A very beautiful image of the immaculate conception is contained in Zechariah 3.
🧵
When it comes to the immaculate conception, there seems to be a significant problem: one cannot be born without original sin without the grace of the incarnation. But the in order for the incarnation to happen, there has to be a sinless woman to bear God. How does we solve this?
According to Bl. John Duns Scotus, and as recieved as official Church teaching in Ineffabilis Deus, Mary was able to be concieved without sin on account of the foreseen merits of Christ.
But is there any biblical precedence for this?
We actually find a very similar situation in the books of Ezra and Zechariah.
According to Ezra, after the return from the Babylonian exile, the Jews sought to rebuild the temple. In order to consecrate the temple, they needed a ritually clean high priest.
In the vision of Zechariah, we see that Joshua the high priest in filthy garments being accused by Satan. He is ritually unclean. Now ordinarily it would be easy for the high priest to cleanse himself through sacrifice. But in order to do that, he needs a consecrated altar…
Thus the Jews are in a catch-22. They cannot consecrate the altar without a ritually pure high priest, and they cannot cleanse the priest without a consecrated altar.
So what happens? The Angel of the Lord, the preincarnate Christ, comes and gives Joshua pure vestments.
Thus, the later merits of the cleansing ritual are applied beforehand by direct divine intervention. A beautiful image of the immaculate conception.
Sts. Zechariah and Joshua, pray for us!
Most Holy Theotokos save us!
I’ve been very fascinated by this story in Zechariah ever since I read about it in A House for My Name by @PLeithart. I just realized the connection with the immaculate conception a few days ago (although Leithart would probably disagree with my application.)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In some recent threads, I showed that the biblical requirements for the messiah match better with Jesus than those laid out by the Rambam.
But that was easy mode. Let's see how the prophet Daniel predicted the exact year of the messiah would die to end sin!
A thread🧵
In the book of Daniel, Daniel receives a series of visions of 4 kingdoms. These kingdoms are traditionally identified by Jews and Christians as Babylon, Medo-Persian, Greece, and Rome.
According to Daniel 7, one like a Son of Man comes and destroys the fourth kingdom and establishes his own, everlasting kingdom. This is a clear reference to the messiah in 2 Samuel 7.
According to Christians, one of the most clear prophecies of Jesus in the Hebrew Bible is Isaiah 53. However, many Jews dispute that this passage is not about the messiah. Let's take a look at the book of Isaiah to see who is right.
A thread 🧵
In my last thread, I argued that the messiah is central to scripture. He is the promised seed who will undo the curse of Genesis 3
By 2 Samuel this seed has been narrowed down to the line of David. A seed from this line will sit upon the throne "forever"
If you opened 1 Kings for the first time, you would think this king would be Solomon. He builds a house for God's name. However, we see Solomon, and then many kings after him, lapse into grave sin.
In my last thread, I put forward a response to the Rambam's arguments for why Jesus is not the messiah.
However, I think the divide between Christians and Jews is deeper. We have different conceptions of what a messiah is. So here is a defense of the Christian view.
Thread🧵
Although world peace will come about in the time of the messiah, Jews understand the messiah to be primarily the national leader of the Jews. He will not perform any great miracles or change the nature of things.
However, Christians understand the messiah to heal all the sins of the world and fulfill the very reason for creation. While he comes from the line of David, his national kingship of the Jews is secondary to his universal salvation.
What is the meaning of the book of Job? Is God the cause of suffering? Did God really make a bet with Satan? Why does God never tell Job about His bet with Satan?
A thread on divine providence and Job 🧵
St. Thomas Aquinas explains that Job is about divine providence. This means we first need to consider the metaphysics of divine providence.
Boethius says that "Providence is the divine type itself, seated in the Supreme Ruler; which disposes all things"
God is perfectly good. Therefore, all things which God makes are good. Furthermore, when God makes all things, He knows exactly how they will act. Thus, even the smallest details of the cosmos are ruled by God's providence. Divine providence is rooted in the theology of creation.
I could literally praise Hitler and talk about how I wish the holocaust had killed every last Jew and I still wouldn’t be pure enough to lunatics like this. I know because I used to be stupid enough to try and simp for these types.
Also, I am not part of any groyper movement. If groypers are bringing people to Christ, that’s great. I support Nick converting as many people as he can. Nick is not beyond criticism though. I am not part of his movement.
@AleMartnezR1 I did some videos on his proof for God near the very beginning of my channel. I ramble a lot in them (it was my first time making youtube videos) but hopefully I explain things well. Jeremy Daggett also has a very helpful paper in the festschrift for Peter Damian Fehlner.
@AleMartnezR1 The argument essentially turns on the S5 modal axiom that whatever is possible is necessarily possible. Scotus is concerned that traditional arguments from contingency move from a contingent premise to a necessary conclusion (which he thinks is impossible), so he argues...
@AleMartnezR1 ...from the necessity of the possibility of the existence of contingent things.