Yet again: the liberal media and political establishment are now drooling, devoted loyalists of the US Security State.
They cheer spying domestic programs they once indignantly denounced, and suggest only traitors and fascists want to limit FBI/NSA spying authorities.🤷♂️
That said, there are also some Dems - including Sens. @ossoff and @DickDurbin -- who are demanding reforms and limits to these spying powers before the law is renewed.
But long-standing left-liberal causes - free speech, civil liberties, etc. - now coded as "hard-right" views.
@ossoff @DickDurbin These labels have become empty parodies. They meaning increasingly little: just weapons.
RFK Jr. has a panoply of long-time left-liberal views. Here he is denouncing censorship by the US Security State. Yet the Atlantic christens him a "MAGA Democrat."
What's more -- to use the words of the NYT -- "hard right" here: demanding that the FBI/NSA's domestic spying powers be renewed yet again with no reforms or limits (as the Biden WH is doing), or saying this?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
That massive war spending harmed Americans' quality of life was once so clear it needed no debate.
Now, this neoliberal rag just accused RFK Jr, myself and others of being - all together now - "Kremlin propagandists" for arguing it. We'll discuss this.
The NYT - which has steadfastly supported Biden's proxy war in Ukraine and the $100 billion for it - just warned Americans the country is drowning in debt and they need to prepare for cuts to Social Security and Medicaid. No mention of war spending:
This NYT article is so remarkable: it now praises as Vital to Our Safety the NSA's domestic warantless spying program that the NYT itself exposed in 2005, but also:
Admits the "new generation" of the GOP opposes US Security State powers, while new Dems revere the CIA/NSA/FBI:
This is the radical change in US politics that most establishment liberals and corporate media figures can't see.
It's what explains why Dems are in bed with neocons; why they revere the US Security State; and why they defend an online censorship regime run by DHS, CIA and FBI.
In fact, Democrats overwhelmingly favor corporate censorship of the internet as well as government censorship of the internet, all in the name of combating "disinformation."
Imagine trusting tech billionaires and the FBI/CIA to decree truth and falsity.
Hello, @SenMarkey: when it comes to Big Tech censorship of the internet, is it the view of the Democratic Party that they are censoring too much political speech, or that they are censoring too little?
In the pantheon of neocon monsters and sociopaths, Elliott Abrams resides in the top tier: supporting death squads, criminally concealing evidence, cheerleading every war from a safe distance.
It's also completely unsurprising that Biden chose him for this position:
The reason the DC bipartisan foreign policy class has trained liberal imbeciles like this one to focus obsessively on the bad acts of faraway foreign governments is to prevent them from focusing on the monsters and criminals empowered by Biden:
Jeffrey Goldberg has more blood on his hands than anyone in media except Bill Kristol. He helped lie the US into every war.
That the person who convinced Americans Saddam was involved in 9/11 rose to the top of establishment media indicts it more than anything I could ever say.
Forget that the Atlantic is owned by one the largest donors to Hillary and DNC: Steve Jobs' billionaire widow.
Goldberg quickly recruited every other neocon, warmongering liar to the Atlantic: David Frum, Anne Applebaum, etc. And he hired CIA conspiracy Queen Natasha Bertrand.