1) The latest demonic PR campaign is to try now to get the alternate electors from Arizona indicted. This is led by the hyenapickle phony AG Mayes.
2) The focus-grouped memo term they are using is "fake electors."
3) No such thing.
4) In 1960 (I won't review the circumstances again) Hawaii quickly certified one candidate and approved a set of electors that was sent in; but then the governor approved a different set and a recount led to a third set.
5) ALL reached the desk of the President of the Senate.
6) In that case, it was Richard Nixon, who had an incentive to accept the slate saying HE won. He took the recount, most recent, slate saying JFK won.
7) None of those were "fake." They were all legitimate because it is up to the Veep/President of the Senate to decide . . .
7) contd . . . what do do with COMPETING sets of electoral slates. COMPETING does not mean "fake." These are contested elections.
8) Once the Veep/Pres of Senate receives the slate(s), he can . . .
8) . . .a) accept them as is; b) reject them as fraudulent; or c) entertain a motion from the floor challenging them.
9) Has this happened? Abso-freakin-lutely.
10) In 1797 when the electors were being counted, Veep John Adams, one of the candidates with Thomas Jefferson . .
10) . . . received a slate (can't recall if it was from Georgia or New Hampshire) that was not legally written as the Constitution required.
11) When Adams came to this slate--which would have given the election to TJ---he stopped & waited for an objection from the floor.
12) After a few moments, when Jefferson or his allies did not object, he allowed the slate (for him) and won the election.
13) In 1800, Jefferson was veep and was counting and another incorrectly written slate arrived. Again, this would have cost TJ the election.
14) Unlike Adams, Jefferson did not allow any time for a challenge and won.
15) In 2021, the expectation was that Pence would NEITHER accept the so-called "legitimate" slates or reject the contested slates but would use the third option, entertain a motion from the floor to . .
15) contd . . . adjourn to the respective chambers and let Congress deal with it.
16) Botoxic's evil pus-spawns in the DemoKKKrat House would have taken 30 seconds to reject contested slates. But in the Senate, the thought was that the Senate would at least HEAR evidence . . .
16) contd . . . before handing the election to Rutabatga. (There was never, ever any chance Pence---contrary to hopes---would simply accept the contested electors over the Rutabaga electors, only that he would allow fraud evidence to be presented).
17) Again, the reality was that the Senate was never going to accept the contested electoral slates. The only hope was they would at least get to publicly expose the fraud.
18) Josh Hawley and a congressman (I forget who) had the objection ready. Then the crowds came in.
19) When Pence got around to counting, he never recognized Hawley or the congressman for their objections, betraying all those just a few days earlier he had promised he would do.
20) So the only thing "fake" in these discussions of electors are AGs like Mayes.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
There are so many of you who are new followers that you probably haven't seen a lot of my longer screeds that explain some of my positions. So I'd like to take a moment this morning to review.
2) Basic 1: The DemoKKKrats are the Party of Slavery. Why?
2) contd. As explained in my "Seven Events that Made America" & in "Patriot's History of the US," in 1820 Martin Van Burn, state congressman from NY, was jolted (as was Jefferson) by passage of the Missouri Compromise.
3) This concerned him because he thought it meant civil war. His reasoning: the MC set an imaginary line (34/30) at the bottom of Missouri: any new state entering the Union ABOVE that line MUST be free (virtually all). At the time, Dakotas, MN, IA, NE, KS, ID, WY, MT, CO.
1) In 1968, Peter Tork of the "Monkees" had a party in Laurel Canyon, most likely at Joni Mitchell's house. Steve Stills, David Crosby, & Graham Nash were there and Nash pulled out a Stills song, saying, "let's sing this."
2) Although pairs of them had sung together before, this was the first time all three collaborated.
Nash said, "Whatever sound Crosby, Stills, and Nash has was born in 30 seconds. That's how long it took us to harmonize."
3) Accident number 2: Legendary producer George "Shadow" Morton (see below with my director Marc Leif & friend Esteban Lopez during filming of my movie "Rockin' the Wall") who had discovered Janis Ian, produced Vanilla Fudge, and by then was doing a new group called . . . .
I will do a full review of "Breaking History" by Jared Kushner later, but two parts stand out.
First, while many of us disagreed with H.R. McMaster on some of his positions, according to Kushner he was a loyal soldier who pushed back but when Trump decided, the totally complied
Second, John Kelly was an absolute snake. He not only pettily tried to expand his little kingdom, moving to keep Kushner out of meetings---when Trump trusted him because he didn't leak & got crap done!---but are you ready for this? . . .
Kelly listened in on Trump's phone calls without informing the President.
Folks the ONLY question that should ever be asked is not "Why didn't Trump do x?" But
HOW IN THE HELL DID HE DO ANYTHING?
1) I know Dobbs, Aff Action, and the 2A cases were sexier, but in the long term, the Court probably did more damage to the Deep State in the 2 EPA cases and the 5th Circuit's SEC case than you can imagine.
2) Unlike Dobbs or Bruen, you won't see a change instantly, but the Court & Fifth have deeply wounded the Swamp/Administrative State's ability to set its own rules and expand.
3) No one noticed at the time because of his goofy logic on Obamacare, but buried within that decision John Roberts severely undercut the ability of the Administrative State to use the Commerce Clause to expand. So they have no fall-back now.
1) Brief review of @barnes_law on his segment tonight;
2) The Hunter Biteme case is so extraordinarily out-of-bounds of even federal REQUIREMENTS that it could only have come from Grand Moff Garland or his Deputy. This was top down.
@barnes_law 3) We do not know the extent of any IMMUNITY Hunter might have gotten in the plea deal.
4) Still thinks Rutabaga will pardon Trump due to the need to protect Hunter from other crimes.
5) False that Trump can't get attorneys to represent him. A few, but not many.
@barnes_law 6) (Zen Master agrees on this): the "speedy trial" requirement forced the trial to be listed in August, but almost no chance this goes to trial before November 2024.
For ex: once you get past Dec., we will be in election season and Barnes thinks no one will start a trial then.