1/ They woke attack Merit the way they attack everything else: attacking the MEANING by claiming the social situation in which a thing occurs make that thing racist/sexist/etc.
Merit is "embedded" in "the ideology of whiteness" therefore all the standards of merit are racist.
2/ The next move is to claim the thing they're attackong maintains, reinforces, reproduces, perpetuates, empowers, enables, or otherwise "upholds" a an oppresive social "structure"
This usually is done by claiming the standards and principles in play are racist/sexist/etc.
3/ This is about merit in university applications.
Merit is about "can you do the work according to rigorous objective standards."
The woke attack the standards in the way I described in order to be able to remove them and replace them with their own woke standards.
4/ Wokeness interprets everything through the lens of power and politics, so their standards of good, excellence, quality, and merit, all reduce to "does this advance and empower wokeness."
If yes....the thing has merit.
If no...the thing has no merit.
5/ This is a paint by numbers set of moves the woke use, and we ought to stop letting them get away with it.
It's just a cheap paint by numbers deconstructive dialectic and we ough to reject it.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Leftists are *NEVER* going to make a show of calling Marx and other lefty theorissts racist, or to "center" their racism, even though what they say is as bad or worse then anything Jefferson ever wrote.
This must be always met with the good faith test: " they must be asked "are Marx, Engles, and Guevera vitrolic racist,and is that racism baked into the meaning and structure of their moral and political ideology?"
Make them show their cards...
The game is always "this guys was racist therefore his ideas are racist amd bad."
Ok, then do Marx, Engles, Guevara, Foucault, and all the other guys that the lefty social theorists adore.
But they won't, because the goal is to sink Jefferson and his ideals...
2/ In 2021 the National Education Association, the largest teacher union in the United States, explicitly endorsed bringing CRT into education (Pic 1)
There'a also a ton of books about CRT in education (Pics 2+3) exactly because CRT is *deeply* embedded in education studies.
3/ In January of 2005, Michael Jennings and Marvin Lynn published an article that explained that they were inventing "Critical Race Pedagogy" (pic 1) by blending Critical Race Theory and Critical Pedagogy (pics 2 + 3)
These people are very explicit about what they are doing.
1/ When the woke "negate" or "nullify" people, they create a social situation where people the woke want "nullified" lack the credibility, legitimacy, and social standing to be taken seriously
As such, the concerns, views, and ideas of nullified people can't get social traction https://t.co/dP2E36iP91twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
2/ For example, the way White men were nullified was to create a vocabulary of terms like "white privilege", "toxic masculinity," and "mansplaining" which can be used to socially delegitimize the ideas/concerns of white men without having to even engage with their ideas/concerns.
3/ So, when a white man says something a woke woman doesn't like, she can just say "MANSPLAINING!" and now the *FRAMING* of the debate is that whatever the white mans says is being condescending or dismissive of women...even though SHE is using the term "mansplain" to dismiss HIM
Using the activist handbook "beautiful trouble," as our guide I'll show you how none of the protests, marches, or social media campaigns are spontaneous, but are in fact well planned actions created by activists in order to extract concessions from whoever they target.
3/ The first step is called "power-mapping."
Power mapping is: "A tool to not only identify who holds that power, but, crucially, who holds influence over that person, and, therefore, who to target with your direct actions"
None of this implies Christians who oppose same sex relationships and behavior are required to give up that belief. It only means acknowledging that their reasons for opposing LGB are based on different arguments then the reason to oppose the T and Q.
This is important...
because I think a lot of Christians believe LGB and T are connected because they are both affirming unbiblical ways of living. Yes, but so is worshipping false Gods and yet they never gets lumped in with the LGBT discussion. Suppose they try to say "well, LGB and T are all...
2/ The on the ground fight to protect our children has been fought almost entirely by women like @AsraNomani@Michelle1Mart@4TiffanyJustice@Stillurfvseason and others who show up at meeting while dudes like this whine and cry on twitter.
I have had enough....
3/ I don't care about what these men have to say, nor do I care about their peculiar take on the Bible. I'm a loud and proud pentecostal, and I'm not running my activism according to the dictates of any other denomination. And ladies:
I *LOVE* what you are doing!!!