One odd detail on Eppsās odd status. When I foiaād his FBI file last year, they acknowledged having the file, but withheld it due to his personal privacy. NOT due to any ongoing investigation. How things change.
Then, after Epps did his NYT interview and his J6 transcript was published, I foiaād his FBI file a 2nd time, noting that any privacy concern was long gone. In response, the FBI simply refused to state whether they had any files (after previously acknowledging having files).
1/ Epstein files. Geeeettt your Epstein files, here. All free, free, free!!! But only for people who want to actually read them. Which excludes Massie and his fellow lying Democrats. vicourts.org/workspaces/Oneā¦
2/ More free Epstein Files!!! Thousands of pages. Transcripts, emails. Massie hasnāt read any of them and doesnāt give a crap about the actual facts. courtlistener.com/docket/6589417ā¦
3/ Freeeeee Epstein files. Come and get āem. Free free free. Massie doesnāt read them, nor his Democrat friends, but YOU can, if you really want to. courtlistener.com/docket/1731837ā¦
Short thread š§µ on Massieās proposed Epstein bill: 1/ If Iām reading this stuff correctly, Massieās discharge petition concerns a proposed amendment substituting 4-5 pages of Epstein-related disclosure requirements for 192 pages of a bill, HR 185, which covers all sorts of things having nothing to do with Epstein. I have no idea whether the original version of HR 185 is any good, totally sucks, or is a mixed bag of compromises and deals. But itās complicated enough that it was referred to 23 committees (which presumably are each Republican-controlled).
/2 Here is a link to Massieās proposed amendment. Note the substitute and strike language highlighted in the image below. congress.gov/119/bills/hresā¦
/3 Here is a link to the full 193 pages of HR 185. (Zzzz). Note the 23 committees listed and the enactment clause in the image below. Massieās proposed amendment would substitute 4 pages of Epstein disclosure requirements for all 192 pages of HR 185 after the enactment clause, thereby circumventing 23 committeesā work on dozens of issues (for better or worse). congress.gov/119/bills/hr18ā¦
This is a LIE. Itās not opinion. It is not debatable. The bill is a MINOR amendment to the anti-boycott statute that has been on the books since 2018, and which contains absolutely no language even remotely similar to what Charlie Kirk describes here. I couldnāt care less whether people support the amendment or the existing statute. Itās not the least bit important. If you READ THE BILL (attached) youād say, who cares? But the DISHONEST anti-Israel engagement farming is motivated by something very, very dark. Something that might make you go to Hell when you die. Disgusting and evil. Vote against the bill if you want and repeal the 2018 Anti-Boycott Act if you donāt lime it. But donāt LIE just because engagement farming against the JOOS will yield you 15 dollars. Disgusting!!! š¤¢
1/ I promised a thread, with receipts, on why I regard the Durham report and investigation as minimalist shams. I never got to it because of (i) life, and (ii) other more pressing and timely matters. But now that Trump is staffing up, and now that there may be an opportunity to expose more of the abuses that our government has strained to cover up, this subject has become more pressing and timely. Iām still busy, but can deal with that by drafting this thread in parts over time and trying to keep it brief and focused (and full of typos).
2/ I concede that Durhamās prosecutions and report did result in revealing a lot of important evidence. But, as with Robocopās Secret Directive Four (Google it if you donāt know), there were lines he would not cross, at least not beyond the bare minimum. One of those Durham reveals in footnote 8 of his report and the (terse) accompanying text. Specifically, Durham was delegated certain authority by the AG to āuse classified informationā BUT Durham āhas not used this authority.ā š¤Æ
3/ I donāt have a copy of AG Order 4942-2020 in which the AG delegated this (UNUSED š¤Æ) authority to Durham. If anyone does, please share and I will update this post. Iāll wait a while before continuing this thread in the hope someone can provide a copy of Order 4942.
In the meantime, here is a copy of the underlying order showing what authority the AG had to delegate on the use of classified information.
See here: trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/presidential-aā¦
The FBI foia vault today released additional evidence of .@JakeSullivan46 using personal emails for top secret matters and his failure to help prevent Ambassador Stevensās murder in Benghazi despite actual knowledge of the danger posed to him. vault.fbi.gov/hillary-r.-cliā¦
Jake may have sent but just in case. Benghazi/Stevens/Hillary.
The US State Deptās foia website posted 1249 documents on Friday. Letās take a quick look š. foia.state.gov/Search/Resultsā¦
One foia request (not mine) ending in 07153 yields some interesting stuff on Russia/Ukraine. Including Director of Policy planning David McKeanās wife apparently invested with Rosement (Seneca?!?), and Kathy Kavalec enjoying Atlantic Council anti-Russia emails just before the 2016 election. foia.state.gov/Search/Resultsā¦