"These proposed redactions are necessary to protect the identities of witnesses and law enforcement personnel, to maintain grand jury secrecy..., and to conceal the government’s investigative avenues and techniques to the extent they were not revealed… https://t.co/1ES3Tv0WRH https://t.co/pHa1tXGUxTstorage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
167-1 Exhibit A
Trump was indicted by Smith on June 8th. Media are trying to get the MAL affidavit unsealed as well as other filings on this docket unsealed.
"Compelling governmental interests continue to require the sealing of the remainder of the affidavit, however. As an initial matter, the affidavit contains information that was not made public in the indictment because it would tend to reveal the identities of witnesses, law… https://t.co/0aojR3wOsvtwitter.com/i/web/status/1…
"On June 12, 2023, the government filed under seal a motion to disclose to defendants in the criminal case... eight search warrants—including the one at issue here—and supporting materials issued in connection with the investigation that led to the indictment of former President… https://t.co/NOlvxZ46yOtwitter.com/i/web/status/1…
"For example, ⬛️"
In a different affidavit for a different search warrant (that we don't know about, yet) is how I am reading/understanding this.
The Aug 22 Order being referred to there is docket entry 80 (possible typo in that screenshot).
That Order (second screenshot) cites media stories about threats to LEs. What is under the black bars, idk. Perhaps a specific threat to LE or a witness.
Footnote is also redacted.
"The affidavit here contains information that reveals matters that occurred before the grand jury whose disclosure has not otherwise been authorized...
That information must remain redacted."
"eight sealed search warrants, affidavits, and accompanying documents"
"...eight sealed search warrants—of which only the warrant at issue here has been made public..."
Like I’ve been saying, this guy was always sus. Way too connected to intel agencies, CEFC, etc. Might he have some dirt on the Bidens? Sure, he might have. But he always looked to be a bit dirty himself.
Trump announcing the indictment on June 8th was NOT what DOJ/SCO wanted. I'll show you.
The very first document on the docket is the motion to seal the indictment. It says that the grand jury returned an indictment on June 8th, 2023. (wish it gave a time, but it doesn't)
The filing says that Trump and Nauta were informed that they were targets of the investigation, but that neither Trump nor Nauta were informed of the decision to seek an indictment.
Citing intense media/public interests, the Special Counsel's Office wanted to keep the indictment sealed and asked the judge to issue a judicial summons to Trump and Nauta for Tuesday, June 13th, at which time they would unseal the indictment.
"The federal grand jury that has been hearing evidence in the Justice Department’s investigation of former President Donald Trump’s handling of classified documents is expected to meet again this coming week in Washington, according to multiple people familiar with the… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
"Prosecutors working for special counsel Jack Smith have been presenting the grand jury with evidence and witness testimony for months, but activity appeared to have slowed in recent weeks based on observations at the courthouse and sources.
"Jeremy Rosenberg, who investigates financial crimes for Bragg, had his gun removed recently for his interactions with Cohen"
"A law enforcement source said Bragg’s office is looking at how Rosenberg shared communications about Cohen with the office." twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
'Cohen’s attorney, Lanny J. Davis said: “The interactions between Mr. Rosenberg, Michael Cohen, and myself were always professional and focused on Mr. Cohen’s personal security, which we appreciated.”' twitter.com/i/web/status/1…