TheLastRefuge Profile picture
Jul 4 12 tweets 2 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
1. @LauraLoomer and @Peoples_Pundit are giving the granular details. All righteous and accurate.

Allow me to elevate your view to the big picture with a short thread.
2. The constitution of the United States outlines that each state in the republic is responsible for conducting their own elections.

For the BIG CLUB, this constitutional position presented a problem.
3. In order to control the levers of power, a system was needed to stand atop the election system outlined in the constitution.

The solution, two political parties. Two private corporations, that could control the process.
4. Two private corporations, the RNC and DNC, were then created. The billionaire (Big Club) operators would then control the corporations through $$.
5. The RNC and DNC then set rules, regulations and bylaws for the state chapters underneath the parent corporation.

In essence, state election rules, party rules, now must align with the rules and regs, of the national private corporation.
6. With the party system in place, the constitutional process, the problem they needed to address, was now subverted.

State elections would now have to follow the rules of two private corporations controlled by the billionaire elites.
7. Now the RNC, a private corporation funded by the billionaires who control it, decide rules, dates and electoral delegate proportions and distribution based on arbitrary calendar dates they themselves create within their national committee processes.
8. The state chapters of the corporation, then must align with the national chapter RNC rules and regulations.

In essence, the state voting processes now must align with the roadmap of the billionaires in the private club who design the process.
9. *The billionaires do not want Donald Trump.

*The billionaires control the RNC rules.

*The billionaires make the rules to design a plan.

*The RNC national rules are adopted.
10. *The states determine their election dates in accordance with the alignment of the national club.

*The distribution of delegates is contingent upon the dates and rules previously established.
11. *The people who control the state clubs, then carry plausible deniability to try and obfuscate their adherence to the private corporation design.

They pretend that everything is being forced upon them by some arbitrary force. However, upstream it is all controlled.
12. The Big Club controls the process, which is designed to deliver a very specific outcome.

Can you see it now?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with TheLastRefuge

TheLastRefuge Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @TheLastRefuge2

Jun 14
1) "defense information" = any ancillary information that applies to "national security" as *DEFINED* by the DOJ!

That last part is the key. Defined by the DOJ.

See next Tweet to see how that worked in this instance. https://t.co/KPElq0n7gf






2) The 11th Circuit CCA, deferred any definition challenges to the DOJ-NSD, and granted them the ability to never disclose the documents or have them reviewed by 'special master' to challenge definition(s).

The entire Smith case boils down to 'definitions'.



3) "definitions" are also what the DOJ weaponized in the targeting of @GenFlynn, with ridiculous claims surrounding what *words* would imply the removal of Russian "sanctions."

See "frame them" below👇

Thus, this Trump case will be argued around meanings. And....
Read 4 tweets
Jun 10
1. Ancillary but telling... notice how the DOJ states 102 classified documents [pg 27]. Some were never marked classified, as noted in the indictment [count 11, page 30], but defined as classified after DOJ review.

Discovered after Trump affirmation of compliance in July 2022.
3. This is the originating predicate for the FBI raid. 

Again, according to page 27, a total of 102 documents were located and then immediately or later identified or defined as "classified" by the FBI/DOJ.
Read 7 tweets
Jun 9
1. The case against President Donald Trump might look bad on paper, because that is what the case against Donald Trump was designed to do.

Lawfare, by design, is for media and political consumption.
2. However, ultimately this case is on a trajectory to go up to a much higher court in discovery and pre-trial argument, because eventually these definitions are going to become an issue for the prosecution.
3. THE TELL – Here’s the “tell” that every pundit, analyst and litigation expert will pretend they don’t notice.  It’s the funniest part of the entire thing and yet no one, again except us, is noticing it....
Read 16 tweets
Jun 7
1. Musk may be seeding the background for a potential outcome of Community Notes attached to Tucker Carlson content; however, Musk has a vested interest in keeping those notes at bay.
2. Carlson does not benefit financially from the use of Twitter, but Musk benefits from the oxygen Carlson's exclusive content provides.

Oddly, there's a background dynamic that also overlays.
3. As long as Rupert Murdoch continues to hold Carlson accountable to the terms and conditions of the non-compete clause within his Fox News contract, and as long as that litigation drags on, Carlson is limited in his options.
Read 11 tweets
Jun 3
1/3 Despite everything known about her corrupt activity, I was unaware Mary McCord's husband, Sheldon L Snook, was the special asst to Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr.’s counselor.

During Spygate through '20 elec.

FUBAR. Things make even more sense

washingtonpost.com/politics/longt… Image
3/3 Mary McCord worked the Spygate and FISC angle (already known), and McCord's husband controlled and influenced any Chief Justice Roberts outreach and/or opinion on the FISC (previously unknown) which is direct Roberts authority.

FUBAR is an understatement! Image
Read 4 tweets
May 26
🚨 @ClimateAudit @pepesgrandma @almostjingo @HansMahncke @themarketswork @LeeSmithDC [+ Lots of 'etc accounts' I don't know usernames anymore, so please forward.]

Suggestion for the Spygate corner of Twitter.

🙏/thread 👇 Image
2) Both the HPSCI and the HJC have briefings and hearings scheduled for June 20th and 21st to ask John Durham questions.

Congress is clueless. Y'all know that. You guys will forget more about Spygate than they will ever know. So, please hear me out.
3) Wherever your corner of Twitter (or whatever) is assembled now, I would suggest you guys put together the questions for House republicans to ask Durham.

If you're not still in a group, maybe reassemble for one last shot that could make a difference.

Let bygones be bygones.
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(