When We Get Back Home was a humorous Japanese occupation-era comic series depicting what American soldiers would do when they returned from their time in Japan.
The series is an excellent glimpse into how Americans viewed Japan.
You have to start with the intro: the GI comes home and he speaks sayonara, wears geta on his feet, and carries a wagasa to avoid the sun and rain.
The author, Bill Hume, described this as "He has become definitely and deliriously Asiatic."
The wives just don't get it.
When asked a negative question, a Japanese "yes" is an American "no" and vice-versa.
Q: Have you gone yet?
Japanese answer: Yes, I haven't.
The Japanese cigarette is a shingarette, and tabacco refers to any type of smokes
The boy in this picture probably lit it, because the soldiers got used to a boy-san or girl-san always being available to light their smokes when they were in Japan
The customer service isn't new!
This soldier got used to being brought a wet towel to wipe his brow and clean his hands when he entered a restaurant.
Another thing: even in this time period, the Japanese didn't care for tips and they employed people to do very simple tasks, like always filling up water glasses
To the newly-Japanese GI, things aren't "okay", they're "dai-jobu"!
There was a time when taking your shoes off to enter the home was foreign to Americans. The practice came from the Japanese!
The GI likes the sane and simple Japanese room, so he's bringing it home - take a seat, everyone!
This is when America learned about the futon!
Around the fifth of May, it's time for the Boys' Festival, so up go the carp
Japanese festivals are a wonderful thing. It seems they have one for just about everybody
Later in the year, there's the Doll Festival for girls; those GIs better get to acquiring some ceremonial dolls
That noren looks a little shabby, doesn't it?
Everyone's letters are a constant reminder from the States: the people want silk!
Lucky for him, it's not all that expensive over in Nippon.
Many GIs learned the correct, Japanese, way to bathe.
You're going to be squatting with these new toilets.
No more paper routes - you're a taxi service now.
The piggy-back ride is a treat for American youngsters, but for Japanese kids, it's an everyday occurrence.
It's true, these wood shoes beat clogs any day.
This is when Americans learned about the "kodomo", or bowl cut.
School uniforms? If I have to....
Many a short GI lamented his return.
Japanese women, and geishas especially, had a funny type of pillow, designed ingenuously so they didn't have to take their hair out of its flamboyant coiffure.
When it's time to fish, propriety gives way to practicality.
Sushi? What's that?
It's tea time all the time!
Masking is nothing new to the Japanese.
The Japanese habit of train mobbing was a thing then too.
Some GIs seem to appreciate the curious cockney of Japanese signage.
When calculation is required, it's time to reach for your soroban.
Japanese scaffolding looks a little haphazard.
Left-to-right? No! Right-to-left.
When using the telephone, it's important to be polite: always two "moshis", never one.
If you're looking for more occupation-era cartoons, I can recommend Babysan, although it is much more crass and its focus is a lot more lurid. https://t.co/GcQne4xrfItwitter.com/i/web/status/1…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This research directly militates against modern blood libel.
If people knew, for example, that Black and White men earned the same amounts on average at the same IQs, they would likely be a lot less convinced by basically-false discrimination narratives blaming Whites.
Add in that the intelligence differences cannot be explained by discrimination—because there *is* measurement invariance—and these sorts of findings are incredibly damning for discrimination-based narratives of racial inequality.
So, said findings must be condemned, proscribed.
The above chart is from the NLSY '79, but it replicates in plenty of other datasets, because it is broadly true.
For example, here are three independent replications:
A lot of the major pieces of civil rights legislation were passed by White elites who were upset at the violence generated by the Great Migration and the riots.
Because of his association with this violence, most people at the time came to dislike MLK.
It's only *after* his death, and with his public beatification that he's come to enjoy a good reputation.
This comic from 1967 is a much better summation of how the public viewed him than what people are generally taught today.
And yes, he was viewed better by Blacks than by Whites.
But remember, at the time, Whites were almost nine-tenths of the population.
Near his death, Whites were maybe one-quarter favorable to MLK, and most of that favorability was weak.
The researcher who put together these numbers was investigated and almost charged with a crime for bringing these numbers to light when she hadn't received permission.
Greater Male Variability rarely makes for an adequate explanation of sex differences in performance.
One exception may be the number of papers published by academics.
If you remove the top 7.5% of men, there's no longer a gap!
The disciplines covered here were ones with relatively equal sex ratios: Education, Nursing & Caring Science, Psychology, Public Health, Sociology, and Social Work.
Because these are stats on professors, this means that if there's greater male variability, it's mostly right-tail
Despite this, the very highest-performing women actually outperformed the very highest-performing men on average, albeit slightly.
The percentiles in this image are for the combined group, so these findings coexist for composition reasons.