1. Let’s talk about this. You should care. This understanding of humanity is a big part of why America is so messed up and the culture war is happening at all. This idea that what I do in private with other consenting adults does not affect other people. This is deeply wrong. 🧵
2. The above worldview assumes that we are, as human beings, all fully autonomous individuals, monads which are morally and spiritually isolated and disconnected from each other. We have no connection whatsoever on any level with any other human being.
3. This worldview asserts that any bonds which I make with any other person are completely and fully voluntary, and based entirely on our mutual consent which can be withdrawn at any time without effect. My actions are uniquely my own.
4. This, if a person does something by themselves or two people consent to do things together, their actions do not affect any other persons in any way. We as human beings are fully discreet entities. Privacy creates a kind of protective seal that walls off my actions.
5. In this worldview, the only discussion becomes that of the age of consent and under what conditions can consent be adequately assumed. The power dynamics of consent become the only true moral question. This is true of life and death. If I consent, you should be able to kill me
6. This worldview is a denial, though, of much of how we experience the world. It is a denial of the idea that we share any collective life together at all with any other human beings. The very idea of a culture is not a thing.
7. We all know intuitively that this is not the case. Friends develop a “bond.” We connect with people. We develop deep marriage bonds. Families have a unique shared character, a connection that is based on genetics as well as the life they live together.
8. These bonds are unseen an intangible, spiritual you might say. And they scale upwards to a community. We all recognize that other cultures are different than our own and they share a character that is unique to them as a group.
9. This idea that people are morally autonomous beings unconnected to others is an relatively recent innovation in thinking. Throughout most of history it was assumed that we as human beings were connected through a shared human nature.
10. This idea of a shared human nature asserts that we as human beings are all bound together to other human beings at a metaphysical level. Much of the core of Christian theology is built on this understanding, original sin and the mechanics of salvation assume a human nature.
11. We know this to be true. In a marriage, if the husband is in the privacy of his own room looking at porn, this is not his own choice that has no effect on his wife or his children. It’s a betrayal. Not only that, it corrupts his relationship with his wife.
12. In the same way, because of our shared human nature, our cultural and communal bonds, the things which we do in private affect the shared collective life we have as a people. We are like a body. If one part is sick, the whole body is sick.
13. All of these degenerate sexual practices, even when done in private, and done consensually, do negatively impact the whole of society. They make us collectively sicker and more degenerate as a culture, as a people.
14. So, yes, you should care what is happening in people’s bedrooms. Their degeneracy is making you more degenerate. Or at the very least, it makes it harder for you act in a way that is virtuous. It prevents society collectively from acting virtuously.
15. And if you cannot stir yourself to protect yourself and your culture, the very fact that they are doing it puts your children at risk. Do you really want your children to grow up in a society filled with closet degenerates?
16. Addendum: it has been interesting to see how many Americans simply accept the breakdown of the social fabric as normal. Bedroom morality used to be enforced by communities. Eventually, if communities don’t impose morality, the state will: seekingthehiddenthing.com/p/the-loss-of-…
2. Is the idea of the Heritage American a political counter-propaganda, a product of mass media or is it an organic identity akin to an ethnicity? Is it unified politically? What percentage of people identified as Heritage American actually think of themselves as such?
3. Do they have a singular existential desire to survive as a distinct people separate from America in the main? I would suspect that most Heritage Americans identity as much with America as they do Heritage America. They are not like the Quebecois.
1. Here is the thing. Burke is not really a "conservative." Burkean "conservatism" is the kind of thing that works in theory but cannot be instantiated in reality. It's the kind of thing that works on TV, but not in reality. The problem is that it never actually conserves anything.
2. My political journey has been to realize that the "conservatism" of the @erinotoole's of the world isn't really conservatism at all. It is merely a kinder, gentler liberalism. They believe in things like the "rule of law" which facilitated the managerial takeover of society.
3. In many ways, so-called "conservatives" like @erinotoole are the true believers in liberal democracy and the thing that they are most desirous to "conserve" are the forms and institutions of liberalism.
There was a time when the activities of the market were thought about under the umbrella of ethics, morality and religion, instead of as they are now as a "scientific" area of study. The idea of a "free" market comes about as a result of this transition.
2. The reason why this transition took place is that if what happens in the market is merely the result of impersonal forces such as "supply and demand" that can be quantified and measured, then this absolves the participants in business and the market from the moral responsibility for their decisions.
3. Thus activities like layoffs, offshoring of production, lowering wage costs, dumping, and a host of other business decisions are no longer looked at morally; rather, they are just seen as "good business."
The Laurentian elites saw this as the impending future of Canada and realized that this very dynamic threatened their power and so Mark Carney was brought in to quietly “fix the glitch.”
2. Mark Carney is a manager’s manager. The chairman of two national banks, his way will not be the firebrand. There will be no anti-immigrant propaganda. On the surface all will look the same. But under the hood, changes will be made. They will quietly “fix the glitch.”
3. So what we see in Canada is that programs are being quietly cut and targets are being adjusted to cut back on immigration just enough to not crash the housing market. Statistics Canada is now reporting that Canada is in a zero population growth situation.
1. One of the primary manifestations of the decadence and nihilism of our time is that our society is gripped by “high time preference” thinking masquerading as a form of nobility, in terms of “rights” or making the youth earn their way and other drivel like this.
2. This results in women who will sacrifice their own children, whether murdering them in the womb or simply refusing to have them for little more than a cubicle job, the freedom to travel or eat out at cool bistros. Everything is about today.
High time preference.
3. It results in Boomers spending their inheritance that would otherwise be passed on to their children on cruises and other enjoyments today.
Politically, they borrowed on their children’s prosperity to buy votes through social programs.
1. I think we need to pause and think about what former Canadian Prime Minister is saying here in a speech he gave in Saskatchewan recently.
As Harper himself states, even a year ago he would have urged Canada to deepen its ties with the US.
Now he is advocating the opposite.
2. What does it all mean? Harper is speaking on different levels here.
On one level he is signalling to his Alberta power base, the people who put him in power, the Western Elites, that as much as they hate the Laurentian Elites, Canada’s best future is not with the US.
3. This is his way of saying that they need to stop arguing with the Laurentian Elites in Ontario and Quebec who dominate Canada’s national politics and begin working together to develop new markets for Canadian resources. Stop sabre rattling that you are going to leave.