The End Times Profile picture
Jun 25 9 tweets 2 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
In some ways the difference between left and right is that the left will create a sense of belonging and community which it holds over the heads of people with the threat of leaving them isolated, while the right cuts to the chase and just tells them to kill themselves up front.
The left will spend decades carefully building up institutional capacity through NGOs and associations, weaving their way into the lives of young people and becoming the default against which other things are measured; the right will say, hey, prove you’re not defective.
The left will slowly insert itself into every aspect of life until every last random consumer product and cultural meeting point is bug-eyed Capital-W Woke and demands you be as well to stay in its good graces; the right will say: mentoring? Fuck you. Bootstraps, f*gg*t.
Black Bloc vs. Nude Fascist Bodybuilding; fanatics vs. grifters; bureaucratic creatures of process vs. individual charismatic degenerates; Mass Media vs. anons; the dynamic of the terrified conditional collective vs. self-absorbed antisocial individual reoccurs again and again.
There is absolutely no place for anyone who wants a normal quiet life in any of this.
The left’s approach worked when it was the counterculture: it didn’t have to create real ideals or build people up or make anything work. The right’s worked when it was the overculture: it could rely on natural associations and shared social links to supply the things it scorned.
Reverse the social positions and you end up with a left which is monumentally incompetent at what it controls, which is everything, and more incompetent the more exclusive its control is; and a right that offers nothing but contempt to people left adrift or seeking connection.
The result is that for any ordinary person the experience of dealing with true believers on either side is like getting kicked in the fucking head, over and over and over. Do you want plastic smiles and the fear of what any mistake could bring, or do you want to die alone?
There is no moral to this story other than that there are no friends in politics and no one has your back. Nothing planted here will grow; seek your garden elsewhere.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with The End Times

The End Times Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @TheAgeofShoddy

Jun 18
Always it comes back to this: a demand for people to stop trying to understand the world or exert any control over it, because they are not legitimate actors with any right to do so. It is the fundamental assumption of totalitarianism, whatever other trappings it takes on.
Every excuse of this kind is an attempt to set up an unchallengeable source of absolute authority that people must pay deference to, no matter the cost. Science, God, the state, “progress,” a book, the nation, men cycle through justifications, but the same impulse remains below.
If science does not wish to be questioned, then it should *stop seeking power over us*. No one made Peter Hotez demand the right to control the lives of hundreds of millions of people; he sought that on his own, and he has no right to remove that demand from public questioning.
Read 4 tweets
Jun 18
The mistake here is to think that formats which privilege useless, badly-designed, often fraudulent arguments which steal the name of “study” is innately better. But this is the same demand as “debate me”- an attempt to load the deck on fundamental questions to avoid scrutiny.
The act of dismissing any ideas or perspectives that you don’t value as inherently untruthful is itself an almost textbook definition of bad faith; and there it is right in the dead center of a defense of “the science.”

This is a desperate claim of privilege, no more or less. Image
If “the science” is in able to make itself comprehensible to the public then it has no claim on their deference or allegiance any more than does the priest of any other faith. If science can only “breathe” in an environment hostile to humanity, perhaps it should stay there. Image
Read 4 tweets
Jun 16
People carrying high school with them too far into life is a recognized trope, but there’s a second phase of it in which people finally settling down in middle age and people who were always settled and self-consciously boring regard each other with a complex tangle of emotions.
They more people make it into their 30’s and 40’s without lasting marriages, the more of a fault line this is going to become. People finally feeling things tilt their way but only as a last option, people still terrified of “settling,” seeing old resentments in each other, etc.
Reluctant change and bitter stasis locked together at the bargaining table, both honor-bound to all of the selves they were before they sat down to pay respect to every night they sat alone or spent with someone they no longer quite remember. The heart howls in compromise.
Read 4 tweets
Jun 15
You can pick apart the individual biography and choices of any one person who presents their situation as a major collective problem, but if you have to do this over and over and over, maybe it actually is a collective problem. And that may require a policy response.
In this situation there’s two real answers:

1) This problem is not amenable to state action, because (reasons).

2) This is our plan to deal with the problem.

If you choose neither you effectively lose a default judgment, and those are hard to undo in the court of politics.
I get that no one on the right wants to pay for their class enemies to do the fabled underwater basketweaving degrees; but you should care about leveraging the opportunity to create a system which produces fewer impoverished and radicalized debtors with nothing to conserve.
Read 4 tweets
Jun 14
Seems an open question about whether this is a benefit, a loss, or simply a push to zoomers and subsequent generations. I already find the endless repetition of culture agonizing, but then again I remember when culture wasn’t repetition. How does it feel if you grow up with this?
Read 5 tweets
Jun 13
One theory is that urban disorder represents, to a certain kind of young man, the idea of opportunity for physical adventure of the kind young men have always sought, and which seems otherwise unavailable now for various reasons. It is their idea of how to prove manhood.
You can’t join the military because Our Kind Doesn’t Do that, and you won’t become a firefighter because there are class expectations around education, but you can tell yourself almost often enough to believe it that you proved something by living in a gritty, tough city.
This is, to a certain sort, a perfect bargain: you don’t have to actually do anything (you get cred while sitting in class at NYU or a bar in Bushwick), and real violence is rare enough to pose an acceptable degree of risk while heavily reported-on to create the right impression.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(