When We Get Back Home was a humorous Japanese occupation-era comic series depicting what American soldiers would do when they returned from their time in Japan.
The series is an excellent glimpse into how Americans viewed Japan.
You have to start with the intro: the GI comes home and he speaks sayonara, wears geta on his feet, and carries a wagasa to avoid the sun and rain.
The author, Bill Hume, described this as "He has become definitely and deliriously Asiatic."
The wives just don't get it.
When asked a negative question, a Japanese "yes" is an American "no" and vice-versa.
Q: Have you gone yet?
Japanese answer: Yes, I haven't.
The Japanese cigarette is a shingarette, and tabacco refers to any type of smokes
The boy in this picture probably lit it, because the soldiers got used to a boy-san or girl-san always being available to light their smokes when they were in Japan
The customer service isn't new!
This soldier got used to being brought a wet towel to wipe his brow and clean his hands when he entered a restaurant.
Another thing: even in this time period, the Japanese didn't care for tips and they employed people to do very simple tasks, like always filling up water glasses
To the newly-Japanese GI, things aren't "okay", they're "dai-jobu"!
There was a time when taking your shoes off to enter the home was foreign to Americans. The practice came from the Japanese!
The GI likes the sane and simple Japanese room, so he's bringing it home - take a seat, everyone!
This is when America learned about the futon!
Around the fifth of May, it's time for the Boys' Festival, so up go the carp
Japanese festivals are a wonderful thing. It seems they have one for just about everybody
Later in the year, there's the Doll Festival for girls; those GIs better get to acquiring some ceremonial dolls
That noren looks a little shabby, doesn't it?
Everyone's letters are a constant reminder from the States: the people want silk!
Lucky for him, it's not all that expensive over in Nippon.
Many GIs learned the correct, Japanese, way to bathe.
You're going to be squatting with these new toilets.
No more paper routes - you're a taxi service now.
The piggy-back ride is a treat for American youngsters, but for Japanese kids, it's an everyday occurrence.
It's true, these wood shoes beat clogs any day.
This is when Americans learned about the "kodomo", or bowl cut.
School uniforms? If I have to....
Many a short GI lamented his return.
Japanese women, and geishas especially, had a funny type of pillow, designed ingenuously so they didn't have to take their hair out of its flamboyant coiffure.
When it's time to fish, propriety gives way to practicality.
Sushi? What's that?
It's tea time all the time!
Masking is nothing new to the Japanese.
The Japanese habit of train mobbing was a thing then too.
Some GIs seem to appreciate the curious cockney of Japanese signage.
When calculation is required, it's time to reach for your soroban.
Japanese scaffolding looks a little haphazard.
Left-to-right? No! Right-to-left.
When using the telephone, it's important to be polite: always two "moshis", never one.
If you're looking for more occupation-era cartoons, I can recommend Babysan, although it is much more crass and its focus is a lot more lurid. https://t.co/GcQne4xrfItwitter.com/i/web/status/1…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Why have testosterone levels been rising over time?
The testosterone levels of American men are up compared to what they used to be, but no one has a good explanation.
Let's look through some possibilities🧵
Is it perhaps because of a racial composition change?
No.
Different races tend to have similar testosterone levels and trends within groups are similar.
Is it perhaps because of age composition change?
No.
The decline by age is much more graceful than people tend to suspect, and within each age group, levels are up without survey weighting, and in nearly all with it, they're still up.
In my latest article, I documented that the only RCT for functional medicine methods appears fraudulent🧵
Before getting into it, what's functional medicine?
It's a pseudoscience used to bilk patients by getting them on an unending cycle of tests, supplements, and more tests.
Functional medicine's practitioners claim that they can reveal and treat so-called "root causes" of people's health problems
These are proposed to be things like gut health, toxin burdens, and various chemical and hormonal imbalances
They find these things with unproven tests
If you run enough tests, you will be able to find something that looks 'off' about a patient, and if you're a functional medicine doctor, that's your 'A-ha!' moment, even if—as is usually the case—the result is just a false-positive and treating it is unlikely to do anything.
If you want to add beds to a hospital, build facilities, purchase diagnostic scanners, but you live somewhere with CON laws, then you have to prove you're not creating competition for other medical facilities in the area, which is often the whole state.
No. Competition. Allowed.
The idea behind these laws is that people will spend excessively on healthcare, so to combat that, we'll have people report if there's more spending needed before approving it.
Nutrition science is the area of science that's suffered the most in the replication crisis. It is a graveyard of theories and pseudoscientific bullshit.
Now:
The HHS is going to make doctors to sit through 40 hours of classes where they'll have to take that bullshit seriously.
This reads like a list of the things that fared the worst in all of nutrition science and stuff with NO EVIDENCE.
When I read through this, my mouth was agape.
Whoever wrote this trash needs fired for incompetence. Mentally retarded people should not hold keep government posts.
'What did you learn in your mandatory nutrition misinformation class?'
'Well, if a patient comes in with a migraine, I'm supposed to sell them a WHOOP bracelet or an Oura ring so I can help them figure out their health age.'
Strength training is a highly effective way to improve your flexibility, and I've made a graphic to put this into understandable terms:
This is from a meta-analysis of strength training trials.
What makes that so useful is that there's major publication bias for strength outcomes (pictured).
But, since authors weren't looking at it, there's no publication bias for flexibility outcomes.
Studies made their way into this meta-analysis because they had a flexibility outcome, but they made their way into the literature because they showed positive strength results.
This could indirectly biased the flexibility results because of selection on a correlated outcome.