When We Get Back Home was a humorous Japanese occupation-era comic series depicting what American soldiers would do when they returned from their time in Japan.
The series is an excellent glimpse into how Americans viewed Japan.
You have to start with the intro: the GI comes home and he speaks sayonara, wears geta on his feet, and carries a wagasa to avoid the sun and rain.
The author, Bill Hume, described this as "He has become definitely and deliriously Asiatic."
The wives just don't get it.
When asked a negative question, a Japanese "yes" is an American "no" and vice-versa.
Q: Have you gone yet?
Japanese answer: Yes, I haven't.
The Japanese cigarette is a shingarette, and tabacco refers to any type of smokes
The boy in this picture probably lit it, because the soldiers got used to a boy-san or girl-san always being available to light their smokes when they were in Japan
The customer service isn't new!
This soldier got used to being brought a wet towel to wipe his brow and clean his hands when he entered a restaurant.
Another thing: even in this time period, the Japanese didn't care for tips and they employed people to do very simple tasks, like always filling up water glasses
To the newly-Japanese GI, things aren't "okay", they're "dai-jobu"!
There was a time when taking your shoes off to enter the home was foreign to Americans. The practice came from the Japanese!
The GI likes the sane and simple Japanese room, so he's bringing it home - take a seat, everyone!
This is when America learned about the futon!
Around the fifth of May, it's time for the Boys' Festival, so up go the carp
Japanese festivals are a wonderful thing. It seems they have one for just about everybody
Later in the year, there's the Doll Festival for girls; those GIs better get to acquiring some ceremonial dolls
That noren looks a little shabby, doesn't it?
Everyone's letters are a constant reminder from the States: the people want silk!
Lucky for him, it's not all that expensive over in Nippon.
Many GIs learned the correct, Japanese, way to bathe.
You're going to be squatting with these new toilets.
No more paper routes - you're a taxi service now.
The piggy-back ride is a treat for American youngsters, but for Japanese kids, it's an everyday occurrence.
It's true, these wood shoes beat clogs any day.
This is when Americans learned about the "kodomo", or bowl cut.
School uniforms? If I have to....
Many a short GI lamented his return.
Japanese women, and geishas especially, had a funny type of pillow, designed ingenuously so they didn't have to take their hair out of its flamboyant coiffure.
When it's time to fish, propriety gives way to practicality.
Sushi? What's that?
It's tea time all the time!
Masking is nothing new to the Japanese.
The Japanese habit of train mobbing was a thing then too.
Some GIs seem to appreciate the curious cockney of Japanese signage.
When calculation is required, it's time to reach for your soroban.
Japanese scaffolding looks a little haphazard.
Left-to-right? No! Right-to-left.
When using the telephone, it's important to be polite: always two "moshis", never one.
If you're looking for more occupation-era cartoons, I can recommend Babysan, although it is much more crass and its focus is a lot more lurid. https://t.co/GcQne4xrfItwitter.com/i/web/status/1…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
World War I devastated Britain and likely slowed down its technological progress🧵
The reason being, the youth are the engine of innovation.
Areas that saw more deaths saw larger declines in patenting in the years following the war.
To figure out the innovation effects of losing a large portion of a generation's young men who were just coming into the primes of their lives, the authors needed four pieces of data.
The first were the numbers and pre-war locations of soldiers who died.
The next components were the numbers and locations of patent filings.
If you look at both graphs, you see obvious total population effects. So, areas must be normalized.
You know how most books on Amazon are AI slop now? If you didn't, look at the publication numbers.
Compare those to the proportion Pangram flags as AI-generated. It's fully aligned with the implied numbers based on the rise over 2022 publication levels!
Similarly, the rise of pro se litigants has come with a rise in case filings detected as being AI-generated, and with virtually zero false-positives before AI was around.
Pierre Guillaume Frédéric le Play argued that France's early fertility decline was driven by its inheritance reforms, where estates had to be split up equally to all of the kids, including the girls.
There's likely something to this!🧵
For reference, the French Revolution ushered in a number of egalitarian laws.
A major example of these had to do with inheritance, and in particular with partibility.
In some areas of France, there was partible inheritance, and in others, it was impartible.
Partible inheritance refers to inheritance spread among all of a person's heirs, sometimes including girls, sometimes not.
Impartible inheritance on the other hands refers to the situation where the head of an estate can nominate a particular heir to get all or a select portion.
In terms of their employment, religion, and sex, people who joined the Nazi party started off incredibly distinct from the people in their communities.
It's only near the end of WWII when they started resembling everyday Germans.
Early on, a lot of this dissimilarity is due to hysteresis.
Even as the party was growing, people were selectively recruited because they were often recruited by their out-of-place friends, and they were themselves out-of-place.
It took huge growth to break that.
And you can see the decline of fervor based on the decline of Nazi imagery in people's portraits.
And while this is observed by-and-large, it's not observed among the SS, who had a consistently higher rate of symbolic fanaticism.
I simulated 100,000 people to show how often people are "thrice-exceptional": Smart, stable, and exceptionally hard-working.
I've highlighted these people in red in this chart:
If you reorient the chart to a bird's eye view, it looks like this:
In short, there are not many people who are thrice-exceptional, in the sense of being at least +2 standard deviations in conscientiousness, emotional stability (i.e., inverse neuroticism), and intelligence.
To replicate this, use 42 as the seed and assume linearity and normality
The decline of trust is something worth caring about, and reversing it is something worth doing.
We should not have to live constantly wondering if we're being lied to or scammed. Trust should be possible again.
I don't know how we go about regaining trust and promoting trustworthiness in society.
It feels like there's an immense level of toleration of untrustworthy behavior from everyone: scams are openly funded; academics congratulate their fraudster peers; all content is now slop.
What China's doing—corruption crackdowns and arresting fraudsters—seems laudable, and I think the U.S. and other Western nations should follow suit.
Fraud leads to so many lives being lost and so much progress being halted or delayed.