🧵1/
It's hard to grasp Nietzschean Master morality. In our sickly guilt-poisoned era the instinctual values of healthy ubermenchean man are almost entirely Alien
However, shockingly, America has produced a perfect artifact of healthy noble natural values:
The Disney Princess.
2/
The Disney Princess is the perfect archetype of easy natural inherent nobility and morality.
She is an artifact of inborn virtue, a born noble, irrespective of parentage.
With the naive careless values that come from an easy mastery of her domain
3/ From this metaphysical nobility (occasionally paired with political nobility) she is reduced to the lowest station, a servant, a wanderer, a cripple, an enlistee
Only for her innate nobility to reveal itself and for her to win her rightful station and an apex man with it
4/
It is basically the female equivalent of Conan the Barbarian
An idealized parable and fantasy of entering the world and after setbacks achieving social, political, and sexual preeminence through innate greatness and wilful self-assertion.
5/ Notably, the values and morality of the Princess are always purely expressions of her will and instinct.
She is a friend to the animals not due to any axiom, but from her innate instinct to nurture, she is a bookworm not from disciplined instruction but from innate curiosity
6/
The Disney Princess is simply the perfect avatar of her world and people, but she has one tragic fatal, all too perfectly Nietzschean weakness...
She is Niave
7/
like the natural Chads and Stacies of Nietzsche's pagan world, The Disney Princess is un-contemplative of motive and values.
She judges things by their obvious pleasantness and quality, the slow decades-long embittering of her lessers is beyond her comprehension.
8/
The Princess's most dangerous foe, is invariably an old, ugly, hook-nosed, unrelated (though some pretend), woman, who has years of neuroses and delusion built up, with attendant self-justification... and appears in the guise of a wise friend.
What did Walt mean by this?
9/
These Villainesses either directly seek to poison the princess, or indirectly through poisonous advice and arrangements...
Like Nietzsche warns, these spiritual slaves seek to infect the princess with their values. Either to exploit her or destroy her.
.
(not her mother)
10/
Of course, this is an exact parallel with the most dangerous threat a beautiful young woman faced in the ancestral environment: The older Unrelated tribeswoman.
11/ Men either wanted to win her or carry favor in case her husband died. But older women saw only a rival who could displace them and their kin, and being more established had better gossip networks to try and destroy her, and more influence to lead her astray.
12/
One bad piece of advice could lead her to violate a sacred rule or falsely confirm an infidelity rumor planted by the crones.
Each of which could end in death.
13/
Of course, as justice has been formalized these immediate lethal consequences have faded away, and gossip lost much of its potency... there may not have been a queen of Europe who wasn't stalked by some rumor her thousands of rivals begat.
14/
But from this, a new danger emerged, the threat of poisoned advice... toxic values, as poisonous or worse than the immediate rumor or slipped serum... toxic words that could wipe out an entire bloodline
15/
Of course Walt was just harkening back to older stories...
Older bitter ugly unrelated women and effeminate men poisoning young girls with values and ideas meant to destroy them and their bloodline has no relevance to modern naive young American women, none at all...
16/
As is the Disney princess has somehow survived into the 21st century an almost perfect archetype of healthy primal master morality, the Nietzschean ideal
Fit to raise a generation of Chadettes, and innoculate them against the threats of slave morality.
17/
So ya, I'm going to have to apologize to some Disney-loving relatives for decades of eye rolls...
Walt truly was one of the great American geniuses.
P.S. I write things!
Almost every modern story is a Superhero story. and I'm not talking Marvel films.
"action" sequences with no danger, fights with no blood, heroes who're never truly hurt
🧵🌶️ The Class Enemies of Liberty🌶️🧵 1/ (in memory of Tucker)
We have gone from the fastest-growing era of history to one of the slowest, wages have stagnated for 50 years, and kids will have worse standards of living than their parents.
This is not an accident.
2/ History never changed faster than ~1890-1950. Horses were replaced by cars, gaslight by electric, flight went from a hopeless dream to a banality, Household labour requirements reduced 80+%... and a near-infinite energy source was invented.
3/
Meanwhile the past 50 years have given us the Obesity epidemic, 2000 per month studio apartments, fentanyl, and Social Media.
“We wanted flying cars, instead we got 140 characters.” – Peter Thiel
There are still conservatives, and some NYT progressives who fear/dream that China's authoritarianism is going to outcompete the west economically and bring in a century of Centralized control
This isn't going to happen. China is all but collapsing
2/ Thanks to the one-child policy China has amongst the worst demographics of any country in the world.
According to official numbers China's population is on track to decline from 1.4 billion to 700 million by century's end, Halving...
3/
But experts who track leaks and other metrics think it is even worse than the CCP's official numbers suggest. They suspect Chinese population growth is already negative and could drop below 1 billion as early as 2050.
Whenever I discuss history its shocking how much ignorance I encounter from even trained historians about the level of poverty in the past
Contrary to idiots and revisionists No. People in the past were horrifyingly impoverished
2/
Medieval buffs and scholars are the absolute worst for this.
Figures in the Renaissance and Enlightenment made bullshit up about how "Backwards" the Medievals were compared to themselves, or the ancients... and now every medieval scholar has a chip on their shoulder.
3/
It's true the Medieval period isn't some great outlier from the ancient world, renaissance, or early modern.
But that's because all of these eras were horrifyingly, unthinkably, impoverished by the standard of anyone living today.
There's a lot of doomerism in the US and while some of this can verge really deranged, there are some really core insights you get from Rad Libertarians, Preppers, and geopolitics watchers, that most people simply have not internalized.
2/
Globally Every institution that makes up the modern world is about 80 years old
Every major government institution was set into place during or immediately after WW2.
Social security, education, health schemes, military policy...
And they've been impossible to change since
3/
The problem is every single one of these institutions assumes 1940s demographics where everyone has 3-4 kids and almost everyone dies of a heart attack at 65.
Medicare and Social Security were minor budget items when they came out...
Few understand how much warfare has changed in 70 years.
Sure most look at the Afghan defeats of the Soviets then the US and conclude insurgencies matter, but Afghanistan is a place these empires should have won!
the guerillas lacked their ultimate weapon:
Mega-cities
2/
Cities have always challenged armies.
Troy held 10 years, Athens held off the Spartans 30 years, hell Constantinople maintained its shrinking empire/kingdom/city-state 1000 years after Rome fell.
3/
the European theatre of WW2 was defined by 2 massive urban battles.
First Stalingrad broke the Wehrmacht's forward momentum and ended German dreams of Russian conquest
2 million people died in that city
.
It was only 3km deep from the surrounding fields to the Volga river