.@australian published a piece calling for facts in commentary of the Voice to parliament, but the article itself stated a gross falsehood: '...claim that Indigenous people were not counted in the census until 1967 is simply not true'. Blainey's assertion is wrong, evidence shows
Anyone who knows census - history, data, politics - will tell you just how wrong Blainey's claims are that First Nations Australians were included in population censuses before 1971, and that data for Indigenous peoples was 'precise'.
Blainey, with great hypocrisy, suggests Australians are being lied to by the nation's prime minister and minister for Indigenous Australians. To suggest censuses included First Australians prior to the 1971 national enumeration (first post 1967 referendum) defies all evidence.
Australia has no 'precise' population statistics for First Nations Australians prior to 1971. Additionally, births of Indigenous persons weren't even included in national data until 1966. @LindaBurneyMP's claims of being missing in national data is correct, on numerous fronts.
Imagine having your humanity overlooked so much so that not even your birth is added to national figures? Can't? That's privilege. When it comes to data: what we count matters, because what matters is counted. Census (& other data) has deliberately excluded Indigenous peoples.
Little is known about First Nations populations in Australia prior to or post colonisation before 1971. What is known is through the use of estimation research, such as backcasting. Such research convincingly shows the adverse consequences of colonisation. https://t.co/tdiE7TGa7oresearchgate.net/publication/27…
Early population counts were through musters, from 1795-1825. These musters comprised communities coming together (at a specific time and place) to be counted. Prior to this, population counts were conducted from around 1788. Indigenous people excluded. .abs.gov.au/census/about-c…
The first colonial census was held in 1828 in NSW, and other jurisdictions followed. In 1881, censuses were simultaneous held across the nation. It wasn't until 1911, that the first national census was held. First Nations peoples were excluded. .abs.gov.au/census/about-c…
Early Indigenous-specific population counts were what we now refer to as administrative by-products, collected in the course of providing a service. Blanket lists began in 1814, and were constructed via the provision of a blanket by magistrates and police. www2.sl.nsw.gov.au/archive/discov…
'Governor Macquarie initiated...distribution of blankets to Aboriginal people. He hoped the adoption of blankets would encourage civilised habits & cooperation with the settlers...blankets were usually distributed by magistrates or police annually on...the Queen's Birthday.'
Population counts of Aboriginal people was initially about understanding and accounting for expenditure. This was not census and instead a parallel system of control. www2.sl.nsw.gov.au/archive/discov…
From the @ABSStats: from the first national census in 1911 to 1970, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples were excluded from the national statistics.
Attorney general defined 'aboriginal native' based on blood quantum of 50%+. This was used to exclude Aboriginal people from census data. In theory Aboriginal people could be enumerated, but not included in data. Many Indigenous people, esp in remote areas weren't included.
Not until after the 1967 referendum did the @ABSStats realise the census wasn't actually counting Aboriginal people. https://t.co/c2sXEIAcMVausstats.abs.gov.au/ausstats/subsc…
'Prior to the 1967 referendum, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people were not counted towards Australia’s population, with estimates of Aboriginal people made by authorities responsible for native welfare.' . https://t.co/H7mVUujpR2abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs%4…
First Nations peoples have experienced a long history of discrimination in life and in data. The 1967 referendum helped redress data discrimination. https://t.co/s1mlmJGvvgabs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.…
@mansillo @australian Suggesting Aboriginal people were included in census since 1911 is wrong
Only after the 1967 referendum were First Nations people asked their Indigenous status to be INCLUDED rather than EXCLUDED from official population information . https://t.co/WP1R5XVEUwabs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.…
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people weren’t recognised as part of the Australian population, prior to 1967 and the subsequent 1971 census. aiatsis.gov.au/explore/1967-r…
‘counting of 'full-bloods' was not a prime purpose of the Census, remote areas of Australia which were completely uninhabited by non-Aboriginal people were not enumerated...Thus, the quality of early Aboriginal counts is questionable.’ https://t.co/rwmKKuJlBcausstats.abs.gov.au/ausstats/free.…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Really disappointing to hear LNP politician bring back the very outdated and offensive notion of blood purity in relation to who would be ‘eligible for the voice to parliament’.
Terrifying that the opposition is talking about blood purity qualification standards of First Nations status and eligibility for the voice to parliament.
‘Since first contact with the colonisers of this country, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples have been the object of a continual flow of commentary and classification.’ humanrights.gov.au/about/news/spe…
I got sick over the weekend and had to go to hospital. It was lonely and sad. But it made me reflect on all the important things in my life. The little things day to day that I took for granted. We don’t have money so the kids and I have structured our lives and wellbeing…
…around simple (free) and accessible things (for people with disability). Our lives have come undone over the last few weeks, thanks to covid. Disability support gone. I miss the independence we had, the freedom to do what we needed to do to get by and be content. It’s…
…got me wondering what the future holds for Australia; for us, for people with special needs, for people from diverse backgrounds, for the poor, for people with substance use issues. I yearn for a reset, for our society to come out of this better, fairer.
Lots of talk about the demographic and travel behaviour differences to account for ‘why Victoria’ concerning COVID. Let’s unpack this…with data. #auspol
Experts and politicians have responded to the question on many people’s minds: why Victoria? Why does Vic appear to be struggling with COVID outbreaks, while NSW isn’t? Recent commentary has suggested transport, age, jobs, migrant population etc as among the reasons.
When considering virus outbreaks, population characteristics and behaviours are crucial. The data doesn’t support the suggestions that population and behaviour differ - Vic and NSW aren’t all that different. In fact, the data point to NSW being at greater ‘risk’.