Sentencing is beginning in Jan 6 case of Audrey Southard-Rumsey
Prosecutors will ask for 6 years prison, arguing she went on "violent rampage" in Capitol. And they say, while carrying a pole, she was a "principal agitator" in the mob -- and called "for a 1776-style revolution"
Prosecutor argues Southard “led the mob toward the House Chamber” on Jan 6
“She was directly terrorizing Congress”
Prosecutor argues against the type of “caught up in the moment” defense that’s frequently invoked by Jan 6 defendants
Asst US Attorney says Southard “worked on a revolutionary manifesto”
Prosecutor says Southard sought to “install Donald Trump as President”
Defense attorney argues Southard was “very upset & very agitated”…. “Although she had a very big mouth, (Southard) didn’t have the actions of someone trying to influence” Congress
Defense says Southard didn’t carry firearm or terrorize
Defense says it was “a perfect storm that day”
On Jan 6
A unique variant of the “caught up in the moment” defense commonly invoked by Jan 6 defendants
Prosecutor: “She can believe what she wants, but she can’t go on a violent rampage because of that”
Prosecutor concludes: “It’s wrong to use violence to achieve political goals, no matter how right you think you are”
Southard’s defense makes final argument next
Defense echoes so many other Jan 6 defense attorneys by saying:
Southard “is done protesting… she lost her job, she’s received a lot of negativity” after the arrest
Defense, in an emphatic tone of voice, says Trump’s call to gather in DC ahead of Jan 6 and his “will be wild” statement were……. “outrageous”
Defense says Southard, 54, has had health conditions and “won’t be able to handle prison well because of her physical conditions”
Seeking leniency
Standby. Southard — who’s facing prospect and recommendation of six year prison term - will speak soon
Never seen anything like this … in any Jan 6 hearing. Southard is unleashing a list of grievances. She’s thrown away her written remarks, ignored her lawyer’s warning, is glaring periodically at prosecutors and has launched into something of a tirade
Standby
OK. A lot to unpack here. Potentially the most self-destructive thing I’ve seen in the 1000+ Jan 6 cases so far
Southard walked to podium clutching a paper with her written statement. She tossed it aside and says to judge “I wanted to tell you exactly what you want to hear, but I won’t. I won’t lie. There were vicious lies about me”… and she glares toward prosecutor
She glared a second time at Assistant US Attorney and says “nobody knows me”
Southard meanders through a series of points about hating strong smells, loving the paintings inside the Capitol… and being a particularly “fast walker”
She looks back at judge Amit Mehta and says “I want to tell the truth, I don’t care what happens”
Southard: “My whole dream of my life has been taken, because people have different politics than mine”
She then says Antifa was filming her on Jan 6
She then points at a police officer in the courtroom (an officer whom she allegedly saw on Jan 6)
She says points again at officer, calls him “the blonde one” and says “he was terrified”
The judge has ordered Southard to stop turning toward — and pointing at — others in courtroom
A US Marshal moved up next to Southard at podium. Right behind her as she continues speaking
Southard unleashes a series of political complaints:
“I’m terrified about what’s happening in our country”
She complains about the cost of gas and groceries
Southard then, in defiance of the allegations presented by Justice Dept says:
“I didn’t push the police officer, he pushed against me”
Southard: “I have grievances, since they don’t listen to us at the polling place”
“They don’t listen to us little people in the regular world”
Southard says “Washington DC destroys our lives”
About her defense attorney’s pledge to judge that Southard won’t protest in future, Southard says “I won’t protest because I’ll be in prison”
“Why protest? You guys don’t listen”
Southard: “I’m ashamed of this country”
Defense attorney has stepped back over to seek to calm or redirect Southard. Didn’t work
Southard to judge.. after again looking back at others in courtroom:
“When you decide to throw me in prison for doing my duty…. Think of what I now have to give up”
At her defense attorney’s urging, Southard wraps up.
“It’s not fair. It’s not right”
Judge Mehta calls for 15 min recess before announcing sentence
But…….
Asst US Attorney immediately stands to tell judge the Dept of Justice is no longer agreeing to a reduction in sentence for Ms Southard for “acceptance of responsibility”
The possible sentence recommendation just grew. Because of Southard’s words.
Standing by now for judge
Whoa
Judge adds terror enhancement in case
Feds had sought 6 years prison
New guidelines are now closer to 10 years
Judge is now quoting some of the most onerous words allegedly uttered by Southard on Jan 6,
“Pence is a traitor”
“Pelosi you socialist c***”
“Pelosi, we’re coming for that b***, traitorous c****”
She’s shaking her head as judge speaks. He notices
Judge You terrorized members of Congress, including those who believe the things you do
Judge slams Southard and other Jan 6 defendants for cloaking themselves “in patriotism”
DOJ will now ask she be sent directly to jail
FLASH: Judge sentences Audrey Southard-Rumsey to 6 years prison
Per defense attorney, it was a one-point terror enhancement
Judge Mehta: “The county you claim is oppressing you is giving you all .. the due process”
Southard comes out of courtroom and says to us: “Now you’ve got a real story!”
I asked Southard if she’d like to explain her remarks in court or what happened.
She looks and says “You’re a bunch of f**** liars. You should be ashamed of yourselves. You’re why we are in this mess”
Judge Amit Mehta paused for awhile when asked by prosecutors to order Southard jailed immediately. And he decided not to do so. He will allow her to self-surrender. Under release conditions
No estimate yet when Southard will report to prison.
She unleashed a series of vulgarities at reporters after hearing
! Just filed to @CBSNews about an outburst and episode unlike any other among the 1,000+ Jan. 6 cases
CBS News has learned police seized a ghost gun that a Maryland man attempted to bring through a security checkpoint at the Cannon US House Office Building last Tuesday, June 24, when the US House was in session and was staging a series of committee hearings (more)
According to an affidavit shared with CBS News, “There was no serial number present anywhere on the firearm” and it had a barrel length of less than 12 inches and was “fully functional.”
The incident at 8:33am on June 24, just as staff and some members of the US House were arriving at the complex.
ALERT: A former Coast Guard Lieutenant and sharpshooter, who also served as a FEMA instructor, has been arrested and charged with making threats to kill President Trump. The charging documents in the case include voluminous allegations of social media between 2020 and last week
The social media posts, which span from 2020 to 2025, include on-line statements of using a gun, a knife and poison against Trump, per federal prosecutors
And they include alleged death threats made as recently as last Wednesday on social media
Judge has just ordered Pete Stinson held in jail, pending a hearing WEDNESDAY
Here are some of the alleged threats, per charging documents ===>
In a flurry of legal filings this afternoon, the Washington, D.C.-based Heritage Foundation conservative action group is asking a federal judge for a hearing TODAY or TONIGHT on the matter of the leaked audio of President Biden’s interview by then-Special Counsel Robert Hur
Heritage is asking a DC federal judge "for a temporary restraining order directing defendant to produce all recordings of former President Joseph R. Biden’s Interview with Special Counsel Robert K. Hur.. within 4 hours of this Court’s order"
Heritage and media outlets had filed Freedom of Information Act requests for the audio last year
Heritage argues the release of snippets of the audio by the Axios news service adds urgency to their request
Court filing: "How did a record subject to a claim of Executive Privilege and possibly classified make it into the hands of Axios? Add to that how did that record end up being spliced without notion? The Court must require an immediate answer to that question. This situation is untenable. Full disclosure is necessary now"
In a scathing 4-page court filing overnight, a group of FBI employees who investigated the Jan. 6 attack have asked a judge to order the Justice Department to destroy its controversial list of 5,000+ FBI employees who were part of the US Capitol Insurrection investigation (more)
The filing notes this week’s public statements by Ed Martin, the newly-named member of Justice Dept’s “weaponization” group. The group of FBI workers is worried about the list being publicized or leaked by Justice Dept, subjecting the agents to retaliation & violence (more)
The FBI employees argue that Martin publicly pledged Tuesday to “name and shame” employees inside the department.
Inside federal court in Milwaukee, awaiting 10am arraignment of Judge Hannah Dugan, whose arrest was announced by FBI Director Kash Patel last month. She’s accused of obstruction and re-routing an undocumented immigrant in her court away from agents
Judge Dugan is asking that her case be dismissed. She’s laced her argument with reference to Supreme Court’s 2024 “immunity” ruling which benefited Trump. She’s arguing her actions in her court were “official” acts
Judge Dugan’s defense argued in a filing yesterday:
“The problems with this prosecution are legion, but most immediately, the government cannot prosecute Judge Dugan because she is entitled to judicial immunity for her official acts. Immunity is not a defense to the prosecution to be determined later by a jury or court; it is an absolute bar to the prosecution at the outset”
NEW: In a blistering new order, federal judge Paula Xinis of Maryland says the Trump Administration is making "a willful and bad faith refusal to comply with discovery obligations" in the court case of Kilmar Abrego Garcia
Judge Paula Xinis also finds the Trump Admin has "sought refuge behind vague and unsubstantiated assertions of privilege, using them as a shield to obstruct discovery and evade compliance with this court's orders" in Kilmar Abrego Garcia case
The judge's order also throws shade on the Trump Admin's claim Abrego Garcia is out of their control ... in Salvadoran custody
Judge: "Indeed, custody can be joint, and custodial status may be controlled by the Defendants acting in concert with El Salvador"