The hospital at the centre of the iatrogenic murder scandal of @evlaica's husband is @RCHTWeCare
The twitter handle is inappropriate.
If you are a nurse at #Treliske hospital who wants to get your story out anonymously, my DMs are open.
🧵
As presented, this story from @JacquiDeevoy1 represents an iatrogenic (doctor-caused) death no different from those resulting from Harold Shipman's serial murder campaign.
All Stuart needed was #3tablets antibiotics for a chest infection.
...according to his wife's testimony he was physically restrained, catheterised and forcibly injected with high dose opiates and #midazolam without consent.
This would constitute an illegal act of assault leading to an unlawful death.
Deaths arising from medical malpractice may be categorised as manslaughter in the UK.
@EVlaica's testimony is that the consultant concerned disagreed with Stuart's medical choices and as a consequence deliberately mismanaged him.
That is no longer manslaughter under UK law, sorry @RCHTWeCare, it's murder.
And unfortunately for @RCHTWeCare you are under mandatory reporting rules.
Which means that if you were aware of this act and failed to report the consultant concerned, you inherit liability.
Nobody reading the story in Jacqui's report can take away anything other than a deliberate intention to deny antibiotics at first presentation and then to administer respiratory depressants, which will kill you if you have pneumonia.
That is the #midazolam scandal that killed over 100,000 British people.
Instead of treating early for post-viral pneumonia, elderly, disabled, infirm, or - in the case of @RCHTWeCare - anybody that disagreed with the government mantra, were denied antibiotics and instead given drugs that hastened their death.
And - for those who shout "antibiotics don't treat viruses" - the following drugs do NOT treat bacterial pneumonia.
@Yale could be up to their necks in the biggest HIPAA scandal since @UChicago
This is how the scam appears to have worked.
Harlan Krumholz owns a patent for managing health data through an app. "Hugo health" was the middle man providing the app to bait people claiming to be vaccine injured to join a study called LISTEN. But it was essentially being run on behalf of Pfizer/Janssen who paid him $3m in "research grants".
Thousands of injured signed up but only 241 patients were used in the "study" of which the publications were irrelevant and showed nothing other than "the vaccines saved millions of lives" bla bla. Nothing helpful for the vaccine injured at all.
But the bombshell - the data that they provided was able to be sold off to anyone they wanted to. It was in the consent form that most people didn't read. The data was held on hugo.health which has now gone. It was NOT HIPAA compliant.
How did we know that hugo.health's servers were not HIPAA compliant?
Yale told the participants in a email in July 2024 (attached).
So where did all that health data go?
Was it sold off to the highest bidder or used in a blackmail campaign against vulnerable people who were vaccine injured and couldn't work? (Like those that have targeted our accounts recently)
We don't know. But you can be damn sure that Yale knows, and took secret action to remedy the situation having already taken millions of dollars from pharma to run studies that undermined the vaccine injured.
That is why there is so much animosity suddenly being directed at the vaccine injured. They want to bury this story.
Yale could be in very big trouble.
They deserve a hashtag.
#YaleGate
@Yale @UChicago For those confused, please understand what a "limited hangout" is here. While you are rejoicing on the scraps of Daily Mail fodder, the pharma companies' new narrative is enshrined by those very articles.
@jsm2334 I have 3 new questions:
1⃣ why didn't you appear on the Razzaghi paper using your data?
2⃣ is your data synthetic?
3⃣ what is the binomial probability that 18/20 of a university's research team come from a group that comprises 2% of the US population, if all groups are equal?
@jsm2334 For those confused... The original thread on #OHDSI - the data curators claiming an impossible 96% efficacy rate for a type-mismatched vaccine against infection - is here.
Match to BGH [NM_180996.1]: (114/226bp)
CTGTGCCTTCTAGTTGCCAGCCATCTGTTGTTTGCCCCTCCCCCGTGCCTTCCTTGACCCTGGAAGGTGCCACTCCCACTGTCCTTTCCTAATAAAATGAGGAAATTGCATCGC
So there are 112 bp in the BGH PolyA cassette which are not in the BGH gene transcript, and presumably make that cassette as efficient as the SV40 PolyA as described in Goodwin 1992...
@DiedSuddenly_ @JesslovesMJK @Kevin_McKernan Also note the "ribbon" pictures after nearly two years have none of the diatheses seen in the other images. Totally clean. After 499 days. 🙄
Sorry but this is not a believable study.
1⃣ ORCID ID record for Lee is blank, she is not a molecular biologist (& address does not validate)
2⃣ No ethics approval despite clinical samples (blood and semen - seriously?)
3⃣ Vials were incubated for a year without bacterial or fungal growth - these people have never done cell culture.
4⃣Quoting #Sashagate as a source in scientific paper is a massive red flag
My view reading this is:
This paper was submitted to the IJVTPR to discredit it because it's one of the few journals that allows criticism of pharmaceutical companies.
I'm happy to reconsider if you can find a valid publication record for Young Mi Lee at that address.
@DiedSuddenly_ A bowling alley?
I can't find any record of "Hanna Gynecologist Clinic" using that provided address either.