κρῠπτός Profile picture
Jun 27, 2023 18 tweets 4 min read Read on X
1. Let’s talk about this. You should care. This understanding of humanity is a big part of why America is so messed up and the culture war is happening at all. This idea that what I do in private with other consenting adults does not affect other people. This is deeply wrong. 🧵
2. The above worldview assumes that we are, as human beings, all fully autonomous individuals, monads which are morally and spiritually isolated and disconnected from each other. We have no connection whatsoever on any level with any other human being.
3. This worldview asserts that any bonds which I make with any other person are completely and fully voluntary, and based entirely on our mutual consent which can be withdrawn at any time without effect. My actions are uniquely my own.
4. This, if a person does something by themselves or two people consent to do things together, their actions do not affect any other persons in any way. We as human beings are fully discreet entities. Privacy creates a kind of protective seal that walls off my actions.
5. In this worldview, the only discussion becomes that of the age of consent and under what conditions can consent be adequately assumed. The power dynamics of consent become the only true moral question. This is true of life and death. If I consent, you should be able to kill me
6. This worldview is a denial, though, of much of how we experience the world. It is a denial of the idea that we share any collective life together at all with any other human beings. The very idea of a culture is not a thing.
7. We all know intuitively that this is not the case. Friends develop a “bond.” We connect with people. We develop deep marriage bonds. Families have a unique shared character, a connection that is based on genetics as well as the life they live together.
8. These bonds are unseen an intangible, spiritual you might say. And they scale upwards to a community. We all recognize that other cultures are different than our own and they share a character that is unique to them as a group.
9. This idea that people are morally autonomous beings unconnected to others is an relatively recent innovation in thinking. Throughout most of history it was assumed that we as human beings were connected through a shared human nature.
10. This idea of a shared human nature asserts that we as human beings are all bound together to other human beings at a metaphysical level. Much of the core of Christian theology is built on this understanding, original sin and the mechanics of salvation assume a human nature.
11. We know this to be true. In a marriage, if the husband is in the privacy of his own room looking at porn, this is not his own choice that has no effect on his wife or his children. It’s a betrayal. Not only that, it corrupts his relationship with his wife.
12. In the same way, because of our shared human nature, our cultural and communal bonds, the things which we do in private affect the shared collective life we have as a people. We are like a body. If one part is sick, the whole body is sick.
13. All of these degenerate sexual practices, even when done in private, and done consensually, do negatively impact the whole of society. They make us collectively sicker and more degenerate as a culture, as a people.
14. So, yes, you should care what is happening in people’s bedrooms. Their degeneracy is making you more degenerate. Or at the very least, it makes it harder for you act in a way that is virtuous. It prevents society collectively from acting virtuously.
15. And if you cannot stir yourself to protect yourself and your culture, the very fact that they are doing it puts your children at risk. Do you really want your children to grow up in a society filled with closet degenerates?
16. Addendum: it has been interesting to see how many Americans simply accept the breakdown of the social fabric as normal. Bedroom morality used to be enforced by communities. Eventually, if communities don’t impose morality, the state will: seekingthehiddenthing.com/p/the-loss-of-…
18. This piece of mine goes into the topic of individualism and Christian teaching: seekingthehiddenthing.com/p/the-christia…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with κρῠπτός

κρῠπτός Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @_kruptos

May 7
1. There are two groups of “conservative” Christians. One group, like Neil here, argues that Christians must fully participate in “polite society,” whether for career purposes or engage in evangelism, the price of said participation is to ignore many obvious social realities.
2. Rather than doing the hard work of finding Christian language to point out glaring problems occurring not just in America, but across the west — often funded by the US government as we have found out recently — we instead must just simply look away.
3. Whether it is discrimination against white men, especially young white men coming of age, the gynocentric nature of our society, or the maintenance of the myths like the “post war consensus,” or racial disparities in criminality, or the negative effects of mass immigration, or the whole Israel/Jewish thing…
Read 15 tweets
May 6
1. I am beginning to think “slop” is the wrong word. I get the associations to Indian street food and the sense of disgust it evokes. The content that we call “slop” is not some generic gruel produced merely to be edible.

What we call “slop” is the exact opposite of this.
2. What we call “slop” is deliberately manipulative to game the system, game the meta so to speak — to put it in the language of 40k — to find a “combo” that guarantees victory without much skill or intelligence. The kind of list that a middling tactician can use to win.
3. As soon as someone smart figures out the combo, thousands of midwits embrace it and push it for “wins.” They are looking for a shortcut, for an advantage that they can use to overcome their deficiencies.
Read 15 tweets
May 6
1. Jacques Ellul talks about this feature of technique and the technological society, that process becomes more important than outcomes.

This is why Ellul compared “technique,” that is, the way of thinking that produces technology, as a similar to casting magical spells.
2. How many times have been in some administrative context where participants spend all their time emphasizing process, as if good results will magically emerge from a perfected process.
3. This is similar to the rituals of spell casting. If you get the incantations right, use the right spell ingredients, make the right hand gestures, you can control reality in specific ways. The correct process results in the spell working.
Read 17 tweets
May 3
1. There is a lot going on here in this short video. This woman is obviously feeling a fair bit of internal stress.

Why?

I get the sense that, in spite of her protestations, that she is feeling very trapped. Trapped by conflicting expectations.
2. Her identity is very much shaped by external influences, associations, demands and perceptions. She embraced a certain set of expectations that were presented to her. You are decently attractive. Relatively smart. If you want status, you need to get an education and work.
3. This is what she set about to do. And the vibe she gives off is that she is feeling betrayed.

She addresses the video to her own party. I assume this means “Republicans.” In her mind somehow being “conservative” and a career girl are completely compatible.
Read 16 tweets
Apr 26
1. For those of us on the right, we need to begin thinking about politics in terms of competing interests and not ideology or policies.

Why is this?

Because all policy and all broad ideological frameworks work for managerialism and the administrative state.

A thread.🧵
2. All policy begs the question of how will it be enacted? It gets enacted through the administrative system, that is how. In this sense, all policy proposals validate and reinforces the administrative state as the singular form of governance.
3. The other thing that policy does is it reinforces an ideological way of looking at the world. Ideology is essentially a way of thinking about the world which says that ideas can be applied to reality to improve or fix the current state of things.
Read 29 tweets
Apr 25
1. Yes. Trump basically needs to go to war with the administrative state. They must think of it not as a tool to be utilized, but rather as an enemy that must be defeated.
2. Even then, “the administrative state” is not a neutral, empty vessel waiting to be filled with political and ideological content. No, it must be properly understood primarily as a way of thinking, a way of approaching problems that has been instantiated across society.
3. The institutions were built to realize a technological approach to society’s problems. As such, they are inherently progressive and utopian, always looking to use technical means to engineer solutions to society’s problems.
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(