Mo Chatra Profile picture
Jun 26 17 tweets 3 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
Liverpool's deal with Nike enters its penultimate season, which means the club are to commence negotiations during 23/24 with the sportswear giant on potentially extending the deal.

Below is a thread setting out its importance to the club, and what factors will influence talks.
The deal was entered into from the start of the 20/21 Premier League campaign, following a court case with former kit manufacturing partner, New Balance, where NB tried unsuccessfully to argue that it had matched Nike's offer and should therefore continue as LFC's partner.
During the court case it emerged that the New Balance deal was generating for the club far more money than it claimed publicly- in 18/19, it emerged that the deal generated £64m (off of 1.8m in kit sales).
By the time the New Balance deal ended in 19/20, it will have generated comfortably north of £70m and perhaps even in excess of the £79m generated by United's adidas deal (kit sales in 19/20 for LFC were up a whopping 59%).
Entering into a deal with Nike for a guaranteed sum of only £30m looked like a risky proposition, on that basis. However, it appears that the New Balance deal was structured along similar lines.
The Nike deal also sets out that Liverpool makes 20% of net sales of kit and other apparel (e.g. training kit and other Nike branded clothing) whereas 5% of net sales for footwear was also negotiated.
The club releases minimal information about kit sales, but in both 20/21 and 21/22, the club did report record kit sales, which would suggest units being shifted in excess of the 2.9m figure for 19/20 that emerged in the High Court during the NB court case.
This has been corroborated to me by industry sources, including from a rival manufacturer- Liverpool's kit sales outstripped that of any Premier League club in the 20/21 and 21/22 seasons; though I don't have any information as yet on the 22/23 season.
Liverpool's overall commercial revenue the last few years has been as follows:
16/17: £137m
17/18: £154m
18/19: £188m
19/20: £217m
20/21: £218m
21/22: £247m
19/20 saw a big jump in revenue of £29m- this will have been driven by an extension (on improved terms) for the Standard Chartered deal as well as likely a sound uplift on the £64m generated in 18/19 from the NB deal.
21/22 saw a further £29m jump on the previous deal, which was driven partly by the reopening of retail outlets and stadium tours post-lockdown, but also through greater success from the Nike deal.
During 22/23, that deal was further diversified through new Le Bron James collaborations as well as product lines released through Nike's Converse brand. Further collaboration and new product lines are expected during 23/24.
Based on overall growth levels for the commercial department, it's not a stretch to suggest the Nike deal is now generating in excess of £90m a season for Liverpool, which makes it by far the most important partnership for the club from a revenue generating perspective.
Going into negotiations during a season in which Liverpool will not be competing in the Champions League is clearly not ideal, but it shouldn't have a material impact so long as both parties are confident that absence from UEFA's premier club competition is a single season blip.
All that said, Nike will look to drive a deal that doesn't risk a situation where the club looks elsewhere, but realistically, only adidas have the scale and size to offer a deal that could potentially compete with anything tabled by Nike in its fullest sense.
The current deal does appear to be one both Nike and Liverpool are very happy with, so I'd be stunned if the partnership does end in 24/25. However, I go back to my earlier point- Nike will want confidence that Liverpool will continue to be a major player in world football.
One of the strongest ways of evidencing this to Nike is to ensure the club gets good business done in the current transfer window and, subsequently, makes a strong start to the Premier League campaign.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Mo Chatra

Mo Chatra Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MoChatra

May 25
Despite the loss of Champions League football next season, Liverpool's turnover should still remain very healthy and not far off the level club will achieve for 22/23.
Revenue levels this season are likely to be in the region of £580m (slightly below last season's record £594m). Next season, I estimate that the club's turnover will be marginally lower, at approximately £570m.
This is broken down as:
Broadcast- £210m
Commercial- £265m
Matchday- £95m
Read 7 tweets
Apr 12
FSG had several parties ready to make very big offers in recent months but nobody was willing to go up to £4.5bn+ (which is what would be enough for JWH to part ways with Liverpool). It was Mr. Henry that made the ultimate - not unanimous - call not to entertain any offers.
He chose for FSG to remain as custodians of Liverpool not because he feels the club's fortunes will be stronger with his group at the helm; rather, it's purely a money call. JWH would rather wait, feeling that the club's value will continue to appreciate.
They remain for now, but the upcoming window is the biggest test of their ownership. They rode out several storms in the past over past transfer window cock-ups, ESL, ticket prices, furlough, etc. Apologies from JWH calmed people down. Now, he is all out of apologies.
Read 5 tweets
Apr 5
There is increasing chatter that FSG will be soon be selling a minority stake in Liverpool Football Club. Countless performances this season have shown that a sizeable overhaul of the first team squad is needed. Will FSG use proceeds from the sale to swell the transfer kitty?
The hope and expectation will be that FSG do make most or all of the funds generated from the sale to boost the club's finances. In terms of how much FSG might generate, it will depend on how much of a stake they sell.
Sale of a 10% stake should generate at least £300m. Parting with double that should rake in at least £600m. For context, ADUG sold a 13.8% stake in City Football Group to a Chinese investment fund for £265m in 2015 and 10% to US-based Silver Lake in 2019 for £389m.
Read 13 tweets
Jan 19
The Deloitte Football Money League has, for the first time, revealed some of Liverpool Football Club's key financial information for the 2021/22 season. Though the information made available is limited, it still throws up some interesting insight. Here, I share my analysis...
Firstly, the turnover generated by Liverpool is a record-high for the club (£594m). Turnover is worked out through three key revenue streams:
broadcast (£266m)
commercial (£233m)
matchday (£95m).
It doesn't factor in revenue from player sales (more on that later).
It is important to stress that is purely income; it does not mean Liverpool had £594m available to spend on whatever it wishes. Nay, most of that is committed to various costs- notably the wage bill which, according to the Deloitte report, amounted to 62% of turnover (£368m)
Read 25 tweets
Jan 3
2023 is shaping up to be one of the most pivotal years in the history of Liverpool Football Club. Decisions that need to be made will alter the course of its history for a long time to come. Key amongst them is a choice FSG need to make- stay or go. For me, it's obvious- go.
Some will disagree with this, but they have done some wonderful things for Liverpool. Made inspired recruitment decisions (e.g. Klopp, Edwards). Modernised Anfield. Upgraded training facilities. Improved management structures within the club. Grown key revenue streams.
However, we are clearly at a stage where Fenway Sports Group's model is no longer fit for purpose. It brought about stability when it was needed, but their efforts to ensure the self-sustaining financial model can make Liverpool competitive have frankly failed.
Read 24 tweets
Dec 12, 2022
IF Liverpool were to sign Jude Bellingham and Enzo Fernández at a combined cost of £200m or more, financing the deals would be feasible. Signing both would not require the full amounts to be paid at once to Dortmund and Benfica respectively.
Fernández has a reported release clause of €120m (£103m). This isn't necessarily the same as a buyout clause where a specified figure has to be paid in full 'by the player' (though really by the purchasing club)- there can be scope for negotiation of the fee structure.
In addition, though Fernández's release clause might be set at €120m, Liverpool would still be able to negotiate the fee down to a lesser amount if Benfica were open to this.
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(