(1/24) Returning to tanks, today I'd like to talk about the Ukrainian T-72AMT.
(2/24) Prior to 2014, Ukraine did not use T-72s in first-line ZSU units, which were equipped exclusively with T-64BVs. They did use some in training schools, like the one in Kyiv, but most were in storage or exported overseas. One of these export models was the T-72UA-1.
(3/24) The T-72UA-1 (also known as the T-72B1-1050 in some sources) had its V-84 V-12 engine replaced by the 1,050 hp 5TDFMA engine, which required modifications to the engine compartment and exhaust. It also features the Nizh shaped-charge array ERA.
(5/24) Regardless, after 2014 it became clear that the existing T-64 stocks would not be sufficient to both replace losses and expand the Ukrainian tank force. Thus, the ZSU began receiving T-72s, including at least one T-72UA-1, in December 2014.
(6/24) In addition to T-72Bs, the ZSU also received older T-72AVs. I've previously talked about how Cold War vintage T-72A/Bs generally have more primitive fire control than T-64/80Bs, so this was one area where improvement was needed.
(7/24) One thing I did not mention is that the TPD-K1 / 1A40 (right) have a fixed 4x magnification setting, a disadvantage compared to the 1G42 of the Ob SUO (left), which can do 3.9–9x, especially at long ranges, as the tanker Dominikanets notes.
(8/24) Nevertheless, the T-72A/Bs proved quite useful and primarily equipped what were then (before 2022) reserve tank units like the 3rd Tank Brigade (3 OTBr) formed in 2016.
(9/24) In 2017, on their own private initiative, the Kyiv AFV Factory (KBTZ), the primary factory responsible for the upkeep of Ukrainian T-72s, unveiled their T-72 moderisation project, the T-72AMT.
(10/24) Drawing on their experience with the T-72UA-1 (which it very clearly has some resemblance to) and other T-72 modernisation projects for export, KBTZ implemented a lot of features desired by the ZSU.
(11/) These included the T-64BV's remote controlled AAMG mounting and motorised commander cupola, replacing the virtually useless manual T-72 AAMG that required the commander to expose himself to use it...
(12/24) ...the 1K13 integrated night/missile guidance sight from the T-72B, allowing it to use the Ukrainian Kombat laser beam-riding gun-launched ATGM, thus improving its ability to fight at longer ranges...
(13/24) ...Nizh ERA, as found on the T-72UA-1. However, the T-72AMT uses the Bulat's hull side panels instead of Kontakt-1 boxes like the 'UA-1.
(14/24) The T-72AMT package also includes other 'invisible' but important upgrades, like the SN-3003 satnav and Turkish Aselsan or Ukrainian Lybid radios replacing the laughably obsolete Soviet R-123/173 radios, in line with the contemporary T-64 modernisation project.
(15/24) It does not appear that a thermal sight was fitted originally, as the T-72AMT still retained the Luna IR searchlight; an unfortunate oversight, but likely because the TPN1 TPV and 1K13 were competing for the same gunner auxiliary sight port.
(16/24) The T-72AMT also uses the 840 hp V-84-1, replacing the T-72A's original 780 hp V-46 engine. Furthermore, an APU is provided in the full package. The single-pin tracks were also replaced with the T-80's double-pin tracks with internal rubber pads.
(17/24) The T-72AMT was accepted into Ukrainian service, and the first T-72AMT tank was handed over to the ZSU in December 2018.
(18/24) At least 39 T-72AMTs had been delivered by April 2021, and the article from Defense Express suggests that the ZSU may have received 2 battalions' worth of the tanks (62) prior to 2022.
(19/24) It should be noted that not all T-72AMTs may have received the full upgrade package. For example, these T-72AMTs delivered in April 2020 retained the old T-72A cupola and AAMG.
(20/24) These tanks are being used during the ongoing fighting. I do not know how they are faring in combat, but they seem to have suffered relatively few complete losses, with only 7 destroyed. 6 more have been captured, according to Oryxspioenkop.
(21/24) Late in 2022, an interesting variant of the T-72AMT appeared in Ukrainian service.
(22/24) This variant has no Luna IR searchlight anymore, which suggests that it now has a thermal sight of some kind. Likely the 1K13 MBT, which Trimen is known to have developed.
(23/24) There is also at least one other variant that retains the old T-72 commander cupola as well. I do not know how many of either variant has been completed. And the Ukrainians certainly aren't telling.
(24/24) There was a YT video I once saw that was pretty critical of the 'AMT, saying it would not be a match for Russian tanks. I think that's missing the point: you have to think about how it fits into the army's needs as a whole, and the 'AMT reflects the ZSU's priorities.
I should add that the tank was also demonstrated to a Polish delegation. Defense Express was pretty positive about it, though I think @LeszekMNowak was part of the delegation and he had a different impression.
(1/10) Vasiliy Chobitok recently wrote an article explaining some misconceptions about the T-80UD (478B/BE/D/DU etc.) designations. Basically, the key differentiating point between the 478B and 478D series is the presence of the Shtora/Varta electro-optical jammers.
(2/10) Won't translate whole article, just outline key variants. 'Classic' 1987/89 T-80UD (blueprint 478Bsb-1): 'early' (blueprint/right #187 in the famous coup photo), 'late' (left/centre in photo) has heat shield on the engine compartment roof.
(3/10) Pakistan export T-80UD (478BE, blueprint 478BEsb): improved fire control with T01-K01E (TPN-4E Buran-E) sight (Luna IR lamp removed), modifications to 6TD-1 cooling and filters to suit Pakistani climate, using engine roof designed for 6TD-2 to accommodate them.
BTL-1 was designed in 1970 by the Malyshev factory's train design dept (Malyshev did more than just build T-64s) for service in the Far East against the Chinese. The concept is based on some German WW2 Panzerzüge with tanks fighting from flatcars.
In this video, they are using early production T-54s with rear overhang turrets (the so-called '1947/1949 models'), but essentially any tank (or Shilkas etc.) could be put on it as desired.
As originally designed, Malva used the gun and breech assembly of the Msta-S, complete with the semi-automatic loading system for charges and projectiles. Some used Msta-B barrels without the fume extractor.
Msta-B has a different breech design and ramming system, thus can be excluded at least based on the breech.