AusPolMate - Politics and stuff Profile picture
Jul 8, 2023 • 18 tweets • 7 min read • Read on X
1/ 🧵Vile Robodebt lies that live on.
If you’ve been told Labor started/pioneered/”laid the foundations” or in any way was involved with Robodebt you have been told a vile lie.
If you are posting this information, then you are lying.
This thread busts these absurd lies.
2/
NO, Data Matching was NOT started by Shorten/Plibersek & Data Matching is NOT Robodebt .
Data Matching has been undertaken for over 50 years.

The 1975/76 DSS Annual Report👇includes details of data matching for fraud detection.
3/
There is some evidence that parliament was using data matching in 1968. During a debate on conscription, this astute politician warned that the use of machines may apply harsh & substantial laws to an individual and destroy their rights.
4/
Some people are aware of the 1990 Data Matching Act (left👇). This was created solely for the newly created Tax File Number. Additionally, the role of Privacy Commissioner” was created. For Non-TFN data matching only gazetting of program was required (right👇).
5/
The first complaint arising from a data matching error was in 1979 (earlier may exist). A matching surnames error resulted in loss of pension. In 1983 the Law Reform Commissioner wrote about this and other potential risks with mass computerisation.
6/
In 1993 The Privacy Commissioner tasked the parliamentary library with finding existing data matching programs. The list of 20 programs below were what they were able to find.
7/
The Howard government initiated many Non TFN data matching pograms. As they weren’t using the TFN they were publicly gazetted. As the gazettes below show, these programs were and still are commonplace. Notice these programs also included garnishee for recovering debts.
8/
Data Matching was used to detect fraud across all areas of social security & taxation law. The program to look at fraud in "Adult Services" in 2005 is an example of how wide fraud detection was/is pursued.
9/
The Howard government ratcheted up the fraud investigations in 1998 by requiring Centrelink to raise 4,000 prosecutions p/year. This KPI was part of many changes aimed at making Centrelink self-funded. Howard began making Centrelink self funded & removed them from the budget

10/
The year 2000 saw the introduction of a new identifier as part of the PAYG tax reforms. This was used in a new data matching program which was piloted in 2001/02 & fully rolled out in 2004. The budget papers below the budget impacts of this automated data matching.
11/
Labor restructured Centrelink to become funded through normal appropriations and removed the 4,000 target.

The vile nature of the Robodebt lies is made clear with these interviews with Centrelink Fraud investigation team leaders.
12/
These team leaders admitted that they chased easy prosecutions and ignored large and complex fraud as it would take too long.
13/
The new approach of proactively contacting people and focusing on large complex fraud is described in Centrelinks annual reports. Here is two excerpts.

14/
These staff worked very hard and consequently the number of prosecutions dropped by near 3,00 p/year.
While the prosecutions dropped, the money recovered continued going up as the complex fraud teams skills grew.
These staff should be thanked, not slandered.
15/
Defrauding the commonwealth has always been a serious crime. The first social security laws i 1908 came with a penalty of up t 5 yrs imprisonment for fraudulent claiming.
It also codified sexism and racism.
16/
Another nonsense claim is Labor/Bill Shorten only jumped on the bandwagon later.
Labors shadow minister for social services was Linda Burney and she was on it from the very beginning. See TV segment and tweets.
https://t.co/BSw3JudokV
17/
I have tried tracking back to see where the lie zero was. The first deflection to Labor I could find was Rick Mortons article in Jan 2017. The RC showed Rick was told it was not the same system. (Email evidence👇)
Beware: There are lots of tweets all saying the same lies.

18/
If the posts haven't got enough info to source the original let me know.
If you find other lies that I have not covered let me know.
Remember, its absurd to think the govt began data matching in 2011. This alone should be enough proof.
#Auspol #RobodebtRC

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with AusPolMate - Politics and stuff

AusPolMate - Politics and stuff Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AusPolMate

May 16, 2024
1/ Coalition 70 seat minority government
My thoughts on how Dutton has pitched & wedged his budget to take a 70 seat minority govt.
Salient points;
1. Screw renewables, he has no intention of getting greens voters.
2. Re-use existing power plant locations will upset no one.
2/
3. Migrants & Foreign investors don't vote, so no downside.
This is the same as Greens strategy of protesting against things in places they'll never win.
An example is Greens Anti-Adani risks nothing as they'll never take Capricornia or mining towns.
#Auspol
3/
4. Emissions on RV's are perfect for Nationals electorates and reinforce the Greens/Labor coalition narrative News Corp/Liberal/National will keep driving home.
#Auspol
Read 6 tweets
Feb 29, 2024
1/ BREAKING LATEST EMISSIONS⬇️459Mt (YR 2 Dec)
Compared to Paris agreement:
➡️Started in 2005 @ 621Mt
➡️Target 354Mt vs Now 459Mt
➡️Target 43%⬇️2005 vs Now = 25.4%
#Auspol #Renewables
The Australian Labor party are the only party in Australia that has a fully modelled plan for how Australia will reach the Paris Agreement target. The Greens have no modelling and the Liberals don't believe in climate change.
Image
2/
Emission from electricity⬇️4.9%; (7.7 Mt CO2-e)
-Driver is more Renewables
Agriculture⬆️2.5%; (2.0 Mt CO2-e)
-Driver is bumper crops
Transport⬆️4.5%; (4.2 Mt CO2-e)
-Driver is post COVID recovery
Share of Emissions👇 Image
3/
Change in electricity generation in the NEM, trend, by fuel.
COAL & GAS are going⬇️down
Benefits from land use changes are tapering out
Image
Image
Read 5 tweets
Feb 15, 2024
1/ UNRWA's & Tunnels- From UNRWA website.
2017 - Tunnel under two UNRWA schools.
2014 - UNRWA discover rockets in school (2nd time)
2021 - What is a "possible tunnel"?
2012 - So many tunnels they describe it as a "Tunnel Area" in Rafah.


Image
Image
Image
Image
2/ 2021 - "underground structures" & "tunnels."
2017 - Tunnel under an UNRWA school
2023 - Rafah Camp blockade - "1,500 tunnels", "tunnel economy."
2011 - September goods smuggled through tunnels - 90,000 tonnes of aggregate, 15,000 tonnes of steel bars


Image
Image
Image
Image
3/ 2022 - 'such structures & installations underneath a school' & "Man made Cavity" under an UNRWA school.
2013 - UNRWA condemns tunnels and rockets fired into Israel.
2018 - Two staff who took senior positions in Hamas were sacked
2017 - 3 men died when tunnel collapsed


Image
Image
Image
Image
Read 10 tweets
Aug 14, 2023
1/ My 10c on Rent Freeze Law -It's easy being Green.
The bill has no cost calculation or estimate.
It's inaccurate to describe the payment as being determined by the Minister. Obviously, the Minister can't determine that $1 is enough, so this section is logically impossible. Image
2/ Property Mgrs/Real-Estate companies will keep the fee while the landlords refund the tenants.
Landlords would need to refund money & redo their tax returns & may need to borrow money to finance the refunds. Image
3/ This will be a disincentive to improving the quality of the rental stock.
Landlords would not want the financial risk of capital improvements that are unable to be recouped.
Body Corporate improvements would become nearly impossible to resolve. Image
Read 9 tweets
Jul 28, 2023
1/ Greens Hypocrisy Busted:
đź“·Right: Greens using a 1 in 2,000 year flood model to protest against 855 new homes in Max's wealthy electorate. 855 homes lower values?
đź“·Left: Greens omits the flood model (I've added it back) from their plan for a new school & some public housing. Max Chandler-Mather lying by omission. The Greens are the ultimate NIMBY party. The Greens use a 1 in 2000 year flood model to discredit the proposed development and then propose an alternative use of the site while not mentioning or showing any flood impacts.
2/This is how the Greens present their plan.

Using just a tiny pocket of land to build some public housing & creating hectares of parkland would increase home values. The Greens @Greens and Max Chandler-Mather posting an alternative plan for the Bulimba Barracks site without using the flood map he used to discredit the existing development proposal.
3/
Here are Max's Facebook posts protesting against development on the old army land.
He doesn't mention the flood model is for a 1 in 2,000-year flood on the old undrained army land. Lies by omission by Max Chandler-Mather and the Greens. Using the 1 in 2000 year flood model but making the reader believe it shows an actual flood.
Read 8 tweets
Jun 25, 2023
1/ 🧵Greens Housing Policy
A fund by any other name would smell of hypocrisy.
Trust/Fund:
Greens will create a Housing Trust. Sounds similar to a Future Fund, but ministers will have direct control.
Same indirect funding:
States, councils, community housing providers etc.
2/
Labor already has a shared equity scheme.
Interestingly the Greens think houses will cost $300K to build or buy. This will likely limit any new housing to the far reaches of cities. Sounds like a recipe for high-pollution transit and a lack of employment
3/
Greens are literally quoting the existing HAFF. NHFIC is what began in 2018 and had a 5-year life. ALP has extended it by 1 year.
This means greens refer to a fund that raises equity by issuing bonds, etc. Funny how they say they hate this
HAFF is bigger & better than NHFIC
Read 20 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(