Kevin McKernan Profile picture
Jun 28 12 tweets 4 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
Something @lifebiomedguru alerted me to many moons ago.
There is another 1252 amino acid Open Reading Frame across the spike mRNA. Given the mRNA is all Crick strand this should never exist in the vaccine unless the plasmid is there providing the Watson strand that codes for it
It does not have Kozak consensus (signal for making proteins) sequence or a promoter (signal for making mRNA).
However Internal Ribosomal Entry Sites (IRES) are not easy to predict computationally. They must be experimentally determined.
T7 Polymerase is known to strand flip.
This means while its making mRNA on the crick strand, if it runs into a hairpin in the RNA, it can flip strands and start copying the other direction. Its never helpful to have the reverse strand be a full in frame ORF. Most codon optimizations prevent this.
In codon optimizations, You have the freedom to change the wobble bases to make stop codons when read in reverse. They didn't do this.
jbc.org/article/S0021-…
The EMA had a lot of questions regarding the dsRNA contamination. Pfizer is measuring this with an ELISA assay that might be blind to N1-methyl pseudouridine.

https://t.co/99kEjR6sR4nature.com/articles/s4159…
An artifact we witnessed in RNA-Seq.

When you sequence mRNA it should all be Crick strand (Sense strand). The opposite strand is called the Watson strand (Anti-sense). In this case both the Watson and Crick strands are sense due to the reverse ORF.
You can see this
when we sequence RNA. The T7 promoter stick out like a sore thumb(2100). That where the mRNA is being expressed from. The material before it has equal ratio of Watson/Crick sequence. Thats the DNA plasmid backbone. What you should see after the T7 promoter is all Crick strand.
We don't see that. We see areas of more Watson than Crick sequence. Thats dsRNA contamination.

We need other tools to quantitate this.
We could tile 30 qPCR amplicons across the target and measure before and after treatment with RNase iF.
bmcbiotechnol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.11…
RNase If only chews single stranded RNA. leaving dsRNA behind.
Or use the read counts and strandedness in RNA-Seq to estimate it. This is likely the most informative approach.
30 qPCR assays would have to be SYBR green qPCR to keep the costs down.
The codon optimization did change the hairpin potential. N1-methyl pseudoU likely makes these more stable.
Not certain what this means other than it is an avoidable problem in codon optimization and 1252 amino acids coding on both strands is a hell of a feat.
This is only seen in BNT162b2. Haven't looked in their Omicron sequence yet.
The strandedness map above is for Moderna. The Pfizer RNA-Seq created a truncated sequence (7479bp) compared to the sequencing we did using RNase to get rid of the RNA (7810bp). Asimil ar pattern emerges with Pfizer. In this case the plasmid T7 promoter is running Right to left

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Kevin McKernan

Kevin McKernan Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Kevin_McKernan

Jun 23
CONFIRMED:
Independent CLIA Lab, Milford Diagnostics Sanger sequences the vaccine derived amplicons described in our Preprint.

This demonstrates that the CT scores shown in our P'print are in fact on target signal of vector contamination in the vaccine. https://t.co/Kxw9qiYCTZosf.io/b9t7m/
Sanger Sequencing of PCR products is the gold standard in molecular diagnostics. This is something many of the COVID qPCR kits skipped before launching their kits onto the WHO website and amplifying this 'pandemic'.
4 other groups have reproduced various aspects of this finding.
One group in Japan downloaded our ILMN data and reassembled it finding the same vector.
Another group performed qPCR with SYBR green. Showed Low CT scores.
@raoult_didier mentioned it in a video (data not shown).
Read 22 tweets
Jun 21
I get one of these a day now.
I’ve been friendly to the fact checkers that approach with humility.

This one comes with a ‘you are and wrong and here is my deadline’ ultimatum. Image
If I don’t answer their low wattage take on genome integration the by tomorrow they are going to PRINT!
Oh my.

They think retroviruses are the only viruses that can integrate:)

That’s cute.

pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pn… Image
Who are their reviewers?
Kristian Andersen!

I’m sure we’ll get a real balanced answer from the Fauci Fan club. Image
Read 10 tweets
Jun 19
I've seen someone authoritatively claim ONLY the SV40 polyA signal is present in the vaccine.

This person never looked at the sequence.
Here is the region with the SV40 promoter, The 72bp bidirectional SV40 Enhancer, and the SV40 Ori.

nature.com/articles/s4141… Image
SV40 origin is only active in people who have SV40 T-Antigen expressed. Many people (100M) are SV40 infected suggesting they may be present in these individuals

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…
There is an SV40 poly A signal downstream of the F1 origin but this is omits many of the other SV40 components in expression plasmid. Image
Read 8 tweets
Jun 19
I don’t think she understands logic or distributed systems.

Hyper-specialization is never an excuse for holy narratives that can’t be questioned by the plebs.

If the science is sound , different disciplines can see it.

Anon peer review is an attack surface for science
Many important C19 papers went through peer review.
Surgisphere, proximal origins, Jiang et al.

The journals are conflicted with Pharma revenue.

This is an appeal to that church and is ultimately an appeal to authority fallacy.

Either 2+2=4 and others can reproduce it or not
Advocating for NO public debate, when your field of epidemiology went off the rails and locked down the world isn’t gonna fly.
Read 4 tweets
Jun 18
While @PeterHotez squirms over a @joerogan debate, he is waving around his charity.

Is it pure charity?

The claim is that they made a patent-free vaccine...

which requires licenses and clinical trial data that is thin or hard to come by.

sec.gov/Archives/edgar… Image
Patents are not the only way to secure business interests. Trademarks, trade secrets and licensing deals can be just as potent.
Corbevax TM has a trademark and many licensing deals are in place to deliver this cheap vaccine. It is cheap and 'likely' a safer approach than mRNA
Read 18 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(