Lee Kuan Yew talks at great length throughout his memoirs on building Singapore about trees specifically, trees *as such*, being harbingers and indicators and inspirers of great things: https://t.co/hhgMmvhDsv
This by far not the only mention of trees, btw.
Go read it yourself if you don't believe me.
Lee Kuan Yew straight up keeps talking about the importance of trees all throughout the book.
It's a topic which he feels compelled to revisit, sometimes seemingly arbitrarily.
I think part of LKY's attention to trees—and his attention to matters of growth or nutrients and life-forms, or metaphors invoking them—is that the business and duty of proper governance is very much like that of gardener's.
Greater yields and beautiful flowers go hand in hand.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Have you ever been in a hotel room, or maybe seen one one in media. Have you taken your time to ponder upon the layout of the furniture, their functions, historical reasoning and positioning? The bed is of course the essential part, but what else is there? Bedside tables... and..
...Cuck chairs. Now, before you dismiss this as a simple joke of the present - a mere passing of the online zeitgeist, I invite you to ponder - what is the true meaning of these additional furniture pieces?
The pyramid on the left doesn't exist - only nursing homes and graveyards could be shaped that way, but plenty of nations approximate it under ~40.
The one on the right *does* exist, from schools and campuses to whole societies.
For example, here is the population pyramid of Japan in 2010...vs 1940:
You can see the impact of wars in the Japanese male population in the earlier part of the their 20th ca. but they were still growing...in the 21st century, they get the downward taper: i.e. now they're dying
The idea of cultural “resilience” or “adaptivity” despite changing demographics is isomorphic to raising another person’s children, when one could have had one’s own. It’s true that the Lingua Anglica is spoken all over the world, but cold is the cuckoo’s comfort.
Cosmopolitan elites who work with their minds (if at all), often traveling far from home either physically or mentally, discount ideas of nationalism or attachments to land, because their own personal tastes and advantageous modes are xenophilic, abstruse, and diffuse.
But they are a distinct, usually unnecessary minority, there’s no reason they should be tolerated in their instigating, neglecting, or indulging the wars & hostilities, the suffering & deprivations, the inequities & arbitrages which make up their interactions with everyone else.
The main problem I have with them is it’s not even like gays or whatever where their sexual nature can, like regular people, just not be an issue because it doesn’t come up.
With these people it’s a visible thing and we’re asked to participate by playing along.
What if I said the way you HAD to address me, so I could feel safe and fully be my True Self ®, was with a Roman-style Nazi salute and calling me “Obergruppenführer”?
What would be the basis for refusing to do that?
What if I also said the only way for me to really being who I am without shame—was to be able to wear a snappy feldgrau Waffen SS uniform—and wear my preferred costume *anywhere* that I wanted?
To understand the secularized upper-caste anti-Hindu Liberal Anglophone elites who ran India pre-Modi, know that they want desperately to be the inheritors of White Boomers who were young in the 1960s and import that mindset into India.
I know most of my followers interested in politics aren’t especially so re: India, and that’s fine, but the contours of the American relationship to its elite/ruling class parallel those of Indians contra the nepotistic political party which controlled them for *70 years*.
Apart from entertainment media like that show, headlines from Anglophone *news* media are the US State reaction to the little brother types having lost—aimed at the young diaspora and the business class in India, to goad and chide them into working against Hindu Nationalism.
Notice that all of the parents bringing their children to these events are women, and generally college educated white liberal women. You don’t see: black moms, Asian parents, big Latino families, or white dads.
It’s always overwhelmingly white, college educated moms. Curious.
I think these homosexual black male performers are perceived by the white heterosexual women who are mothers as basically ridiculous creatures, something akin to a talking animal or elfin fairy, so their sexual gyrations are de-fanged and harmless, like a dog humping a chair.
The babies and very young kids don’t (consciously) pick up on much else, either. It’s obviously (to us) bad for them, but it’s not an immediate effect. It’s Mommy feeling good about herself/using the happy voice and colorful costumes. It’s cheap Disneyworld for them.