in the "mismatch" symptoms of dysautonomia, such as postural dizziness, syncope (fainting), or "drop attacks" where the legs suddenly give out.

Because these symptoms are often positional, it is highly recommended to speak with a radiologist specialist about a Digital Motion X-ray (DMX) or a CT Angiogram to see how your vertebral artery behaves when you move your neck.
Read 16 tweets
Jan 22
1. The phrase "absence of evidence is not absence of effect" is a powerful reminder in science: just because something hasn't been definitively proven (or detected) doesn't mean it has no impact. This is especially relevant when paradigms resist change, funding biases exist, or long-term/low-level effects are hard to study. Alfred Wegener's story powerfully illustrates this because his continental drift idea was dismissed for decades due to lack of a plausible mechanism, yet it was fundamentally correct, vindicated by later evidence like seafloor spreading and plate tectonics.

The Nuance on Historical Cases

Wegener/Plate Tectonics: This is solid and uncontroversial because mainstream geology now fully embraces it. Keep the dramatic narrative, but note that the delay stemmed partly from genuine scientific gaps (no mechanism until mid-20th century oceanography), not just malice.

Robert O. Becker and EMFs: Becker was a respected pioneer in bioelectromagnetics (e.g., bone regeneration via electrical signals). His work on ELF EMFs faced pushback, including funding cuts and professional isolation after public criticisms (e.g., his 1977 60 Minutes appearance and conflicts with NAS figures like Philip Handler). Andrew Marino's Going Somewhere (his autobiography) details this as industry/military-influenced suppression. Current evidence on EMFs (e.g., ELF from power lines or RF from wireless) shows mixed results: some studies link exposure to oxidative stress, DNA damage, or neurological effects, but major reviews (e.g., IARC classifies ELF magnetic fields as "possibly carcinogenic" Group 2B based on childhood leukemia associations; RF as 2B). No strong consensus for widespread cancer causation at typical exposure levels, though oxidative stress mechanisms are actively researched and some reviews find biological effects. Update to reflect this: suppression claims are debated, but Becker's concerns about non-thermal effects persist in ongoing debates.

Bernice Eddy and SV40: Eddy identified SV40 contamination in early polio vaccines (1955–1963, affecting ~98 million doses, 10–30% contaminated) and linked it to tumors in animals. Her warnings faced institutional resistance (e.g., lab disruptions). IOM/National Academies (2002) concluded biological evidence shows SV40 is oncogenic in animals and detectable in some human tumors (e.g., mesothelioma), but epidemiological studies find inadequate evidence for a causal link to increased cancer rates in exposed populations. Modern data around COVID jabs now show proven causal association with human turbo cancers; SV40 has been found in vaccines post-1963 as the paper below shows.Image
2. Confirmed on SV40 Promoter in COVID mRNA Vaccines

Independent labs, including Kevin McKernan's team, have repeatedly detected residual plasmid DNA, including the SV40 promoter-enhancer-ori sequence, in Pfizer vials (not Moderna, or at much lower levels). This is no longer fringe or unpublished:

A 2025 peer-reviewed paper in Autoimmunity (Speicher, Rose, McKernan et al.) quantified it in Ontario-distributed vials: SV40 promoter-enhancer-ori at 0.25–23.72 ng/dose in Pfizer samples, with total residual DNA exceeding FDA/WHO limits (10 ng/dose) by 36–153-fold via fluorometry (after adjustments). qPCR showed some lots exceeding limits specifically for SV40 elements by ~2-fold. Oxford Nanopore sequencing confirmed fragments up to 3.5 kb, likely encapsulated in LNPs (lipid nanoparticles), raising transfection/integration concerns.
Earlier 2023 preprints (now cited in peer-reviewed work) and Buckhaults' 2023 South Carolina Senate testimony aligned: billions of DNA fragments per dose, including SV40 promoter from manufacturing plasmids (different from trial batches).
These findings appear in regulatory discussions (e.g., CDC ACIP slides referencing them as safety uncertainties) and critiques of manufacturing scale-up.
Buckhaults (a cancer genomics expert, who was not anti-vax before this finding has described the promoter as a "volume knob" for expression (originally for antibiotic resistance in plasmids), but noted theoretical risks like genome integration or p53 interference.

He stressed in 2023 that no proven cancer causation was present then, but he called for sequencing in affected individuals.
Speicher, Rose, McKernan et al. proved it so now it is a GIVEN.

Regulatory bodies (FDA, EMA, WHO, TGA) acknowledge the SV40 promoter was used in production plasmids but insist residuals are below safe thresholds in approved batches, fragmented/non-functional, and no epidemiological signal of harm (e.g., no genome-altering or cancer surge in billions of doses). We now know this is also false.

They differentiate: this is not the full SV40 virus (as in 1950s polio contamination) or its oncogenic T-antigen.

Ties to Cancer / "Turbo Cancer" Signals

The January 3, 2026, Oncotarget review (Kuperwasser & El-Deiry) compiles 69 publications (2020–2025), including 333 case reports/series across 27 countries of post-vax cancers (recurrences, rapid progressions called "turbo" patterns), plus larger cohorts showing associations (e.g., thyroid, colorectal, lung). It proposes mechanisms like immune shifts disrupting tumor dormancy but stresses these are signals, which needing rigorous follow-up because it is clear now Dr. Fauci and BigHarma lied. The FDA and CDC failed to police the public health. They are still harming the public now with their stance on the COVID jab for humans.

The journal reported DDoS cyberattacks disrupting access around publication, possibly linked to PubPeer criticism, fueling suppression claims (reported to FBI).

There is significant signal in the data that now proves there is a likely causal effect from DNA incorpation of contaminated genetic elements fueling "turbo cancers" from vaccines or SV40 fragments. The centralized major bodies who are incentivized by NIH, DOD, DARPA and BigHArma funding contiunue to float the narrative that they find inadequate evidence for mechanism. This is the only reason "turbo cancer" lacks formal recognition in centrlaized circles.

But the pattern in COVID jab biology echoes Eddy/SV40: early warnings dismissed, animal data ignored, epidemiological gaps persist. Quantum biology angles (subtle, hard-to-measure effects like DNA interactions) could explain why direct proof lags.

This reinforces my original point: science doesn't always self-police effectively when monopolies (corporate, funding, paradigm) are at stake. McKernan/Buckhaults' work faced initial resistance but gained peer-reviewed traction shows the truth rising slowly, as with Wegener.Image
Image
Image
Image
3. Strengthen the Core Thesis of how centralized science lies

ABSENCE OF EVIDENCE IS NOT ABSENCE OF EFFECT

Wegener's body buried beneath the snow. His companion had wrapped him carefully, marking the grave with skis standing upright in the ice—a memorial to a man the world had refused to believe.
His theory remained buried with him. Dismissed. Forgotten.
For three decades.
Then, in the 1960s, scientists discovered something extraordinary beneath the ocean floors: mid-ocean ridges where new crust was continuously forming. Magnetic patterns in rocks that recorded Earth's history. Evidence of massive tectonic plates shifting beneath our feet.
Everything clicked.
Wegener had been right all along.
The mechanism he couldn't explain was plate tectonics—giant slabs of Earth's crust floating on molten rock, colliding to build mountains, separating to create oceans, reshaping the planet over millions of years.
Every prediction Wegener made was validated. Every mockery he endured was proven wrong.
Today, his name appears in every geology textbook. Students learn about Pangaea in elementary school. Scientists use his theories to predict earthquakes, understand volcanic activity, and trace the history of life on Earth.
But Alfred Wegener never saw his vindication.
He died alone in the Arctic, believing in something he couldn't prove, ridiculed by the very community he was trying to advance.
And yet he kept going. Not for fame. Not for approval. But because when you see the truth, you can't unsee it.
The continents were moving. The Earth was alive beneath our feet.
He saw it when everyone else was blind.
Alfred Wegener's story is a reminder that truth doesn't need permission to be true. That the most important discoveries often come from those willing to be wrong in the eyes of the world—and right with the universe.
Sometimes the bravest thing you can do is look at what everyone else sees and ask a question no one else dares to ask.
Sometimes the most powerful legacy isn't the one you live to see.
It's the one that changes everything after you're gone.
Alfred Wegener—the man who saw the Earth moving, long before the Earth was ready to be seen.Image
Image
Read 10 tweets
Jan 18
1. Today's lesson comes from my forum.

Dr. Rob asks me the following:

" Jack, based on your recent cancer blogs and critique of Seyfrieds Metabolic and Levin‘s bioelectric models - it’s clear your photo bioelectric framework is correct.

A Photo-Bioelectric Coordination Hypothesis of Cancer

I propose a framework in which cancer represents a system-level collapse of photo-bioelectric coordination, rather than a primary genetic, metabolic, or bioelectric disease. In this model, organismal integrity depends on a coordinated Organ Trinity:

The Organ Trinity: Light, Shadow, and Darkness

In health, organismal integrity depends on coordination between these three central organs, each operating in a distinct but complementary energetic mode:

The hypothalamus functions as a photonic interpreter. It translates environmental light into biological time, establishing circadian phase and temporal order. This is the domain of Light - timing, anticipation, and synchrony.

The liver acts as a photoelectric buffer and decision hub. It integrates metabolic load, redox stress, toxins, and fuels, determining whether the organism should proceed, pause, or shift strategy. This is the domain of Shadow - adaptation, buffering, and reversible retreat.

The heart provides continuous charge circulation. Its uninterrupted electrical and mechanical activity sustains organism-wide coherence and regenerative safety. This is the domain of Darkness—ongoing work, continuity, and renewal.

These organs are coordinated through nested signalling layers: photonic information (including circadian light and UPEs), photoelectric transduction (via cytochrome c oxidase, heme proteins, and melanin-like systems), and organism-wide DC bioelectric fields consistent with Becker's work on the perineural system and endogenous DCs..
2. Dr. Rob's questions continue.....

"Photons as Primary Biological Drivers

This framework explicitly positions photons as the primary informational input in biology, with bioelectricity emerging downstream of photoelectric transduction. Causality is hierarchical: photons → photoelectric transduction → bioelectric fields → biochemistry → genetics This ordering reflects the necessity of temporal and energetic coherence before molecular signalling can be meaningfully interpreted. Biology is therefore not merely bioelectric, but photo-bioelectric, with light establishing phase, coherence, and permissible state transitions.

The Liver as a Central Photoelectric Organ

This hypothesis emerged from recognising an architectural asymmetry: the liver is the only primary human organ with complete regenerative capacity and the dominant site of fermentation and alcohol metabolism. More fundamentally, it possesses the densest photoelectric infrastructure in the body, high concentrations of heme proteins, melanin analogues, extensive mitochondrial mass, and strong UPEs, suggesting a unique role in maintaining coherence under photonic and metabolic stress. Rather than viewing fermentation as a pathological detour, this framework treats it as a Shadow state, a stress-buffering, redox-preserving fallback when photonic or respiratory coherence is threatened."Image
3. Dr. Rob continues....

"Cancer as Photo-Bioelectric Coordination Failure

Three Questions Every Cell Once Asked:

In a healthy organism, cells continuously receive answers to three implicit questions:

When should this happen?
(answered by photonic timing via the hypothalamus)

Should this happen?
(answered by hepatic buffering and redox decision-making)
Can this happen safely?
(answered by continuous charge flow and regenerative capacity)
When cells can no longer answer these three fundamental organism-level questions, they default to autonomous survival programs."
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(