Dennis Noel Kavanagh Profile picture
Jul 23 12 tweets 3 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
1/ Welcome to the second dark age. The second counter enlightenment

The age of unreason. The age that says feelings are more important than evidence, the age that reunifies state and public belief

Welcome to the great intellectual recession. A dark age so dark the lights go out
2/ How did you get here? Well. In simple terms, you arrive at this dark, lonely isle via two things. Feelings and pictures.

You see. The old enlightenment was but on the opposite of pictures and feelings. It was built on words and reason. That's why all your institutions fail
3/ That's why they are "captured" or have otherwise capitulated to the post modern malignity de jour whether it's critical race theory, gender, whatever.

The point is those old bulwarks. Those great phalanxes of rights and rationality. They spoke words and reason.
4/ Around the mid 1980s feelings became fashionable. Theraputic public discourse from Oprah to everyone having a therapist and that not being an issue assuaged and blunted moral consequence. No one was feckless, they were sex addicts. No one a drunk, they had an illness. Etc.
5/ The primacy of feelings emerged as an explanation for everything. "I'm a trans woman because I FEEL like a woman". You can't use the wrong pronouns, how would the recipient "feel". You want to look for the real enlightenment. Look at this.

6/ I'm doomed to think "I don't care" is the most revolutionary statement a man or woman can make now. For the obligation to care. The primacy of feelings. The safe spaces. The trigger warnings. The specious claims to feel "unsafe" because a lesbian says she is a lesbian...
7/ Not caring is now a revolutionary act. And so to aesthetics.

The modern human child has consumed 100 times more more images than their grandparents. They endlessly are told to curate online avatars and selfies and Instagrams. Pictures have defeated the words.
8/ Don't believe me? Tell me why women's sports pictures like this cut through harder than forgotten oubliette women in prisons. Tell me why the breastfeeding AGP picture cuts through harder than him typing this was the case. Face it. You're in an aesthetic revolution. Image
9/ Now, we can combat a word of aesthetics and anime avatars and curated appearance and memes hitting harder than words with the grotesque unfairness visited by gender.

But we must recognise that's what we're doing.
10/ And if we're doing so. Or hitting back by saying "I don't care" what we're doing is recognising the nature of the beast.

This is the shadow of an old dead religion. These are the appetites of such. This is unreason. This is the second dark age.
11/ So we will continue to meet and fight this old beast. But let's be clear. This is a force from long ago, a thing that has holy castes, monks with it's asexuals, heresy and witchtrials with it's terf cancelling, catechisms and mantras.

This is a very, very old friend.
12/ And a very, very old enemy. Much that it fights the enlightenment. It comes from a time before it. It is the state of nature at war. It is the atavism of chaos. "Queer theory" breaks down boundaries and ushers in the law of the jungle.

But only predators prosper in nature.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dennis Noel Kavanagh

Dennis Noel Kavanagh Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Jebadoo2

Jul 11
1/ I want to pay tribute tonight to Nancy Kelley, outgoing CEO of Stonewall for being our ever stalwart general fighting for the reality of sex and homosexual rights against the madness of gender. She could have given in, but she always did the difficult thing, the right thing.
2/ NK took over Stonewall at a time of flux. Gay marriage was achieved. The dreadful shadow of AIDS was now a critical condition, not a death sentence. We had service in the military, we had equal consent. The Gay rights movement faced an existential choice, and Ruth chose trans

3/ Incoming Stonewall chief NK noticed the tumult and aggravation regarding trans politics. She immediately ceased all Stonewall lobbying in this area and refocused the charity on two matters. Gay rights abroad and healing after AIDS.
Read 22 tweets
Jul 9
1/ The @metpoliceuk and @MayorofLondon appear unwilling to take open threats of violence against women and girls seriously. This is not good enough. I am now aware of a parlous and legally incoherent from an acting sergeant at the met in response to a wholly justified complaint.
2/ For context. This offender is subject to license and must thus be of "good behaviour". The words spoken at this public rally plainly constitute the section 44 offence of encouraging offending in the 2007 act. The offence contemplated is serious

legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2007/27/…
3/ The Mayor and Met have strategies to deal with violence against women and girls. The overwhelming majority of those referred to (derogatorily) as "terfs" are women and girls. This is a serious CJS concern. The response from the met does not appear to reflect that.
Read 15 tweets
Jul 6
1/ Alright, I've read the judgment, so here's a rough and ready explainer. Mermaids lose (lol) the case on standing. Standing is a legal term that means you have to be affected by a decision to challenge it. So I can sue my local council, but not one hundreds of miles away.
2/ The question of standing is further qualified by the Charities Act 2011 which requires consideration of two further points. To establish standing you have to have a "legal right" affected, and it must be affected by *the decision to register*
3/ Mermaids fail on all counts here. They have no legal right to get funding without criticism of that find the tribunal and they have no legal right to push child mutilation without criticism. Case of Miller gets a mention here showing how important Harry's victory was.
Read 11 tweets
Jul 5
1/ Tomorrow is the day of reckoning in LGB Alliance v Mermaids with judgment being handed down at 10 AM. My view is that if the law is applied to the facts Mermaids should comprehensively lose on all points, but litigation is always a risk so I want to look the contrary position

2/ First things first, if you need an excellent summary of the legal background to the case, Barbara Rich (an expert in this field) has it covered here with an explainer on the two key issues of (i) standing and (ii) public benefit points.

3/ For a deep dive into the law and relevant facts, I wrote a letter to the Good Laugh Project in 2021 objecting to this spiteful action, (one described on record by a trans identifying male campaigner as an effort to "run them ragged").

grahamlinehan.substack.com/p/dennis-kavan…
Read 13 tweets
Jul 3
1/ Overplaying their hand as always. The personal is now the political. The body of a "trans woman" has lost the shroud of mystery. The question is brute forced

Is this a paraphilic male using an baby as an erotic prop, or will you accept this a the new norm because TWAW?
2/ Aesthetics matter more than words and certainly more than ethics these days. This one image is now viral and provoking a visceral and instinctual level of revulsion across the planet. Images do these days. That's why women's sports cut through but women's prison don't.
3/ What an imagine it is. The now recognisable AutoGynoSmile, that smirk that taunts the viewer, "look what I'm getting away with, look what I can get away with. Look at the recognisably male contours of my face. My jaw. Look what I can do. I call myself mother.........
Read 12 tweets
Jun 30
1/ So called heterosexual here (who once famously said he was going to slide into a trans identifying male's DMs) on behalf of the so called good law project, (better known as the good laugh project) news on behalf of his pals at a scandal ridden child sex change charity
2/ Heterosexuals like Joylon and Susie Green (now hastily retired) at Mermaids believe they have a divine right to tell gay men and lesbians what we can and can't think and what charities we can and can't have. Pair of ill disciplined homophobes when you consider it.
3/ Susie's contempt of court discipline is such that she had to hastily remove a video calling LGB Alliance a "hate group" during the damned tribunal. A rich claim given her her charity retained a paedophile advocate as a trustee and is under a safeguarding investigation
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(