Many of Judaism's most important sites are located here.
You might hear this site referred to as the Ibrahimi Mosque, but it's also called:
🔹 Cave of Machpelah
🔹 Cave of the Patriarchs
🔹 Tomb of the Patriarchs
Rachel's Tomb is a holy site for Jews, Christians and Muslims alike.
Even in the last 24 hours, when PIJ gunmen opened fire on Jewish worshipers at Joseph's Tomb, outlets outrageously either completely ignored or tried to hide the Jewish significance of the site.
🕍 Eshtemoa was described as a large Jewish village during the Roman & Byzantine period.
🕍 The Jericho synagogue has a mosaic floor which incorporates Jewish symbols such as the Ark of the Covenant, the Temple Menorah, a shofar and a lulav.
The two headlines at the bottom of this image are just two of the many many many stories which talk of Jews "storming" or "performing provocative rituals" at "Islamic shrines."
Joseph is an integral figure within Judaism.
This was an outrageous decision by @UNESCO.
#TLDR: There's a reason it's called JUDEA and Samaria.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/10 🧵
Did you know the recent Israel-NGO framework story is being covered very differently depending on the outlet?
Most headlines focus on "restrictions" and "limits on criticism."
But what's the actual policy trying to achieve – and why do some groups comply while others don't? Let's break down the facts calmly.
2/10
In late 2025, Israel rolled out a new registration/vetting system for humanitarian orgs in Gaza & West Bank.
Goal (per official statements): Prevent wartime infiltration by militants into aid groups.
Most organizations signed on quickly. A smaller number raised concerns.
Question: What would you consider reasonable safeguards in active conflict zones?
3/10
Israel reports ~85%+ compliance rate – meaning the vast majority of NGOs met the criteria without issue.
The rules target specific red flags like:
- Documented support for armed groups
- Denial of documented atrocities (e.g., Oct 7)
- Active promotion of boycotts/lawfare against Israel
- Coordination with designated enemy orgs
Not blanket "no criticism" – but focused security checks.
1/ It’s awards season… and while Hollywood hands out trophies for acting, we’re honoring the people who pretended to do journalism. Presenting: Dishonest Reporter of the Year 2025.
Let's find out the winners 👇
2/ 🏆 Winner: The BBC
No outlet worked harder this year to prove that “publicly funded” doesn’t mean “publicly accountable.” Truly a masterclass in bias, blunders & backpedaling. honestreporting.com/exposed-leaked…
3/ Remember that Gaza documentary narrated by… a Hamas minister’s teenage son? The one whose mom got paid? Yeah — that really happened. BBC: Bold. Brave. Or just… 🤦♂️
1/ Since Oct. 7, 2023, major media outlets have repeatedly reported casualty figures from the Hamas-run Ministry of Health (MoH) in Gaza as if they were independently verified facts -- with little to no skepticism.
Let's break down the distorted narratives. 🧵
2/ Headlines citing MoH death tolls were widely amplified without attribution to Hamas, allowing a terrorist org’s figures to become the dominant narrative in global reporting.
3/ This has resulted in repeated blood libels in media coverage -- blaming Israel for high civilian death tolls without critically examining the reliability of the source data.
1/ 🌍Are Israeli women living in a dystopian reality where, year by year, they are being stripped of their most basic rights?
No, because the data and imagery used by @CNN to support that narrative distort reality and mislead audiences. 🧵
2/ 📸 The cover image features a “Handmaid’s Tale”-style protest from nearly three years ago against legal reforms -- not a current reflection of women’s rights in Israel. Context matters.
3/ 📊 CNN relies on the Women Peace & Security Index (WPS Index) without questioning its methodology. The index blends unrelated indicators (e.g., cellphone use, conflict exposure), not a pure gender-rights measure.
1/ The New York Times doesn’t use the phrase “ethnic cleansing” in its West Bank project.
It doesn't have to.
Selective imagery, distorted data & erased Palestinian terrorism lead to one conclusion: Israel is driving Palestinians off their land.
That claim is false. 🧵⬇️
2/ The article presents a stark moral narrative: “Armed Israeli settlers, often protected by soldiers, harass and attack Palestinian villagers daily, with the undisguised goal of driving them out.”
It describes masked extremists, rampant violence, state backing, and impunity.
It is frightening. It is also profoundly misleading.
3/ This framing rests on three pillars:
• Inflated & distorted violence statistics
• Visual implication without context
• The near-total erasure of Palestinian terrorism
Remove those pillars – and the narrative collapses.