Sentencing is beginning in Jan 6 case of Audrey Southard-Rumsey
Prosecutors will ask for 6 years prison, arguing she went on "violent rampage" in Capitol. And they say, while carrying a pole, she was a "principal agitator" in the mob -- and called "for a 1776-style revolution"
Prosecutor argues Southard “led the mob toward the House Chamber” on Jan 6
“She was directly terrorizing Congress”
Prosecutor argues against the type of “caught up in the moment” defense that’s frequently invoked by Jan 6 defendants
Asst US Attorney says Southard “worked on a revolutionary manifesto”
Prosecutor says Southard sought to “install Donald Trump as President”
Defense attorney argues Southard was “very upset & very agitated”…. “Although she had a very big mouth, (Southard) didn’t have the actions of someone trying to influence” Congress
Defense says Southard didn’t carry firearm or terrorize
Defense says it was “a perfect storm that day”
On Jan 6
A unique variant of the “caught up in the moment” defense commonly invoked by Jan 6 defendants
Prosecutor: “She can believe what she wants, but she can’t go on a violent rampage because of that”
Prosecutor concludes: “It’s wrong to use violence to achieve political goals, no matter how right you think you are”
Southard’s defense makes final argument next
Defense echoes so many other Jan 6 defense attorneys by saying:
Southard “is done protesting… she lost her job, she’s received a lot of negativity” after the arrest
Defense, in an emphatic tone of voice, says Trump’s call to gather in DC ahead of Jan 6 and his “will be wild” statement were……. “outrageous”
Defense says Southard, 54, has had health conditions and “won’t be able to handle prison well because of her physical conditions”
Seeking leniency
Standby. Southard — who’s facing prospect and recommendation of six year prison term - will speak soon
Never seen anything like this … in any Jan 6 hearing. Southard is unleashing a list of grievances. She’s thrown away her written remarks, ignored her lawyer’s warning, is glaring periodically at prosecutors and has launched into something of a tirade
Standby
OK. A lot to unpack here. Potentially the most self-destructive thing I’ve seen in the 1000+ Jan 6 cases so far
Southard walked to podium clutching a paper with her written statement. She tossed it aside and says to judge “I wanted to tell you exactly what you want to hear, but I won’t. I won’t lie. There were vicious lies about me”… and she glares toward prosecutor
She glared a second time at Assistant US Attorney and says “nobody knows me”
Southard meanders through a series of points about hating strong smells, loving the paintings inside the Capitol… and being a particularly “fast walker”
She looks back at judge Amit Mehta and says “I want to tell the truth, I don’t care what happens”
Southard: “My whole dream of my life has been taken, because people have different politics than mine”
She then says Antifa was filming her on Jan 6
She then points at a police officer in the courtroom (an officer whom she allegedly saw on Jan 6)
She says points again at officer, calls him “the blonde one” and says “he was terrified”
The judge has ordered Southard to stop turning toward — and pointing at — others in courtroom
A US Marshal moved up next to Southard at podium. Right behind her as she continues speaking
Southard unleashes a series of political complaints:
“I’m terrified about what’s happening in our country”
She complains about the cost of gas and groceries
Southard then, in defiance of the allegations presented by Justice Dept says:
“I didn’t push the police officer, he pushed against me”
Southard: “I have grievances, since they don’t listen to us at the polling place”
“They don’t listen to us little people in the regular world”
Southard says “Washington DC destroys our lives”
About her defense attorney’s pledge to judge that Southard won’t protest in future, Southard says “I won’t protest because I’ll be in prison”
“Why protest? You guys don’t listen”
Southard: “I’m ashamed of this country”
Defense attorney has stepped back over to seek to calm or redirect Southard. Didn’t work
Southard to judge.. after again looking back at others in courtroom:
“When you decide to throw me in prison for doing my duty…. Think of what I now have to give up”
At her defense attorney’s urging, Southard wraps up.
“It’s not fair. It’s not right”
Judge Mehta calls for 15 min recess before announcing sentence
But…….
Asst US Attorney immediately stands to tell judge the Dept of Justice is no longer agreeing to a reduction in sentence for Ms Southard for “acceptance of responsibility”
The possible sentence recommendation just grew. Because of Southard’s words.
Standing by now for judge
Whoa
Judge adds terror enhancement in case
Feds had sought 6 years prison
New guidelines are now closer to 10 years
Judge is now quoting some of the most onerous words allegedly uttered by Southard on Jan 6,
“Pence is a traitor”
“Pelosi you socialist c***”
“Pelosi, we’re coming for that b***, traitorous c****”
She’s shaking her head as judge speaks. He notices
Judge You terrorized members of Congress, including those who believe the things you do
Judge slams Southard and other Jan 6 defendants for cloaking themselves “in patriotism”
DOJ will now ask she be sent directly to jail
FLASH: Judge sentences Audrey Southard-Rumsey to 6 years prison
Per defense attorney, it was a one-point terror enhancement
Judge Mehta: “The county you claim is oppressing you is giving you all .. the due process”
Southard comes out of courtroom and says to us: “Now you’ve got a real story!”
I asked Southard if she’d like to explain her remarks in court or what happened.
She looks and says “You’re a bunch of f**** liars. You should be ashamed of yourselves. You’re why we are in this mess”
Judge Amit Mehta paused for awhile when asked by prosecutors to order Southard jailed immediately. And he decided not to do so. He will allow her to self-surrender. Under release conditions
No estimate yet when Southard will report to prison.
She unleashed a series of vulgarities at reporters after hearing
! Just filed to @CBSNews about an outburst and episode unlike any other among the 1,000+ Jan. 6 cases
Former federal judges in their filing asking court to re-open Trump's $10 billion lawsuit vs. I.R.S.
They argue Trump and his own I.R.S. and Justice Dept are plotting together
FILING: "The parties to this case are using this lawsuit as the legal justification for these actions. This is not speculation; the parties themselves have proclaimed it"
(MORE)
Former federal judges on the slush fund
"This “settlement” is a product of collusion and is itself a fraud on the Court"
FLASH: Justice Dept confirms it is establishing $1.776 billion fund "for victims of lawfare and weaponization to be heard and seek redress"
Fund will have five members and "issue formal apologies and monetary relief owed to claimants"
Justice Dept defends $1.776 billion fund by saying, "There is legal precedent for such a Fund, most notably the Keepseagle case where the Obama Admin. created a $760 million fund to redress various claims alleging racism against the federal government over a period of decades"
And there it is:
About $1.7 billion taxpayer-funded pot of $$
Justice Dept says, "Fund will consist of a Commission of five members appointed by the Attorney General. One Member will be chosen in consultation with congressional leadership. The President can remove any member"
MORE: 93 members of the US House are seeking to make a filing in the Trump $10 billion lawsuit against his I.R.S.
They've hired former Democratic Attorney General of New Jersey Matthew Platkin to represent them
Congress has been BLASTING this Trump lawsuit
MORE: A blistering court filing has just been submitted in Florida by 93 Democratic Members of Congress opposing Trump's $10 billion lawsuit against his own I.R.S.
In part the filing says, "10 billion could fully fund almost the entire annual budget for federal child welfare spending or the National Cancer Institute for a year. Or it could be used to purchase childcare for a million young families. Instead of serving these worthy purposes, the President instead asks this Court to allow him to use collusive litigation to force the American people to put that money into his pockets, and the pockets of his family and friends"
ALERT: Group of former Justice Dept employees, w/ Washington Litigation Group, files emergency suit to HALT Trump's re-painting of Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool
Suit: "The grey, achromatic basin was not incidental to the design. It was the design"
LAWSUIT challenging Trump's repainting of Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool blasts Trump's gaudy reimaging:
"The 1999 National Park Service Cultural Landscape Report for the Lincoln Memorial Grounds specifically identifies the dark-tiled basin as a character-defining feature of the historic landscape, noting that 'the dark color of the tile created the illusion of greater depth and a more profound reflection"
(MORE) Suit challenging Trump changes to Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool:
"Defendants engaged a swimming pool contractor to resurface the Reflecting Pool.. a vivid blue coating.. Shockingly, Defendants started altering the historic character of the Reflecting Pool without following Congressionally mandatory procedures"
"All of this may be standard fare for a social media post. But in a federal court filing, it is neither appropriate nor permitted"
Historic group challenging Trump's Ballroom unleashes fiery court filing
They unequivocally accuse Justice Dept of making false claims
(MORE)
Group challenging Trump ballroom:
"Defendants claim that the National Trust was 'shown detailed plans and specifications of this knitted, unified, & cohesive structure by Top Officers and Leaders in both the Military and Secret Service.' This statement is false: The National Trust has never been shown non-public plans"
Historic preservation group suing over Trump ballroom also argues:
"The Defendants claim that the National Trust was “asked by the United States Military not to bring this suit because of the Top Secret nature of the important facility being built. This statement is false: The military did not request that the National Trust not file this suit."