Varangian Chronicler Profile picture
Jul 5 25 tweets 9 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
The Byzantine Empire experienced both eddying heights & devastating catastrophes in the 11th century, what is the reason for this?

The inability to solve the security predicament of their geopolitical situation.

Was this rise & fall inevitable or could it have been prevented?
With the fading of Arab raids in the 10th century, the Byzantines conquered the Muslim Emirates near their borders. This was a strategic imperative to make the core of the empire safe & now possible with the breakdown of the Caliphate.
Early attempts were slow & produced mixed results until Nikephoros Phokas ramped up the professionalization of the military, making it more suited for offensive action. Results were immediate & Nikephoros swept aside all the remaining Emirates that had preyed on the Byzantines.
This offensive army grew in size & importance with the campaigns of John Tzimiskes & Basil II in wars of conquest, particularly in Armenia, Syria, & Bulgaria. These armies were eminently capable & doubled the size of the Empire, bringing the Byzantine Empire to its medieval peak.
However, constant campaigning meant these soldiers needed to be full-time troops & without enemy incursions to necessitate militiamen, the themes decayed. Military obligations were transformed into taxes to maintain the professional army.
An earlier thread expounds on this transformation & its military/political consequences, go give it a read. Basically; militias are good at defense & professionals are better at offense, you don’t want one when you need the other.
Also, this professionalization was accompanied by centralization. Basil II, after facing two military revolts lead by the military elite of Cappadocia decided to break them. No longer would these military families be able to challenge the imperial government.
Basil promoted new men & families to military posts, ensuring their loyalty by preventing those with regional power bases from taking charge of the military as well.
The themesmen who once were paid through their governor & followed him into battle now paid tax to Constantinople or were paid professionals in the direct employ of Basil’s army. Local power was diffused & a threat to central power neutralized.
After Basil, the decadent imperial government drained the treasury & slowly degraded the professional army as a cost-saving measure. When strong foreign armies arrived at the borders they burst through the brittle remains of the professionals & found a docile populace.
There is much finger-pointing on the blame for this catastrophe, but was this the inevitable result of the professionalization needed to secure the borders in the 10th century?

All states fall, perhaps Byzantine decisions were mostly sound & hindsight is clouding our assessment.
Basil’s breaking of the Cappadocian Clique allowed the Constantinoplitan elite to rule without serious provincial revolts for decades. However, this robbed C. Anatolia of warlike men grounded in local communities that could repel invasions like they had for centuries.
Had Basil not suppressed them they may have remained a pool of military talent that could take the reigns of government during times of trouble & throw invaders back from Anatolia’s interior. However, they may have also caused frequent civil wars & loosened Constantinople’s grip.
It is also not a guarantee these men would have remained warlike. As raids subsided there would’ve been little combat for the men of Cappadocia. These men could have simply become a decadent elite, lording over serfs from their palaces, no better able to resist invasion.
In reality the landed elite created both the disastrous Doukids & the brilliant Komnenoi. It appears that the Byzantines were able to produce great men equal to the challenges of their day, but not always able to arrest decadence & corruption before disaster.
So what could have prevented collapse? Systematically, stronger ducates on the borders with intact militias & professional detachments. This would maintain a militarized elite & population in the borderlands, better able to fend off attacks.
This could be coupled with an annual campaign season for which men across the empire are conscripted, maintaining a healthy mix of professional & militiamen in the army & investing the citizens in the political & military success of the Empire.
However, this raises issues. The military elite of the ducates could still become an issue for the central government & ruling over foreign peoples might have established their own kingdoms or shattered centralized control.
Transforming the Empire into a monstrosity resembling the later HRE was unlikely to solve problems & rather encourage dissolution. However, the unique power of Constantinople relative to the provinces had always encouraged centralization, only when lost did Byzantium fracture.
It’s impossible to know for sure, but the lifecycle of Empire means that victory bears the seeds of defeat. It is clear however that state collapse need not mean the collapse of a nation.
The frivolity of imperial governance & demilitarization of Anatolians encouraged this latter phenomenon. Had local institutions remained stronger & more popular, Byzantine attempts to roll back Turkish invasions like those of the Arabs may have proved fruitful.
Had this occurred Anatolia may not have been transformed into the cradle of the modern Turkish nation. When Heraclius settled the armies into the provinces, establishing what would become the Theme System, he localized defense & saved Anatolia from the fate of Egypt & the Levant.
Had, say, Isaac Komnenos relocalized defense the Byzantines would have likely lost some peripheral conquests due to diminished offensive capacities & retreated to the natural barriers of the Haemus & Taurus Mountains. (Not unlike earlier abandonments of Dacia & Mesopotamia)
It’s possible Romanos could have snatched victory from the jaws of defeat by doing the same in the wake of Manzikert & empowered governors in Antioch, Cilicia, & Trebizond who rose up to take charge of local defense with mixed success. However, the Doukids had other plans.
Civil war shattered this possibility & the Komnenoi found many in the Anatolian interior unenthusiastic about a return to Byzantine rule, as well as personally cautious for fear of creating rivals through expansion.

What do you think?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Varangian Chronicler

Varangian Chronicler Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Varangian_Tagma

Jun 30
Some criticize the Byzantine Empire for failing to “Romanize” the lands it conquered from 934-1045 AD. However, there simply weren’t enough “Romans.” Arab depredations during the preceding 300 years had depopulated much of Anatolia.
People first came down from their troglodyte villages & resettled the productive plains. Some paleoenvironmental evidence is now emerging regarding this process in Cappadocia specifically. journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.117…
Armenians, their mountainous homelands unable to support them, moved thickly into Melitene & Cilicia. After Manzikert an Armenian Kingdom survived in the latter, a testimony to their numbers there.
Read 14 tweets
Jun 29
A poignant excerpt from Toynbee; the haughty exploits of the conqueror often weaken his power & his bloody acts are repaid in kind by other peoples.

Toynbee mentions that many of those under the Assyrian yoke survived better than their erstwhile masters. Shelley’s Ozymandias really captures the desolate remains of this vanished empire.
…reached the stiff & menacing figure & sent it clattering & crashing down the moraine of ruined brickwork into the fosse below, they did not suspect that their terrible adversary was no longer a living man at the moment when they struck their daring, & apparently decisive, blow.
Read 4 tweets
Jun 28
A generation after the disaster at Pliska, war again loomed over the Haemus Mountains.

During these preparations a secret embassy arrived in the capital, imploring Emperor Theophilos for his help.

The Emperor accepted & initiated one of the greatest rescue missions in history.
After crushing the Byzantines at Pliska, killing Emperor Nikephoros I, & famously turning his skull into a chalice, Khan Krum extended his Empire south into Byzantine territory. Integrating these Byzantines into the Bulgarian state was a key priority for the Khan.
Many of these populations & their leaders were allowed to maintain their posts & homes in the borderlands; however, Krum’s successors became uneasy with this arrangement. They felt these populations might serve as a fifth column for any Byzantine counterattacks.
Read 12 tweets
Jun 16
Roman adoption of a slave plantation economic model can be traced back to the Punic Wars & the acquisition of Sicily & its fertile land.

This would prove seriously damaging to Rome’s Republican institutions & perhaps surprisingly, was an artifact of the Carthaginian Empire. Image
An earlier thread talked about how the Punic Wars kicked off a vicious cycle of slave labor, military professionalization, and the impoverishment of citizens but the economic model that made this possible could have also been a poisoned chalice from Carthage herself.
Carthage was known across the ancient world for the scale of production in its agricultural hinterland. When Rome burned Carthage the only text they took was an agricultural treatise by Mago, a Carthaginian, displaying the respect they had for Punic agriculture. Image
Read 9 tweets
Jun 13
The Byzantine Empire before Manzikert was a superpower; but, this single battlefield defeat & infighting led to collapse.

Byzantium had been through worse & was known for stubborn resistance.

What changed & how is this a warning to governments tempted to take a similar path? Image
Byzantine cultural & economic output during this period is huge; however, dynastic difficulties & corrupt imperial courts drained the treasury & enacted unsound policies. We’ll focus on the downstream effects of this which made the famously resilient Byzantine military so brittle Image
In the 1060s it’s clear, even with a lack of sources, that Doukid mismanagement had cost Byzantium much strength. But what about earlier? Historians seem split, especially regarding Constantine Monomachos. Image
Read 26 tweets
Jun 6
The Crusader States, despite massive aid from their homelands in the West, were doomed to fall for two major reasons.

Let’s examine them & how this geopolitical situation is echoed in Levantine states’ current strategic predicament. Image
In a campaign that defies belief, the Crusaders conquered the entire Levantine Coast including the Holy City of Jerusalem. These lands were shielded from the interior by mountains, rivers, and the Dead Sea. Sea lanes to Constantinople & Italy connected them with wider Christendom Image
Although some terrain separated the Crusaders from inland it didn’t generally impede attacks. Crusader attacks on Muslim cities like Aleppo & Damascus ended in failure. Crusader forces were fragmented, too far from their power centers, & reliant on reinforcements from the West. Image
Read 26 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(