So often, a major reason that liberals see the world so differently from others is that the large media corporations they're told to exclusive trust simply do not tell them about major issues involving corruption on the part of Democratic politicians, especially Joe Biden:
*Before the 2020 election,* there was ample proof the Hunter Biden laptop wasn't "Russian disinformation" but was genuine and authentic. Almost no liberal could tell you what the evidence was because their media didn't mention it.
@lsanger We're going to do a show on this shortly breaking down how Wikipedia has become completely corrupted as an ideological weapon - it's barely disguised - but just look how they describe the various Hunter/Joe scandals: exactly how a DNC spokesperson or MSNBC host would do.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
When Angela Merkel -- who grew up in East Germany -- called Obama, enraged about our NSA spying revelations, she told him it was like the Stasi, but more powerful.
But we're propagandized to believe "tyranny" can only happen in the Bad Countries™:
Also: look how there's no accountability for DC political and media elites.
Debbie Wasserman Schultz was disgraced when 2016 WikiLeaks docs proved she had the DNC cheat for Hillary over Bernie. Now she continues to prance around like some moral scold.
Even 10 years ago, journalists would be too embarrassed to say the US Govt has a role to play in censoring the internet to "tamp down" on "falsehoods."
Because online censorship is now so central to the liberal establishment, they don't realize how twisted it is to say this:
It's also staggering to see a NYT journalist muse that "misinformation" isn't "protected by the 1st Amendment."
The NYT spent 18 months telling Americans that Saddam had WMDs. This would mean there'd be no barrier to prosecute or sue the NYT for spreading that disinformation.
Also: how can you call yourself a journalist and then believe that the US Govt is dedicated to combatting "disinformation"?
If you know even high-school-level US history, you know the US Security State specializes in spreading disinformation, not combatting it.
Right - if John Kerry take his billionaire-wife's private jet to a climate conference, or billionaire donors transfer cash to climate groups from their energy-consuming mega-yachts, they'll defend that on the ground that personal conduct is irrelevant:
From the start -- meaning the two NY Post stories on Oct 13, 2020 -- the key to the Hunter Biden archive was it revealed *Joe Biden's* involvement* in business deals Hunter was pursuing in China and Ukraine.
That's why CIA created the lie that it was "Russian disinformation."
But to this very day, Dems and media will simply outright lie and say the archive is about Hunter's sex and drug life, which has no relevance.
Many liberals have no idea what's in the archive about Joe because Big Tech censored it and media outlets suppressed the story.
Then, today, 2 of the most credible IRS whistleblowers you can imagine -- one a gay Dem -- were compelling in detailing how DOJ repeatedly interfered in the investigation to protect Hunter.
But again, liberals have no idea about any of this because their networks didn't air it.
RFK is the only Dem candidate denouncing: CIA/NSA/FBI; Biden's aggression toward both Russia and China; the union of state and corporate power to censor speech.
Because these issues have low value (at most) for left-liberals, they'll smear him on the road to voting for Biden:
As for COVID, vaccines, Fauci and the like, RFK and Marianne Williamson have similar views, but many who want to pretend they aren't blindly captive to the DNC use Marianne to feign this, so they overlook that for her, but not for RFK, because he's a real threat to Biden.
Yep: RFK spent his life as an environmental lawyer, suing large corporate polluters and the planet's scummiest corporations: like Smithfield, mass torturer of animals and menace to the public health.
But he has to be maligned because he opposes Biden:
The prized prosecutorial puppy of Robert Mueller's investigation, who became yet another #Resistance media icon - @aweissman - is arguing GOP House Members committed crimes by fulfilling their oversight role in questioning the FBI Director.