Stephan Jensen Profile picture
Jul 23 19 tweets 7 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
🇦🇫 THREAD:
I keep hearing nonsense about the Afghan forces not being willing to fight.

It's a disgusting lie.

We took out almost all our troops in 2014 - since then the Afghans fought like hell.

But in 2021, we left them without ammunition, food, water, and air support.

1/🧵 Image
People keep forgetting that the West pulled out almost all of its troops in 2013-14. NOT in 2021.

And after that, the Afghans did almost all the fighting.

The remaining Western presence was mainly advisors, logistics, and air support.

2/🧵 Image
From 2014-2021, the War in Afghanistan was fought with Western money, supplies, and air support - but with Afghan blood, sweat, and tears.

The Afghan sacrifices were staggering.

During that period, 127 coalition troops lost their lives - compared to 50.000 Afghan troops.

3/🧵 Image
The fact that the Afghans relied on the West for critical support (much of it provided by private contractors) was a choice made *for* Afghanistan by their (former) allies, primarily the US.

The Afghan military was *set up* to be integrated with and supported by the West.

4/🧵 Image
But why?

In the early 2010s, the main US priority was to get its forces out of Afghanistan as soon as possible - especially out of combat.

The quickest way to do that was to build the Afghan fighting units ASAP, but leave the support capabilities for later.

5/🧵 Image
It worked. With Western support, the Afghan forces took over after 2014.

That doesn't mean it was perfect, far from it.

But it enabled the West to withdraw the vast majority of its forces and mostly leave the War to the Afghans.

And the Taliban gains were negligible

6/🧵 Image
Beyond the critical material support for the Afghan forces, *political* support for the Afghan government also remained important.

The sense, psychologically, that the West was backing the Afghan Republic was an important source of reassurance - also for its military.

7/🧵 Image
The Afghan military still depended on Western enablers after 2014 - particularly air support and logistics.

But our involvement radically dropped after 2014, and was mostly "arm's length" from then onwards.

Far less money was spent, and Western casualties were negligble

8/🧵 Image
Longer term, however, little attention was paid to building Afghan enabling capabilities. Their forces kept being reliant on Western logistics and air support.

To some extent, that wasn't a problem. After 2014 Western involvement was low and sustainable.

9/🧵 Image
Some (rightly it turned out) worried about the sustainability of explicitly setting up the Afghan forces to depend on Western support.

"Not to worry," the US Government said, "we will never, ever, ever, take away the things you need to fight"

10/🧵 Image
Nevertheless, a more widespread basic understanding of the completely changed nature of the US role in Afghanistan was casualties of the US presidential elections in 2015 and 19.

As were the US promises of sustained support for their ally Afghanistan.

11/🧵 Image
In blatant defiance of reality, both Trump and Biden promised to "end the war" - a war no longer fought by the US and NATO but by the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan.

But the Afghans still relied on the support they had been promised by the US to continue doing so.

12/🧵 Image
The result of that domestic political theatre in the United States was disastrous for Afghanistan.

It was the reason both for Trump doing the Doha deal with the Taliban without the Afghan government involved, and Biden then executing that deal in the worst possible way.

13/🧵 Image
The Doha deal and the withdrawal struck two deadly blows to the Afghan forces:

1. The critical support capabilities that the Afghan military needed to keep fighting were taken away

2. US political support for the Afghan Republic was seen to be shifted to the Taliban.

14/🧵 Image
This is really important to understand, and contrary to both Trump and Biden's speeches:

The withdrawal in 2020-21 was not really about bringing home Western troops...

...it was about removing Western support for Afghan troops, who had already been fighting for 7 years.

15/🧵 Image
Critically, it's the removal of Western support -not the removal of Western combat troops- that caused the Afghan Republic to collapse and the Taliban to return to power

Western combat troops had already left *seven years earlier*.

16/🧵 Image
Different leaders in Kabul might still have saved the situation. We don't know.

But pulling the plug on their allies was a US decision - one they did not need to make.

And it's a decision that will come back to bite us.

But most of all, it is the Afghans that suffer.

🧵Fin Image
Here's another thread covering some other aspects of the same story:
Another thread related to this, going more into detail on the decision to unnecessarily restrict air support.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Stephan Jensen

Stephan Jensen Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @StephanAJensen

Jul 17
THREAD:

#OTD Exactly 50 years ago, Mohammed Daoud ousted his cousin King Zahir Shah, took power in Afghanistan, and declared it a Republic - first opening the door to more than 40 years of violence and war in Afghanistan.

Nevertheless, his legacy remains a complex one.

1/🧵 Image
To be clear, the War in Afghanistan did not start with Daoud's reign as president - but with the end of it.

He was killed in 1978 with his whole family when Soviet-backed Afghan communists mounted a coup of their own.

But the seeds for that too were sown by Daoud himself.

2/🧵 Image
1973 was not the first time Daoud held power in Afghanistan. From 1953 to 1963, he had been prime minister under King Zahir Shah.

"The decade of Daoud" as it has later been called, was a period of rapid economic development, as well as social progress. For good reasons.

3/🧵 Image
Read 18 tweets
Jun 30
🇦🇫THREAD:

There was no reason why the Taliban should have won in 2021.

Much has been said about the chaotic evacuation from Afghanistan in 2021, and how it might have been done differently.

The far more important point is how we could have avoided an evacuation at all.

1/🧵
The idea that a Taliban victory was unavoidable and just a matter of time is total nonsense.

The Afghan Republic faced many challenges, especially corruption and disunity. And many big mistakes had been made over 20 years.

But none of that made defeat inevitable.

2/🧵
Even after:

- The disastrous Doha agreement in 2020
- The losses of districts in early summer 2021
- The severe supply shortages across the Afghan forces
- The US leaving Bagram airbase

..the Taliban offensive could still have been stopped and the Afghan Republic saved.

3/🧵
Read 16 tweets
Jun 27
Once you scratch the surface of the Taliban's propaganda, there is nothing at all "traditional" or "national" about their movement.

The Taliban is an utterly modern movement, mostly based on 20th-century political ideas and foreign religious teachings.

1/11
The political idea that a group of mullahs should control government has no traditional precedent in Afghanistan - or anywhere in the Islamic world.

It is a riff on radical Islamism. a 20th-century *political* ideology brought to Afghanistan by academics in the 1960s.

2/11
Democracy, even in its modern form, has far deeper roots in Afghanistan than the Taliban's theocratic system: a form of government introduced for the first time ever in the 1990s.

The political "traditions" the Taliban claim to represent are barely two decades old.

3/11
Read 11 tweets
Jun 13
🇦🇫 THREAD:
Every single Afghan frontline soldier or officer I have spoken to has told me they were desperately short of ammunition, fuel, water, food, and other supplies during the decisive fighting in 2021.
Why? Was choking off the Afghan forces also part of the Doha deal?
1/🧵 Image
At the point when the Afghan Republican defence forces started collapse in July-Aug 2021, many units had been fighting for weeks or months without meaningful resupply.
They were not just short of ammunition, but forces to eat expired field rations and drink unsanitary water.
2/🧵 Image
There were many reasons why logistics got difficult, but blaming it all on corruption is a cop-out.
The major problems began as a result of the Doha deal, which massively restricted Afghan forces' offensive operations, making it easy for the Taliban to cut off supply lines.
3/🧵 Image
Read 12 tweets
Mar 6
THREAD:
No conflict has mattered more for world history at the turn of millennium than the war in Afghanistan.
Almost invisibly, but in plain sight, the 43-year War in Afghanistan has been the pivot around which the most critical events of recent history have turned.
1/🧵
Western cynics say "Why does this faraway country Afghanistan matter to us at all?"
The truth is, it's almost impossible to explain, but whatever has happened in Afghanistan since it's war broke out in 1978 has had seismic consequences for the rest of the world. 2/🧵
The fall of the Soviet Union had many causes - but its intervention in the War in Afghanistan acted as an accelerator to processes which might otherwise have ended differently.
The consequence was a total re-shaping of the global order at the end of the 20th century.
3/🧵
Read 19 tweets
Dec 12, 2022
🇦🇫THREAD:
Most people today take it for granted that the war in Afghanistan began in 2001.
But that's complete nonsense.
By 2001 the war in Afghanistan had already been raging for 23 years, and caused the country to be utterly transformed by violence.
1/🧵
Many commentators also un-troubledly assume that the Taliban were in complete control of Afghanistan in 2001.
By extension, they also assume that the Taliban had won Afghanistan's civil war in the 1990s and brought peace to the country.
Both assumptions are wrong.
2/🧵
In fact, one of the last books to be published in English about Afghanistan *before* 9/11 - in August 2001 - was called "Afghanistan's Endless War."
In early 2001 Afghanistan was both already at war and still at war - and had been so for a long time.
3/🧵
uwapress.uw.edu/book/978029598…
Read 25 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(