Teri Kanefield Profile picture
Jul 22 17 tweets 4 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
He is wrong. In this instance, he is talking off the top of his head. He didn't look closely.

Why do people follow me just to argue with me?

Read what I wrote and use your own brains.

You all have your own brains, right?

Democracy requires an electorate that can THINK.

1/
Fox viewers believe whatever they are told when they turn on their televisions. Don't be like that.

Holder offered an opinion. He offered no facts to back up what he said.

I offer facts. Lots of them.

Try this. It will not hurt you. Read this page:

2/terikanefield.com/all-new-doj-in…
In 2021 and 2022 when I said, "I see what the DOJ is doing and Trump will be indicted."

You all mocked me and called me an optimist.

Nope. I am NOT an optimist. I looked at the facts and saw what was happening.

Want proof that I am not an optimist?

Here is proof. . .

3/
I am starting to believe that democracy will not work.

Democracy requires an educated electorate. Democracy requires people able to think for themselves.

Plato didn't think democracy would work because he didn't think people lacked the capacity to think about policy issues.

4/
What I see on Twitter is tens of thousands of people who don't want to read or think.

They want to turn on the television and say, "Eric Holder said this so it must be true."

You laugh at the people who turn on Fox and believe whatever they are told.

5/
Yes, I am having a meltdown. You can watch me meltdown in real time.

I had a person on Twitter yesterday absolutely refuse to read the page I gave him. He just refused. And kept telling me I was wrong.

6/
In 2021 and 2022 when Twitter was acting like a mob with pitchforks demanding that Merrick Garland be fired, I wondered what you all would say.

Do you want to see the screenshots of famous people saying Trump would NEVER be indicted because Garland wasn't up to the task?

7/
I saved them.

I wondered what those same people would say when in fact, under Garland's watch, Trump would be indicted.

Do they say, "Well looks like we were wrong?"

Nope. They say, "We weren't wrong. Garland did nothing for a year."

8/
There are facts proving them wrong, but they don't see the facts.

Do you want to know why they don't see them?

Because we are in an information disruption. There is too much irrelevant information and not enough facts.

9/
We are under an avalanche of opinions, speculation, talking heads on cable shooting the breeze, conspiracy theories, and conjecture.

The facts get lost.

In the old days, people read their newspaper once or maybe twice each day.

10/
They were presented facts in the evening news.

But you know what? Facts are boring. (Walter Cronkite was boring.)

In this click-driven world, news has become entertainment.

Facts are not entertaining. So instead of being given facts about what the DOJ was doing. . .

11/
. . . they were given opinions.

But nobody remembers anymore what those opinions were in 2021.

I remember because I had a private argument with someone with a big account here who you all know.

12/
This is a person who regularly appears on TV.

This person was furious at Merrick Garland for not "reassuring the public" that in fact he was investigating Trump.

I showed this person what Garland had said and the DOJ rules for why Garland could not offer that reassurance.

13/
We were not friends after that :)

People were mad at Garland because of the way. he went about the investigation.

They wanted him to break a few rules. They wanted him to act like a tough guy.

Why?

My opinion: Because Trump taught everyone to like tough guys.

14/
Merrick Garland did it his way. He did it the rule-of-law way.

Instead of saying, "Well I guess Teri was right. Garland was going to get here after all" they make up a stupid theory that an investigation this complex could have been done in half the time.

15/
Can democracy survive in America?

I have my doubts.

If anyone wants to read and think, go to my blog, find the tab that says "criminal investigations" and start reading.

Read it all and tell me where I was wrong.

If you have questions, ask them on my blog.

16/
This platform is going down the tubes and is a big part of the problem.

Whenever I come back here I lose any hope that democracy can survive.

You can find me with the smart people on Mastodon.

And now I will get my morning coffee.

17/

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Teri Kanefield

Teri Kanefield Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Teri_Kanefield

Jul 22
Confirmation is a powerful drug. If you spent two years insisting

🔹Garland is a wimp and will never indict Trump
🔹Garland, therefore, needs to be fired,

what do you do when the Garland DOJ indicts?

Admit you were wrong?
Or find a way to say you were right all along?
You come up with a new theory, which ignores the fact that Garland appointed Smith when Trump announced his candidacy (because, rules)

You make up a new narrative: Smith got things rolling!
(in fact, the pace didn't change)

Garland should have done it sooner!
Or this one "Garland started with the overt crimes and moved to the less overt ones. But he did it wrong! He should have gone straight for Trump We would get there sooner!"

Riight. And then what?

Instead of de-politicizing the DOJ and returning to rule of law, the DOJ . . .
Read 4 tweets
Jul 12
Yes. Yes. Sort of.

In the next tweet, I will attach screenshots from the Meta company explaining the plan . . .

1/
Activity Pub is the protocol that Mastodon uses (and word press can use) and soon Tumblr (and others).

Notice 'new types of connections that are simply not possible on most social apps today.'

2/
What that means for me (I have my own Mastodon server) is that once this happens, and if you have a Threads account, you and I can "follow" each other across platforms.

This is known as "open social networking protocol."

The analogy usually given is email. . .

3/
Read 9 tweets
Jul 7
Well, a foothold with disaffected Twitter users.

Bluesky, like Post and a few others, tried to replace Twitter by siphoning off Twitter users.

I don't think you can achieve scale or network effect by siphoning users from one site to another.

The way to achieve scale. . .
or the network effect Twitter achieved is either organically, as Twitter did it, which is slow growth, or by doing with Threads did: Tapping into a base of billions of users and making it super easy (download an app and press a few buttons).

Think of it. Billions.
And they're attracting people with celebrities.

Former Twitter users: Threads sucks. You can't switch to a reverse-chrono non-algorithmic feed of accounts you follow. There are no lists.

Instagram user: Cool! I can see what my favorite athletes are saying!

Also . . .
Read 5 tweets
Jul 6
Fani Willis said that indictments for the attempts to overturn the election in Georgia will come between July 11 and September 1.

If you want to get caught up in 13 minutes, we did another video:


The information is also on my blog . . .

1/
The reason these videos are happening is because my IT staff (my husband) doing all the work.

I just talk. (I don't even look at the final product! I get too picky and want to edit.)

I said, "NO I'm a writer." He said, "You can also talk and some people prefer to listen."

2/
The info is also here:



3/terikanefield.com/georgia-invest…
Read 4 tweets
Jul 4
I am offering this Washington Post article free through my subscription:


It's a topic important to me because I have seen the damage: rage baiting, which is made possible by algorithms that incentivize rage-generating content.wapo.st/46yByw2
My fear for Twitter under Musk was this:
He wouldn't disrupt the essential functions, so users would simply ignore the ugly on the periphery.

Meanwhile, Twitter would turn into an effective right-wing propaganda machine.

I didn't worry about the savvy Twitter users . . .
. . . who do not let themselves be baited by the rage-merchants and who understand how to evaluate sources.

I worried about the people here to exchange recipes and pet pics who would be infected by the propaganda/ disinformation without knowing it . . .
Read 13 tweets
Jun 18
I have this weekend's blog post ready:

Trump’s Second Indictment, Part III: Trump confessed to the crime. Now let’s bust a few myths.

terikanefield.com/trumps-second-…
The best way to keep in touch while social media is in transit is to subscribe to my always free once-weekly blog post: eepurl.com/h4xCMr

Here is how I am currently using social media: I post my thoughts and ideas on Mastodon throughout the week . . .
. . . occasionally if I put time into a thread, I will repost a link here. I get feedback and ideas from the conversation in my feed. (Okay, basically I test out my ideas. If I am wrong about something, someone will always be kind enough to tell me 😅)

Then on Saturday. . .
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(