If your answer is "due to lack of buyers or sellers", it is time to read this thread.
Some nuances and complexities to this but we'll keep it simple for this one. Promise.
Auction Market Theory (AMT)- A Primer (THREAD)
AMT explains how buyers and sellers interact in markets.
Price is driven by market orders (takers) overwhelming limit orders (makers).
Imagine the limit orders as "walls" (passive) that are attacked by market orders that are cannon balls being hurled at the walls (aggressive)
The auction exists for the purpose of facilitating trades + seek "fair value" of the asset.
Fair Value is the price area where the most amount of trades are facilitated. This is determined by amount of time spent at price + associated volume.
The fair value is the area in the distribution where ~70% of the trades have taken place (within 1 standard deviation).
The point of control (PoC) is determined by the price where the most amount of time is spent (can also be looked at through volume).
Typically, the time-based PoC and the volume PoC will line up. One aspect to consider here is virgin or naked PoCs. Naked PoCs that have not been tested by price are levels to consider (magnet) - the older these are the more relevant they become especially when price is trending.
Speaking of trending, AMT characterizes the markets as cycling b/w two modes:
In a balanced market, buyers and sellers can be seen conducting a majority of their business in a range (i.e. chop).
The price will rotate b/w the high and low of the value area. Also referred to as Value Area High (VAH) and Value Area Low (VAL).
In a trending market, one-sided "aggressive" participants decide that they have had enough of the established range and will push the price outside of balance. Once price is moved out of balance (price discovery), the auction will usually seek balance at a previously value area.
There are three elements of AMT:
1. Price - seen as an advertising mechanism. Price invokes emotion and is noisy on it's own.
2. Time - provides insight into areas of interest
3. Volume- shows behavior of market participants
Understanding AMT provides you with the opportunity to deploy a strategy that is in line with the flow of the market i.e. identifying mean reversion opportunities when the market is in balance and positioning for expansions when the market is posed to shift to imbalance.
Having a handle on market dynamics via AMT is one of the pieces of puzzle to be able to "map" the market and gauge sentiment.
Market Profile and Volume Profile are the other pieces. When used in conjunction, this trio is powerful to position you for quality trades.
The AMT axiom is "it is impossible to forecast the future movement of market prices, but it’s quite possible to make a logical assumption on the basis of behavior of the market players."
It is a useful framework that you can consider, study and test as part of your system.
@TraderMagus @BitcoinTrad3r @abetrade Will be diving into market profile, volume profile next or perhaps start delving into breaking down options in a simple-to-understand manner (see a gap in knowledge in this area).
Let me know in the comments if you'd like to suggest any subjects. Open to feedback.
@TraderMagus @BitcoinTrad3r @abetrade For anyone interested, I am running workshops in partnership w/ @VestExchange
Next one will be on: Trading Long-Tail Assets (crypto).
Summary of the one that was done on Funding Rates: buff.ly/3COqEVw
@TraderMagus @BitcoinTrad3r @abetrade @VestExchange In conclusion, developing a system is individually dependent and requires relentless iteration + "skin in the game"
Understanding market dynamics and order-flow is something to consider to improve the odds in your favor.
If this was helpful, hit RT to share with fellow tradors
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
> monthly profile - Jan point of control - ~105 unable to reclaim + multiple rejections so far.
> imbalance (untested conviction) between ~97-100.
> to keep it simple, 105 has remained a key area to flip to rotate towards ATH. However, repeated sell pressure + spot asks stacking every time price approaches this area indicating this has remained a premium for participants thus far. i.e. significant aggression required for turnover.
> note previous balance established here with value between 101 and 93. if acceptance back inside this expecting some reflexivity to the downside (this posture is aided by the aggressive positioning on the way up which lends well to unraveling).
TPO
> 10 day composite bracketing value b/w ~104 and 102.6 with breakout vwap providing reactions thus far.
> price currently trading into low side of composite value and discretionary vwap once again.
> on ltf (1 min), looks like perps are attempting to get aggressive while there is continued spot selling pressure currently.
> look for this general area for continued weakness or ltf bounce (need spot follow through for another attempt at rotating higher).
$BTC Spot
> 2.5% spot depth tells the story of 105+ remaining expensive (ask side skew moving to 100+ Ms in stacking when price approaches this area).
> currently slightly skewed towards the bid side - ~70Ms.
TLDR:
> 105 - key pivot for continuation to ATH - continued sell pressure above thus far.
> low to mid 102s aligned with balance value + breakout vwap (trading here currently).
> imbalance under here = potential reflexivity to the down-side with aggressive positioning established on the way up.
> 100 is a major milestone for $BTC so spending a lot of time under this area = sign to remain cautious and be flexible with posture.
tldr - im tired boss. price rugging with haste as I'm typing out the update and having to modify lol
“History doesn't repeat itself, but it often rhymes.”
The Boom-Bust Sequence & The Comparison of Narrative Momentum & Price (in particular, Narrative Cycle Tops).
a thread 🧵
While reading through George Soros's "Alchemy of Finance" and Brent Donnelly's "Alpha Trader" (in particular, the narrative section), I was struck by several AHA moments.
I would like to try to recreate the same for you. At a minimum, by the end of this thread you should have some understanding of the following terms:
It stems from social theory and George Soros brought it into the world of finance.
An analogy: Pavlov's Experiment & Conditioning To make a long story short, Pavlov set up an experiment where he rang a bell before giving food to his dogs.
Initially, the dogs didn't give much of a shit when the bell was rung. With time, the ringing of the bell elicited a response in the dogs and they would salivate at the ringing of the bell (in anticipation of the food).
We'll come back to how this concept fits into The Boom-Bust Sequence.