Jikkyleaks 🐭 Profile picture
Jul 12, 2023 7 tweets 3 min read Read on X
Please watch and share.

Assumptions are not science.
Lies are not science.
Cover ups are not science.

[Sound on]
@RepBradWenstrup @CharlesRixey @Daoyu15 @chrismartenson
#3tablets #Modernagate #CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG
#BatBumEddie https://t.co/wCSBT4kkBk
@RepBradWenstrup @CharlesRixey @Daoyu15 @chrismartenson Clean version without quote tweet below, for better formatting
@RepBradWenstrup @CharlesRixey @Daoyu15 @chrismartenson Please watch and share.
Assumptions are not science.
Lies are not science.
Cover ups are not science.
[Sound on]

@RepBradWenstrup @CharlesRixey @Daoyu15 @chrismartenson #3tablets #Modernagate #CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG #BatBumEddie
And no, it isn't a "formatting" mistake.
https://t.co/payRer5Y1yarchive.is/9fzve
Image
"Proximal origins" archived here
archive.is/hyz33
After 3 years there has no been an apology from the field of virology.

There has never been an apology for AIDS, SARS, MERS or versions of Influenza made to sell vaccines.

There has never been a working vaccine created for any of these.

So, what should happen to virology: twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Another day, another virologist making another virus.

SHUT IT DOWN. NOW.

@BrokenTruthTV @Jim_Jordan @RepThomasMassie

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jikkyleaks 🐭

Jikkyleaks 🐭 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Jikkyleaks

Jun 18
This is a false statement by omission.

It should say that cervical cancer deaths fell to zero in young women irrespective of vaccination status.

That is multifactorial due to change in screening and under-age sexual activity in the UK.

No RCT has shown a reduction in cancer
Teenage pregnancies are a surrogate for underage sexual activity (which drives cervical cancer rates in the under 25s). In the UK they fell off a cliff in 2007 - the year the iphone came out and the HPV vaccine rollout started.

At the same time there was a large rise in cervical cancer incidence in the older age group who were given the HPV vaccine in the "catch up" program.

It is a fallacy to say that it only works in underage girls.

Read 6 tweets
May 12
Absolutely not @quay_dr.

The "Swiss patient" sequence you provided not only has 2% dissimilarity from any known hanta sequence but BLASTing into the patent database gets us here.

"No name" virus.
Really?

The people running the @DeptofWar need to start going to jail.

@JesslovesMJK @Kevin_McKernan @open_vaet @Fynnderella1 @AGHuff @RepThomasMassie @BlackTomThePyr8 @FeeRedfern @artisbrutal2021Image
Image
Oof.. Jay Hooper
USAMRIID.



@FeeRedfern @RWMaloneMD @JesslovesMJK @carl_jurassic @open_vaet
@FeeRedfern @RWMaloneMD @JesslovesMJK @carl_jurassic @open_vaet Oh what a pretzel we weave when we try to deceive...

x.com/i/grok/share/d…Image
Read 4 tweets
Feb 23
💥BOOM 💥
This post attracted hundreds of abusive pharma trolls, including an attempt to community note the post.

It was just a reply to another post and got over 1000 likes but 100s of trolls.

Why?

I am going to tell you in the next post. And it will shake your world.
You were lied to about the Merck measles vaccine develop in the 60s. When injected into babies it caused fevers, rashes, diarrhoea and febrile convulsions.

Why?

I'm going to show you.
@SecKennedy @RetsefL @MaryanneDemasi @DrJulieSladden @RWMaloneMD
Merck claimed that the "measles vaccine" was an "attenuated version of measles" giving the impression that it was a virus that was made safe.

That was a lie.

It was just measles, passaged in cells in a lab.

We injected our babies with actual measles.
How do I know?
Read 11 tweets
Feb 10
💥💥💥BOOM💥💥💥

Recently released Australian Road Deaths data confirm that the @epiphare study claiming that COVID vaccination reduced road deaths by 32% was, as suspected, a complete fake.

See next tweet for the analysis and sources.
Paper: jamanetwork.com/journals/jaman… x.com/sudokuvariante…https://www.bitre.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/road-trauma-australia-2024.pdf
Here are the actual road deaths data plotted from the Australian BITRE data repository using a trendline for 2000-2019 (excluding 2020 as it was a quiet year)

The pink area shows the inflection and increase in road deaths over the predicted number.

Note that road deaths have a downward trend despite an increase in population (due to safety measures and slowing of traffic).Image
So the question becomes...
"what is the probability that - if the @epiphare study was real (showing a 32% reduction in road deaths after vaccination) - the Australian road deaths (where nearly 100% of the adult population was vaccinated) would increase by 36%"?
Read 8 tweets
Jan 24
🚨🚨🚨
Do you know why you can't win a vaccine injury case in the US?

This one tweet from @DebbieN97142 opens the Pandora's box that is the Vaccine Injuries Compensation Scheme.

You never stood a chance.
Thread below.

@AaronSiriSG @MaryanneDemasi @RWMaloneMD
Debbie's tweet was about her case against @HHSGov when her son developed Type 1 Diabetes after a routine vaccine, when he had a negative glucose test prior.

So it was clearly vaccine linked, but her case was denied.

How did that happen?

From her post Image
Not only was the case denied (despite clear evidence of a new diagnosis immediately after vaccination) but the case was used by the "judge" to essentially ban ANY further cases that alleged a link between new diabetes and a routine vaccine.

Read it again. Image
Read 25 tweets
Dec 29, 2025
🚨 Important - Francis Boyle never submitted an affidavit to the Dutch court.

The document submitted by Sansone with Boyle's signature is not notarised, is not an affidavit and can only be considered a forgery.

See next tweet

Image
Here is the clip from the (decent) interview with Pelle Neroth Taylor of @RealTNTRadio.

In it Boyle is asked whether the mRNA vaccines are themselves biological weapons and he explains that because "in your system, it generates the COVID-19 cells" they would be.

But of course that's incorrect, because mRNA vaccines don't recreate the COVID virus (the biological weapon - assuming as we now know that it was synthetic not natural).
So his explanation was incorrect because he misunderstood that the mRNA only provides the spike protein and he would have been destroyed on this point in court.

Of course he never got to court. And never gave an affidavit for the Dutch court - confirmed here (8/3/25): Image
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(