Today in AD 1209 the army of the Albigensian Crusade massacred the inhabitants of the town of Beziers.
It was a day of butchery and bloodshed.
On the 21st of July the army, led by the Papal legate, the Abbot of Citeaux, Arnaud Amalric, reached the town of Beziers.
Not many townsfolk has decided to leave and the Bishop of Beziers attempted to negotiate. He was given a list of 222 of Cathars & Waldensians to hand over.
However, these people were too influential in the town and it was not possible to simply hand them over to the besieging crusaders.
At this point the Bishop asked the Catholic townsfolk to save themselves and leave but they refused.
On the morning on the 22nd, a sortie came out from the town which was quickly attacked by mercenaries among the crusaders, driving it back inside the town, along with some of the mercenaries who fought for control of the gate.
When the main army saw this they decided to attack.
These mercenaries, called routiers, rampaged through the streets, killing indiscriminately and plundering as they went. The crusading knights did nothing to stop them except to intervene to appropriate the plunder. The angry routiers decided to burn the town in response.
In Caesarius of Heisterbach’s account of the sack, he recalls a soldier asking the abbot Amalric:
‘Sir, what shall we do, for we cannot distinguish between the faithful and the heretics.’
To which he infamously replied;
‘Kill them all for the Lord knoweth them that are His.’
And so, according the Amalric’s own likely inflated account, 20,000 townsfolk are said to have been massacred.
In the aftermath of this brutality, many nearby towns and castles surrendered quickly to the crusade in hopes of avoiding the fate of Beziers.
The Albigensian Crusade lasted ten years and is thought to have caused the deaths of between 200,000 to a million people.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The First Crusade is famous the world over for its epic journey from France to Jerusalem!
But less well known is the simultaneous campaign of the east Roman generals sent to reconquer Western Asia Minor and clear out the Turks!
[Thread]🧵
The First Crusade was prompted by the collapse of stability in Anatolia following the battle of Manzikert, the deaths of the Turkic leaders who were friendly with the Roman Emperor Alexios Komnenos, and the subsequent coup attempt against him.
When this instability of Anatolia was combined with the increased interest in pilgrimage to Jerusalem and related interest in the mistreatment of pilgrims, western powers began paying very close attention to the situation and many western lords enthusiastically accepted the call of Pope Urban II in 1095 to journey east to aid the plight of eastern Christendom and the empire!
In the 5th century AD, the Roman Empire abandoned the Romans of Britain to an age of darkness.
Alone and unprotected, Brittannia was assailed by Germanic tribes who came first as mercenaries, and then to conquer!
This is the 𝐀𝐃𝐕𝐄𝐍𝐓𝐔𝐒 𝐒𝐀𝐗𝐎𝐍𝐔𝐌
[Thread]🧵
Barbarian tribes had threatened the Roman state even before the days of the empire, but from the late 3rd and 4th centuries AD, Saxon raiders began to attack Brittannia to the point where new fortifications were needed.
The Saxon Shore was created to ward off these raids, a series of forts along the coast of England.
In the early 8th century the fate of the world hung in the balance when a series of defeats tested the might of the Umayyad Caliphate!
From Spain to China the diabolical onslaught of Jihad was halted and pushed back.
[Thread]🧵
• Jihad •
After the death of Muhammad, his followers invaded the Roman Empire and Persia.
Both empires suffered devastating defeats at the battles of Yarmouk and al-Qadisiyyah, respectively.
The Muslims captured the Levant from the Romans and Iraq from the Persians before effectively destroying the remnants of the Persian army at Nahavand in 642.
While the Persian state suffered total collapse, the Roman emperor Heraclius pulled back his forces back behind the Taurus mountains to fight another day.
The Fourth Crusade was a disaster not only for the eastern Roman Empire but for all of Christendom.
The new Latin Empire diverted manpower and funding desperately needed by the faltering Kingdom of Jerusalem.
This is a thread on the disastrous fallout of 1204.
[Thread]🧵
The original plan for the Fourth Crusade was to sail to Egypt to deal a critical blow to the Fatimids before marching on Egypt.
Poor planning meant that the crusade was diverted to sack the Catholic city of Zara and then Constantinople in order to secure the funds for their Venetian transport bill.
It has been estimated that only 10% of the crusader force that set out from Italy made it to the Holy Land.
Of the 96 named individuals in Villehardouin’s account, only 26 made it to the Holy Land.
Figures like Enguerrand III, Lord of Coucy, Simon de Montfort, 5th Earl of Leicester and Guy of Vaux-de-Cernay all refused to go to Constantinople.
Naturally such a small force achieved very little.
An exasperated crusader army sat outside Constantinople, baying for blood and gold, ready to sack the city.
What followed was one of the most tragic incidents in the history of the world.
[𝐌𝐞𝐠𝐚 𝐓𝐡𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐝]🧵
In decades prior, Western nations had grown increasingly frustrated with their perceived duplicity of the east Roman Empire, due to the biased accounts of past crusaders looking for someone to blame for their failed expeditions, and the idiotic actions of the emperor Isaac Angelos during the Third Crusade.
They lost respect for the empire’s dwindling power amid the misrule of the usurper emperors after the death of the capable & conciliatory Manuel I who launched multiple expeditions to aid the Kingdom of Jerusalem in attacking Fatimid Egypt.
This fanned the flames of intolerance of the cultural & religious differences between East & West and they began to take out their frustration by demanding the Empire atone for its part in failing to aide the crusaders in retaining & retaking Jerusalem after its conquest by Saladin
By far, one of the most underrated generals of the 12th century was Andronikos Kontostephanos!
A great warrior who led campaigns against the Egyptians, Hungarians and Venetians but whose life ended in tragedy.
[Thread] 🧵
Born in 1122 in Constantinople to Stephanos Kontostephanos and Anna Komnene, the daughter of the emperor John Komnenos, Andronikos was destined for a life of imperial service as the nephew of the reigning Roman Emperor Manuel!
At this time the empire was on stronger footing than in the latter half of the preceding century following the First Crusade but now had to find its way in a world where hostility and alliances were to be found with kingdoms on all of its borders.
The first mention of Andronikos Kontostephanos in the annals of history is tinged with tragedy.
In 1148 his father Stephanos was leading an expedition to drive the Sicilian Normans out of Corfu. During an assault he was struck by debris upon the shattering of a siege ladder.
As he lay dying, he summoned his youngest son Andronikos, who at the time was the leader of the Varangians, and exhorted him with ‘expressions of a spirit manly and wholly warlike and patriotic.’