Why is Garland Special Counsel Robert Hur in no Hur-ry to investigate Biden?
1. For 2 months, Biden Attorney General Merrick Garland secretly colluded with his boss Biden's private attorneys.
2. They covered up Biden's 5 stashes of stolen classified records from the Obama White House (and even the Senate), unguarded for years, moved several times, accessible by Biden's Chinese agent, and likely illegally used by Hunter to corruptly secure millions of foreign bribes and other corruption in Ukraine, China, Romania, and potentially elsewhere.
3. At the same time, Garland went to a biased magistrate judge (Bruce Reinhart, who had just recused from Trump's civil lawsuit against Hillary Clinton 6 weeks prior after Reinhart bashed Trump on Facebook) and obtained an order green-lighting an unprecedented, unnecessary, and unlawful home raid on a former president.
4. For the non-crime of a former president having his presidential records in the congressionally funded and heavily guarded Office of the Former President, which is allowed by the Presidential Records Act.
5. But the Biden DOJ ignored the Presidential Records Act--and falsely accused their boss Biden's chief political enemy Trump of "espionage."
6. After Garland got caught in his Biden collusion and cover-up, Garland appointed Special Counsel Robert Hur to "investigate" Biden.
7. Hur is the longtime protégé of FBI Director Chris Wray.
8. Wray was born into privilege in New York City, attended the best privates schools, went onto Yale and Yale Law, and then was handed the best legal jobs in and out of government.
9. Wray's always been spineless and eager to please Democrats. For months, for example, Wray let BLM and antifa cause billions in damage, kill dozens, attack the White House, torch St. John's Church, and destroy American cities.
10. Since 2017, Wray sat on serious, credible, and compromising FBI evidence that then-Vice President and 2020 presidential candidate Biden took a $10 million foreign bribe:
11. Wray is the longtime protégé of disgraced former FBI Director James Comey.
12. Bush 43 fired Comey as the Deputy Attorney Attorney (DOJ #2), for whom Wray worked for 5 years.
13. Obama appointed Comey as his FBI director, and Trump fired disgraced Comey and replaced him with Wray. (Chris Christie pushed Wray. Big mistake.)
14. Hur is also the longtime protégé of Rod Rosenstein, Obama's only 8-year Bush 43 U.S. Attorney holdover.
15. Hur was the #2 to Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein (DOJ #2), who (mis-)managed the Mueller probe against President Trump.
16. Garland Special Counsel Jack Smith, a disgraced and partisan former federal prosecutor unanimously reversed by the Supreme Court after serious prosecutorial misconduct against another Republican presidential contender, has spent over $9,000,0000 pursuing Trump for the non-crime of a former president having his presidential records.
17. Hur has only spent just over $600,000 pursuing Biden, for the obvious crime of stealing classified records, leaving them unguarded for years and accessible to a Chinese agent, and likely using them in foreign bribery and other corruption schemes.
Hur is running Garland's obvious coverup for Biden.
The President of the United States correctly designated Tren de Aragua (TdA), a vicious Venezuelan gang, as a foreign-terrorist organization.
The President correctly put these terrorists on planes to get them the hell out of our country.
Yet DC Obama Judge James Boasberg thinks he has the power to order the President to turn around the planes in mid-air and bring back these terrorists into America.
This is the most dangerous constitutional crisis imaginable.
I do not say this lightly:
The President has a constitutional duty, as the chief executive officer and commander-in-chief, to ignore Judge Boasberg's lawless and dangerous order.
The Supreme Court must use the emergency docket to immediately stay Judge Boasberg's order.
An activist Obama DC judge thinks he has the power to order the President to turn around planes deporting vicious Venezuelan Tren de Aragua gang members?
When will the Chief Justice and Justice Barrett end this extremely dangerous judicial sabotage of the presidency?
Tina Peters, the then-Mesa County, Colorado clerk and recorder, investigated voter fraud after the 2021 Grand Junction municipal election.
So hyper-partisan Democrat Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold and Attorney General Phil Weiser, along with a weak Republican local District Attorney Dan Rubenstein, brought trumped-up felony charges against Tina Peters and (falsely) accused her of unauthorized access to voting machines.
During this same time, Jena Griswold--a partisan slob--allowed voting-machine passwords to remain publicly posted online for 4 months.
Then Democrat Judge Matthew Barrett, poorly rated by his community, was dumb enough to state on the record he sentenced 69-year-old Tina Peters to 9 years in prison because of her First Amendment-protected views on election integrity.
Tina Peters is now suffering greatly in prison, because of these sadistic partisans.
Fortunately, the Trump 47 Justice Department's Civil Rights Division, along with Colorado Acting U.S. Attorney Bishop Grewell, took the first step today to bring justice to Tina Peters.
They filed a statement of interest in her federal habeas lawsuit, drafted by attorney Patrick McSweeney, raising these serious civil-rights problems.
Next, the Trump 47 Justice Department must open a federal civil-rights probe, under 18 U.S.C. § 241, for this apparent criminal conspiracy to violate the constitutional rights of Tina Peters.
This includes investigating Jena Griswold, Phil Weiser, Dan Rubenstein, Judge Matthew Barrett, and all other potential co-conspirators.
It is outrageous they've put this 69-year-old woman in prison for 9 years for simply questioning elections.
Nobody is above the law.
ICYMI, my piece on this:
Judge Throws The Book At 69-Year-Old Tina Peters For Minor Infraction Because She Believes The 2020 Election Was Stolen
At @Article3Project, we're drafting legislation to "reform" the DC U.S. District Court--the worst of the worst.
Maybe we get rid of the (unconstitutional) DC Superior Court, make current DC U.S. District Court judges handle DC street crimes, cut their budgets, and randomly draw U.S. judges from across America to sit by designation for all other DC cases?
Seems like the ideal time to get rid of the (unconstitutional) DC Superior Court:
With President Trump's January 6th pardons and commutations, let's take a spin through the clownish statements and actions from the Democrat political operatives in robes on the D.C. District Court.
Congress must hold aggressive oversight hearings on the D.C. District Court.
Amy Berman Jackson (Obama judge)
· “No stroke of a pen and no proclamation can alter the facts of what took place on January 6, 2021.”
· “When others in the public eye are not willing to risk their own power or popularity by calling out lies when they hear them, the record of the proceedings in this courthouse will be available to those who seek the truth.”
· “Patriotism is loyalty to country and loyalty to the constitution – not loyalty to a single head of state.”
· “No ‘process of national reconciliation’ can begin when poor losers, whose preferred candidate loses an election, are glorified for disrupting a constitutionally mandated proceeding in Congress and doing so with impunity.”
· “This court cannot let stand the revisionist myth relayed in this presidential pronouncement.”