Matthieu Pageau Profile picture
Jul 9 7 tweets 2 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
When i use the term "rumination" i mean something very specific. "Ruminating" is the opposite of "Reasoning" in the sense that we reason from our first principles, by deduction. So reason is about thinking within the framework of our existing perspective. Deducting from axioms.
Rumination is what you do when you suspect that your first principles are either lacking or unclear to you. It's about reconnecting with reality (concrete facts and experience) and "letting facts express themselves". This is difficult because it takes time; it can't be forced.
So ruminating is about renewal and crowning your current principles. This is the meaning of Moses and the stone. He was supposed to "ask the stone for water" but instead he "hit it with his staff". The latter means that he attempted to force the stone to renew him.
His staff represents something like a "tree" (it's the branch of a tree). The tree expresses itself, as reason does. From a seed, it branches out logically and produces fruit.

But here Moses was supposed to ask the stone for water: this is a stumbling stone or "obstacle stone"
It's what i call in my book "trying to subsume time into space". When looking for renewal, you must "let the stone give you water" and not reason your way to it (force it)

This is basically what rumination is about (and more).

Sometimes use your staff, sometimes ask the stone.
This is one of the reasons materialistic science was separated from spirituality in our history. At one point, science focused entirely on "asking the stone" (experimentation) while religion focused on preserving its staff (at one point it even stopped trying to hit the stone).
When you "listen to the stone" too much you become a materialist and later a complete relativist. When you never listen to the stone you become dogmatic and then dry out. Then, once that happens, you usually end up going too far the other way and get flooded by too much water.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Matthieu Pageau

Matthieu Pageau Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @PageauMatthieu

Jun 27
Wisdom is NOT Solomon's gold. God asked Solomon what he wanted, and he chose wisdom INSTEAD of gold (more accurately, he asked for the discernment between good and bad.)

So God ALSO gave him the appropriate amount of riches (gold) as the counterweight to his wisdom.
In other words, he received the appropriate amount of gold needed (the necessary resources) to fully embody and externalize his high level of wisdom and understanding. So this gold symbolizes what is needed to create a "kingdom" that expresses his level of wisdom.
This includes, not just the kingdom of which he was the King (at that precise time -> Israel) but also the entire world. This is symbolized by the 666 gold coins of his sea trading enterprises (which he created with the help of Hiram). This represents a world empire.
Read 11 tweets
Jun 16
This happened in Shechem. This is the first plot of land bought (after Machpela the burial ground - which is very interesting in it's own right)

The land was bought first in order to ruminate there (about the TKGB) but the union was forced by the "other side" (this can happen)
This is a very important story. Shechem "son of Hamor" means Shechem son of Donkey. In Biblical Cosmology, the donkey often represents "raw matter" or "raw power". It can also be translated as "clay" (raw matter). (notice donkeys don't ruminate or have split hooves).
So "Shechem son of Hamor" is a way to signal that this "place" was very raw in its current state (absurd even). They bought the land in order to ruminate but the union was pre-emptively forced by a rape. The result was the "flaming sword turning on itself".
Read 4 tweets
Jun 15
That's the problem. He should have ruminated before eating the TKGB. All the rest of the Bible is about that: ruminating on the TKGB to fix Adam and Eve's pre-emptive attempts at integration.
It was Abel's Job to ruminate. He was the first one whose mission was to ruminate. That's why he is a herder. After the fall, all there is to eat is "the grass of the field" or thorns and thistles. The sheep represent the ability to ruminate slowly and integrate that "grass".
Cain cut that short before it was time (impatient)

Later it was Jacob's Job (and his 12 sons - for all the lunar months) to ruminate on the TKGB. This is what it means when Joseph goes to find his brothers in Shechem (this is where Mount Ebal and Gerizim are = the raw TKGB
Read 6 tweets
Jun 15
This is basically straight from my book.

The "confused cloud" painting that we see in this picture is not exactly an explicit representation of a "principality". (I already explain this fully in my book, The Language of Creation - chapters 33, 50, 77) Image
It represents the "watery cloud", which is what we see when an unknown principle is covertly ruling over a body. A strange principle is ruling over this country during a process of transformation, but it has not been officially revealed yet.
The dark masks represent the transitory anonymity of a confused body awaiting the revelation of a strange new principle. It also represents the silence and secrecy that the subverted body is bound to until the higher principle names them according to the new foreign order.
Read 7 tweets
Jun 14
I was looking for examples of the "Crazy Conspiracy Programming" spell, and happened to see this video about Canadian forest fires.

i recommend watching it. When examined closely, it's about 10% argument and 90% smugness and silly voices. Brilliant!

https://t.co/iVFQzaOzWx
He discusses 3 theories about the Canadian fires.

#1 The "grand conspiracy theory" (his words) which posits the fires were started on purpose.

#2 The corporate media theory which posits climate change.

#3 His theory which blames lightning and abnormally warm weather.
The video is about smugly mocking theory #1 (without real arguments) while directly promoting theory #3 (and indirectly promoting #2)

I tried to summarize most of the arguments below, but this is no substitute for watching the video. The smugness and silly voice is 90% of it.
Read 16 tweets
Jun 14
>Can you make a post with all the green matrix diagrams you posted so far.

Yes.
Image
Image
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(