🧵Westminster Political Party Leaders and Sex vs Gender:
As we begin, very slowly, to gear up towards the next General Election, I decided to take a look at where the leaders of our elected political parties in Westminster stand on the ongoing debate around sex vs gender:
(1/12)
Keir Starmer (Labour):
Keir believes that ‘1 in 1,000’ women have a penis.
He proposes banning ‘conversion therapy’, which could criminalise therapists and parents who don’t affirm medical transition.
Jeffrey issued an “apology” on behalf of the party to the “LGBTQIA” community.
He became the first leader of the DUP to meet with the Rainbow Project, who support children to seek medical transition, as well as breast binding/genital tucking.
(9/12)
Rishi Sunak (Conservative):
Rishi has said that “100% of women do not have a penis”.
He used Section 35 to block Scotland’s attempt to introduce ‘self-ID’.
He has pledged to protect single-sex spaces for women under law.
He has told schools not to transition pupils.
(10/12)
Notice a difference?
Only one political party currently elected to Westminster stands up for biological reality, child wellbeing and women’s rights.
We need to send a message to those seeking election that they will not get our vote if they push gender ideology.
(11/12)
To note - I could not find anything relevant from Colum Eastwood (SDLP) or Joe Fortune (Co-Operative).
(12/12)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🧵Thread: Celebrating CEO of Stonewall, Nancy Kelley:
Given today’s sad news that Nancy Kelley is leaving Stonewall at the end of this month, I thought it would be a nice send off for her to compile the greatest achievements she presided over during the past 3 years:
(1/13)
We witnessed the disintegration of Stonewall’s ‘Diversity Champions Programme’, with swathes of organisations leaving the scheme altogether.
One government minister even stated that he was “delighted” when his department announced that it was cutting ties with Stonewall.
(2/13)
Nancy came under significant fire for attempting to draw an abhorrent comparison between those with gender critical beliefs (which are protected under the Equality Act 2010) and “anti-semitism”.
(3/13) thejc.com/news/uk/anger-…
We need to make sure that private clinics, such as the disgraced GenderGP, are held to account if they attempt to deviate from this official NHS guidance.
For my sins, I have compiled list of every lie spouted in Bridges’ statement:
1. Nobody has been ‘banned’ from racing. Everyone remains fully entitled to take part in sporting categories corresponding to their biological sex.
(1/11)
2. British Cycling do have the authority in this conversation. They are the governing body.
3. There is zero correlation between the funding of British Cycling and the government’s migration policy.
4. The UK government does not violently clamp down on dissent.
(2/11)
5. The UK government does not starve its people.
6. There is no evidence of British Cycling encouraging eating disorders.
7. British Cycling is not a failed organisation. It has had huge success on an international stage over the years.
(3/11)