Vatnik Soup Profile picture
Jul 27, 2023 23 tweets 12 min read Read on X
In today's #vatniksoup, I'll discuss the current state of Twitter/X. After @elonmusk took over, the site's gotten rid of most their safety rules & monetized people who agree with Musk's politics & constantly use lies and deceit to create outrage and increase their audience.

1/19 Image
On 14 Jul 2023,Musk started paying ad share revenue to X's "creators". Besides some meme and Musk-fanboy accounts,these creators mostly consisted of accounts that regularly spread disinformation & outright lies.Many of them have also tried to manipulate their follower count.
2/19 Image
Many of these "creators" will shift their narrative as soon as a new trend evolves. Today, they'll talk about Bud Light, Hunter Biden and Ukraine, but tomorrow it's going to be something else - something that's trendy. These people are also experts on absolutely EVERYTHING.
3/19

Image
Image
Image
As the @CommunityNotes on X are generally considered to be a joke, and these outrageous claims garner millions of views, the accounts are good way to collect ad revenue.

So, here are some of the "creators" Elon gave revenue to:

4/19 Image
Jacob Creech AKA @WarClandestine, a far-right QAnon follower who started the "bioweapons labs in Ukraine" narrative that was picked by mainstream media on 24 Feb 2022. Jacob made around 500 USD a month from spreading lies and conspiracy theories.

5/19
Image
Image
Nick Sortor AKA @nicksortor, a some sort of far-right "citizen journalist" who spreads disinformation and promotes other grifters like @tuckercarlson and the MAGA gang. Nicky made around 750 USD a month from his "journalism".

6/19

Image
Image
Image
Rogan O'Handley AKA @DC_Draino, a far-right conspiracy theorist and "conservative commentator" who spreads lies and disinformation for engagement. He also seems to be a strong advocate for Putin's imperialism. O'Handley earned around 1400 USD a month from his lies.

7/19
Image
Image
Ashley St. Clair AKA @stclairashley, apparently a conservative comedian who makes fun of the "woke culture" and shares photos to her thirsty fans. To be fair, some of her jokes aren't that bad. Apparently she works for the @thebabylonbee. She made 1430 USD a month.

8/19
Benny Johnson AKA @bennyjohnson,a far-right podcaster and Trump supporter,who spreads outrageous lies & disinformation. In his most recent,he insinuated that the Obama's might have been involved in the death of one of their staff members. He made 1900 USD a month from lying.
9/19 Image
Ian Miles Cheong AKA @stillgray, a Malaysian grifter who will do anything for a quick buck.

Just read the thread:


10/19 https://t.co/MOK63Isxu0
Image
Andrew Tate AKA @cobratate, a far-right social media personality and alleged serial rapist and human trafficker.

He made around 4000 USD a month on X.

11/19

Image
Image
Image
Brian and Ed Krassenstein AKA @krassenstein and @edkrassen. The "controlled opposition" who challenge Elon's views, but not really.

They were suspended in 2019 for allegedly operating fake accounts. They became popular as the "Trump reply guys".

12/19
Image
Image
They allegedly promoted Russian Ponzi schemes on one of their websites, but were never charged for any of it. I recently asked Brian a question regarding X, but he apparently forgot to answer:

They both earned around 4860 USD a month on X.

13/19 https://t.co/nVL0kVxzcs

Image
Image
The strategy is very simple: Musk is giving money to people who promote his products (Tesla, SpaceX, etc.) or to people he agrees with in politics.

And the list is not comprehensive, and accounts like @catturd2 and @dom_lucre are also in the subscription system.

14/19
Image
Image
When I said that X has gotten rid of their safety rules, I meant it. On 26 Jul 2023, @dom_lucre was suspended for posting "child exploitation pictures".

@elonmusk himself revealed this, and the account was reinstated on the same day.

15/19 https://t.co/d0W9VHie6k
Image
Apparently,if @elonmusk likes your account, posting CSAM content gets you a slap on the wrist.

This is simply absurd, coming from a guy who just month ago considered Instagram's vast pedophile networks "extremely concerning".

16/19 Image
X's new blue checkmark system has also evolved into a huge disinformation promotion tool, and by spending small amounts of money, troll farms can promote and augment any kind of false narratives on the platform. This is why some old, big troll farms have resurfaced again.

17/19 Image
Also, in a recent and desperate measure to collect more ad revenue, X has started forcing brands to spend on advertising in order to keep their "gold checkmark", or the verification for being an authentic brand, organization or company.

18/19 Image
To battle the disinformation on X, I suggest you follow accounts like @Shayan86 and @hoaxeye.

Oh, and if the profile says anything about being "citizen/independent journalist", steer clear.

19/19


Image
Image
Image
Image
Past soups:

Support my work: https://t.co/R5xLjQf2Fhvatniksoup.com
buymeacoffee.com/PKallioniemi
Now let us watch some of these smaller accounts I mentioned, try and gain more traction and following from the thread, and the bigger ones staying completely silent as they have nothing to gain from it all.
APPENDIX: The content, called "Daisy's Destruction", that @dom_lucre allegedly shared was produced by Peter Scully, a notorious pedophile who was sentenced on five counts of rape by sexual assault of underage girls in 2018.

The video featured the torture and rape of three girls… https://t.co/H5JWVYKwqYtwitter.com/i/web/status/1…



Image
Image
Image
Image
@Trinityaudiobot

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Vatnik Soup

Vatnik Soup Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @P_Kallioniemi

Mar 29
In this 8th Debunk of the Day, we’ll discuss complaints about US financing of NATO, in particular how the US allegedly pays for European defense, leading to calls for a US withdrawal from the Alliance — which would only make it easier for Putin to invade more countries.

1/7 A flight of French and Polish Rafale and F-16 fighter jets above a NATO flag during the opening of the exhibition “Powerful because we are united”, dedicated to the 19th anniversary of Lithuania’s 2004 accession to NATO (OTD 22 years ago), in the bastion of the Vilnius defensive wall on March 29, 2023 (OTD 3 years ago) in Vilnius, Lithuania. (Photo by Oleg Nikishin/Getty Images)
NATO by itself costs peanuts. In fact, the core of NATO is a principle, an agreement, that ideally costs nothing. The main cost is defense spending, which the US is eagerly doing anyway: Trump has just announced a 50% increase in military spending for his “Department of War”.
2/7 Trump aides struggle with how to spend $500 billion more on military, Washington Post https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2026/02/21/trump-hegseth-budget-military/
Trump calls for US military spending to rise more than 50% to $1.5tn https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cy59kxl2xwzo
Image
To sow division and thereby weaken the Alliance, vatniks deliberately mix up different figures, such as contributions to the NATO common budget, with defense spending. And US military spending has been huge by the sheer fact that the US is the world’s largest economy.

3/7 Newsweek falsely claiming that the US pays 68% of NATO’s budget. The real number is 15%.

Elon Musk falsely claiming that the US pays for 2/3 of European defense. In another post he claimed it was 1/4. Both made-up numbers.  https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1870903805845598428 https://x.com/i/birdwatch/t/1870903805845598428
NATO has annual budgets and programs worth around EUR 4.6 billion in 2025 (representing 0.3% of total Allied defence spending), and up to EUR 5.3 billion in 2026. The US share for 2026-2027 is 15% of that: 0.8 billion.  Source: Funding NATO https://www.nato.int/en/what-we-do/introduction-to-nato/funding-nato
Read 7 tweets
Mar 9
In today’s Vatnik Soup, we’ll talk about why we’re doing this: why we think Ukraine is so important and why we believe that souping vatniks and debunking their propaganda narratives is so crucial to counter Russia’s & their allies’ wars of aggression and achieve real peace.

1/20 Image
War is expensive, and Russia is not a rich country that could afford this: Hospitals? Roads? Plumbing? No: everything into terror and destruction.

But not only that. There is a 2nd item in the Russian state budget that remains strong no matter what:

2/20
Image
Image
Image
Manufacturing support for that terror and destruction. Propaganda. Vatniks. “Innocent” travel bloggers. “Independent” journalists. “Patriotic” politicians. Russia spends hundreds of billions of rubles a year ($5 billion) on this, and that kind of money buys you A LOT of BS.

3/20 Image
Image
Image
Image
Read 20 tweets
Mar 2
In this second (and possibly last) Basiji Soup, we’ll explore how the Islamic Republic of Iran has prepared for a conflict with the US and Israel. We won’t cover the military aspects, but another kind of war — information warfare.

1/20 Image
In the 1st Basiji Soup, we souped the Islamic Republic, its disinformation operations, its hypocrisy, its support of terrorism including Russia’s, its (one-sided?) relationship with Putin, and the mass protests against it that started two months ago:

2/20
Image
The Internet blackout has been crucial in allowing the regime to cover up its massacre of the protesters and especially the scope of it, making it difficult to assess the number of victims. They went to great lengths to jam Starlink, after having made its use illegal.

3/20 Image
Image
Read 20 tweets
Feb 25
In this 7th Debunk of the Day, we’ll expose the “Chickenhawk” fallacy. The chickenhawk accusation or the “go to the front!” imperative is a dishonest attempt to silence anyone supporting Ukraine by pushing them to go fight. A barely hidden death wish, as it’s always uttered…
1/5 Image
Image
Image
…with zero regard for who you are or what your personal circumstances might be — you could already be there, on your way there, a veteran, or unable to fight. More broadly, not everyone can or should be a soldier, just as not everyone can or should be a policeman or a nurse.
2/5 Image
Image
Yet a society still needs those things to be done, and the fact that not everyone can go to medical school or fight crime does not mean that we have to surrender to invaders and criminals, nor that we cannot all have an opinion on healthcare.
3/5
Image
Image
Read 5 tweets
Feb 18
In this 6th Debunk of the Day, we’ll talk about a complex and controversial topic: conscription. It is used by vatniks to attack Ukraine for drafting men to fight, while conveniently ignoring the alternative, including the horrors of conscription into the Russian army.
1/8 Image
Military obligations are a reality in many countries, from the most peaceful democracies to the most tyrannical dictatorships — unless you have “bone spurs”. Some argue it is a necessity for defense against invading armies, especially for small countries.
2/8 Image
Others point out that it goes against individual rights or that a professional army is better. And Zelenskyy might agree: he did in fact end conscription. But then a full-scale invasion happened: exactly why many nations, including the US, still keep some form of draft.
3/8 Image
Image
Read 8 tweets
Feb 13
In today’s Vatnik Soup, we’ll introduce the International Olympic Committee (IOC) @Olympics . It’s mostly known for organizing sporting events, and for being supposed to foster the Olympic ideal while actually submitting to dictators.

1/15 Image
The International Olympic Committee (IOC) was founded in 1894 in Paris by Pierre de Coubertin with a noble goal: promote peace through sports. Politics out, sportsmanship in: sounds great in theory.

2/15 Image
But in practice, the IOC has a long history of accommodating authoritarian regimes, always in the name of “neutrality,” “dialogue,” and “keeping sports separate from politics”, usually not in a particularly consistent or moral way.

3/15 Image
Image
Read 16 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(