Since the beginning of Russia's invasion of Ukraine, analysts & officials have claimed that Putin will never back down; that he needs a facing-saving win (i.e. Ukrainian territory) to end his war. Events yesterday completely undermined that assumption. 1/ THREAD
Putin talked tough in his national address. He sounded like someone preparing for a big fight. But when faced with the difficult decision of trying to stop Wagner mercenaries with major force, he backed down. 2/
He didn't escalate. He didn't need a face-saving off-ramp to declare victory. When facing the possibility of really losing to Wagner mercenaries coming into Moscow, he just capitulated. 3/
Instead of doubling down with more force to crush the mutiny, Putin accepted humiliation instead. He was the rat trapped in the corner that so many Putinologists have told us to fear. But he didn't lash out & go crazy. He negotiated & with a traitor. 4/
The lesson for the war in Ukraine is clear. Putin is more likely to negotiate and end his war if he is losing on the battlefield. Those who have argued that Ukraine must not attack Crimea for fear of triggering escalation must now reevaluate that hypothesis. 5/
The sooner Putin fears he is losing the war, the faster he will negotiate. 6/END
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
"Sixth and finally, there are even signs of cracks within Putin’s ruling elite. When you are losing the battle, the blame game begins. This is precisely what is happening in Russia today." 1/ THREAD
"Putin recently replaced his commander in Ukraine, General Sergei Surovikin, after only a few months in the job. Out of desperation, Putin has allowed several private armies to fight in Ukraine — including, most prominently, the Wagner Group, headed by Evgeny Prigozhin." 2/
"...Russia’s generals have shown little enthusiasm for the efforts of the mercenaries and their leader, who accused Russia’s top brass of treason for failing to provide his men with ammunition during the ongoing bloody battle for control of the Ukrainian city of Bakhmut." 3/
"Sixth and finally, there are even signs of cracks within Putin’s ruling elite. When you are losing the battle, the blame game begins. This is precisely what is happening in Russia today. " 1/ THREAD
"Putin recently replaced his commander in Ukraine, General Sergei Surovikin, after only a few months in the job. Out of desperation, Putin has allowed several private armies to fight in Ukraine — including, most prominently, the Wagner Group, headed by Evgeny Prigozhin." 2/
"Not surprisingly, Russia’s generals have shown little enthusiasm for the efforts of the mercenaries and their leader, who accused Russia’s top brass of treason for failing to provide his men with ammunition during the ongoing bloody battle for control..." 3/
My piece from earlier this year: "A fascist coup also is very unlikely. First, none of the names listed above [including Prigzhin] are charismatic leaders with mass followings in Russian society." 1/
"Nearly two decades of dictatorship have denied them the permissive conditions for cultivating such an image or a movement." 2/
"Second, Putin has invested heavily in Russian intelligence services. As a former KGB agent, he fully understands the power of surveillance. The act of plotting a coup would be extremely dangerous in Russia’s current police state." 3/
"The Biden administration has done an excellent job of sustaining the effort, in close cooperation with our NATO allies, to supply Ukraine with the materiel, economic aid, intelligence and training it needs to win against the Russian invasion." 1/ THREAD
"Now, it’s time to bring our diplomacy up to the same level. We need to launch a diplomatic surge to help Kyiv navigate peace negotiations, rebuild Ukraine and sustain economic pressure on Russia to help win the peace." 2/
"First, President Biden should appoint a special envoy for peace talks." 3/
Twitter is a hard place for nuance. I have written volumes on this subject for decades. My talk on the war on YouTube (over a million views) treats NATO expansion as a variable, not a constant, as do my academic writings. Happy to discuss in detail. Not here. 1/
In invading Georgia in 2008, Putin ended any momentum (& there wasn't much even before that horrific event) for Georgia or Ukraine to join NATO. Tragic Fact #1. 1/
In invading Ukraine in 2014, Putin successfully stopped even the very minuscule efforts to bring Georgia & Ukraine closer to NATO. Tragic Fact #2. 2/
From the NATO Bucharest summit in 2008 until Putin's major invasion of Ukraine in 2022, there was almost zero progress -- not even baby steps -- towards bringing Georgia and Ukraine into NATO. Tragic Fact #3. 3/