Many of Judaism's most important sites are located here.
You might hear this site referred to as the Ibrahimi Mosque, but it's also called:
🔹 Cave of Machpelah
🔹 Cave of the Patriarchs
🔹 Tomb of the Patriarchs
Rachel's Tomb is a holy site for Jews, Christians and Muslims alike.
Even in the last 24 hours, when PIJ gunmen opened fire on Jewish worshipers at Joseph's Tomb, outlets outrageously either completely ignored or tried to hide the Jewish significance of the site.
🕍 Eshtemoa was described as a large Jewish village during the Roman & Byzantine period.
🕍 The Jericho synagogue has a mosaic floor which incorporates Jewish symbols such as the Ark of the Covenant, the Temple Menorah, a shofar and a lulav.
The two headlines at the bottom of this image are just two of the many many many stories which talk of Jews "storming" or "performing provocative rituals" at "Islamic shrines."
Joseph is an integral figure within Judaism.
This was an outrageous decision by @UNESCO.
#TLDR: There's a reason it's called JUDEA and Samaria.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
.@Independent "takes a closer look at the history of the Israeli Defence Forces (IDF) and why it is controversial."
So let's take a closer look at how The Independent evidently finds the concept of Jews defending themselves against terrorists to be "controversial." 🧵
@Independent No mention of how the newly formed IDF fought to defend the nascent Jewish state against 5 Arab armies intent on wiping it out.
Just a hyperbolic claim that "hundreds of thousands of people were driven...into refugee camps."
@Independent The IDF "claims" to be facing terrorist organizations?
Just who does @Independent believe threatens Israelis? Or did October 7 simply not happen?
Israel struck Iran preemptively.
Was it legal under international law? Here's what the rules actually say 👇
International law doesn’t ban preemptive strikes, but it does make them hard to justify.
They must be a response to a real, immediate threat, not a guess or grudge.
The standard? A 19th-century case called the Caroline Affair.
It's still the gold standard for when preemptive force is legal.
Modern military lawyers use it like a checklist, and it’s hard to pass.
How the media manufactured a “genocide.”
Zach Goldberg breaks down how the world’s most serious crime became a political weapon—and how media outlets helped it happen. 🧵
Mentions of “genocide” in relation to Israel have exploded—far beyond how the media treated actual, recognized genocides in history.
In The New York Times, coverage linking Israel and genocide was:
➤ 9x higher than for Rwanda
➤ 6x higher than for Darfur
Let that sink in.
“Why hasn’t there been a Palestinian state?”
Let’s talk about the peace deals that could’ve made it happen—and why they were rejected.👇
1️⃣ 1947 – The UN Partition Plan
Palestinians were offered statehood with the most fertile land.
Arab leaders said no. Then 6 Arab states attacked Israel.
Israel survived.
2️⃣ 1967 – Khartoum Summit & UN Resolution 242
After the Six-Day War, the UN proposed land-for-peace.
The Arab League responded:
“No peace. No recognition. No negotiations.”
End of conversation.
📰 No casualties. No bullet wounds. No injuries. No massacres.
But that's not how the media reported it...🧵
The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation's drone footage showed zero casualties, the IDF confirmed it, but media outlets still ran Hamas quotes as fact.
Why the influx of disinformation? Because Hamas is desperate to sabotage an aid system that bypasses its control, so it invented atrocities, and the media helped legitimize them.