Judge Noreika asked USAtty––five times––if there was any precedent for such a one-sided plea agreement, like he gave to Hunter. He said no all five times and even admitted, "this was crafted to suit the facts and circumstances."
🧵 2/5 - Judge Noreika had never seen the type of agreement "Not to Prosecute" like the one she was being asked to sign off on. There was and is no precedent for @USAttyWeiss to give Hunter Biden such special treatment while strictly enforcing the law on everyone else.
🧵3/5 - Hunter gets a lifetime "Get Out of Jail Free Card" from @USAttyWeiss.
JUDGE: "Do you have any precedent for agreeing not to prosecute crimes that have nothing to do with the case or the charges being diverted?"
U.S. ATTY: " I am not aware of any, Your Honor."
🧵4/5 - For agreeing to plead guilty to misdemeanors and no jail time, the DOJ agreed never to prosecute Hunter again for the rest of his life. The actions taken by the @DOJCrimDiv and @USAttyWeiss are an insult to every other citizen.
🧵 5/5 - In fact, Judge Noreika was so surprised by the plea and diversion agreements, that she questioned their constitutionality and what role she would play going forward. It appears that @USAttyWeiss rigged the outcome for Hunter. Are you still a prosecutor, Mr. Weiss?
ADD-ON: 🧵 6/8.
These are from the U.S. Attorney's Criminal Tax Case Procedures Manual. It directs @USAttyWeiss to do the exact opposite of what he did in the Hunter Biden case. @Jim_Jordan - Please ask what is the reason he deviated from his training and policy directives?
🧵7/8 When @USAttyWeiss prosecutes people not named Biden, he says:
"General deterrence is primary consideration. A sentence of incarceration for tax cheats helps promote respect for the law and deter others. ... Guidelines reference need for sentences in tax cases to deter."
🧵 8/8 Who is @USAttyWeiss referring to here? If this does not apply to Hunter Biden, I cannot imagine a case that does. He added "This case, quite simply, is one many people are watching. A term of imprisonment will send a strong message...and deter others from acting the same.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1. Last week, your office charged #HunterBiden with two misdemeanor tax charges. AG Garland said you had sole charging authority over any prosecution. This raises some questions, I would appreciate you answering.
🧵 2/8
2. Over the last 30 years, no one had been charged under 26 U.S.C. § 7203, as a stand-alone misdemeanor using the same prongs as Mr. Biden. See below. Why is that? Is #HunterBiden receiving special treatment?
🧵3/8
3. Why did you announce #HunterBiden agreed to plead guilty to charges the public had not seen yet? It was 0 days between the filing of the charging document (information) and announcing a plea deal. This hurts the public and benefits the accused. Why did you do this?