1
What was the “true spirit” of Sufism in Kashmir? Historical evidence shows that what Sufis brought to Kashmir was genocide, violent conversion, destruction of temples to build Islamic structures & Dhimmitude for Hindus. Much of this is testified by Islamic chronicles themselves
2
In 1379, Saiyid Ali Hamadani (Shah-i-Hamadan), Sufi scholar from Hamadan Persia, fled from Timur with 600 disciples seeking refuge in Kashmir. Sultan Qutb-ud-din was eager to welcome him. The very first thing Hamadani did was to take over the temple of goddess Kali in Srinagar.
3
The beautiful land belonging to the Kali temple was given away by Qutb-ud-Din to be converted into Hamadani’s residence & its name changed to Khanquah-Maula. A mosque was built with dismantled remains of the Kali temple & turned into the center of Islamic activities in Kashmir.
4
Hamadani & his Islamic warriors started spreading out to towns & villages to preach & vilify the tolerant traditions of Kashmiri life as unacceptable to Islam. Hamadani first set about influencing Qutb-ud-din to transform Kashmir into a “true” fundamentalist islamic state.
5
Hamadani made Qutb-ud-din strictly implement the policies elaborated in his book “Zakhirat-Al-Muluk” on how rulers should deal with Zimmis (non-Muslims). The first 2 conditions were that NO temples or shrines were allowed to be built or repaired for idol worship.
6
Rules 3 & 4 said Muslims could stay in any Hindu temple for 3 days & must be treated as honored guests. Rule 5 specified that no Hindu could be a spy in a Muslim state. Rule 6 said that anyone willing to convert to Islam would be saved from persecution that Hindus had to suffer
7
Rules 7 & 8 stipulated that Hindus had to honor Muslims & leave the assembly as soon as a Muslim entered the premises. Rules 9 & 10 specified that Hindus must dress differently from Muslims so they could be easily identified & they were not allowed to take Muslim names.
9
Hindus could not ride a harnessed horse or carry weapons. They could not wear diamond rings or eat pork. Idols were banned & Hinduswere not allowed to build houses near Muslims. Hindus could not dispose or mourn their dead near Maqbaras, nor could they have Muslim slaves.
10
Above all if any Hindu disobeyed the rules, then it was Halal (lawful for Muslims) to KILL the Hindu! The Sufis transformed Kashmir from the land of Kashyap to the Dar-al-Islam (Abode of Islam) where Hindus lived lives worse than animals while being massacred & enslaved.
11
Qutb-ud-din was succeeded by Sikandar & Hamadan’s son Muhammad became Sikandar’s advisor. Muhammad was even more fanatic & wanted full-blown Jihad. His first victory was to convert Sikandar’s prime minister Suha Bhatt into Malik Saifuddin by marrying his young daughter.
12
Timur’s invasion gave Hamadani the perfect way to launch Jihad against Hindus. Timur demanded a tribute of 30,000 horses & 100,000 silver Tankas from Sikandar. A terrified Sikandar was told that destroying Hindu temples & melting Murtis would provide the money to satisfy Timur
13
Sikandar sanctioned destruction of temples & Hamadani’s men had an orgy of violence. As Jonaraja says “ There was no city, no town, no wood, where Suha Bhatt the Muslim left temples of the Gods unbroken. Of the images that once existed, only the name alone was left.”
14
The grandest ancient temples of Kashmir were destroyed to ruins, such as the Martanda sun temple, Chakradhara, Tripureshvara, Sureshvara, temples at Avantipura & Paraspor. So many temples were destroyed that Sikandar got the coveted title of “Butshikan” - destroyer of idols.
15
But destruction of temples was not enough for the Sufis. Their aim was to obliterate Hinduism from Kashmir & so the atrocities began. Sati was abolished leaving helpless Hindu widows vulnerable to rape. Tika on forehead was banned & Jizya imposed to crush Hindus economically
16
“Ralive, Tsaliv ya Galive (convert, leave or die) became a reality for Kashmiri Hindus. So much Hindu literature was sunk in the Dal Lake, that an entire causeway called Sad-i-Ishbari was built on top of them. Drinks, music & festivities were forbidden to establish pure Islam.
17
The Jama Masjid, Khanqah Maula mosque, mosques in Bavan & Bijibhara were all built from the material of demolished Hindu temples & the spacious courtyard of the Lokeshvari temple in Srinagar was converted into the Mazar-i-Salatin, its temples converted into tombs.
18
Muslim historians likes Firishta give detailed descriptions of unspeakable atrocities, temples obliterated, Hindu Murtis being melted to construct mosques, etc. Saiyids, ulama & new converts persecuted Hindus so much that Brahmins resorted to suicide, & others submitted.
19
In 1413, Sikandar’s son Ali Shah succeeded to the throne. Suha Bhatt & the Mullahs intensified their brutal Jihad. Hindus were forced to convert under threat of death, pressured with extremely heavy taxes & discriminatory laws. Brahmins became the primary targets of torture.
20
The extent of torture was so brutal that Jonaraja’s Dvitīyā Rājataraṅginī describe Brahmins eating poison, hanging, drowning, jumping off cliffs or burning themselves. Those who could - fled from Kashmir. The Sufis had forever destroyed the ancient Hindu culture of Kashmir
21
Historical evidence clearly attests that what Sufi Islam brought to Kashmir was heinous religious intolerance, brutal discrimination, & uncontrolled savagery against Hindus - to establish supremacy of Islam. Is this the spirit that we should seek to revive?
22
What the Sufis contributed to Kashmir's Hindus were horrifying broken remains of our temples, restless spirits of millions of massacred ancestors, & haunting fragments of our defaced gods. There was nothing tolerant, harmonious or syncretic about Sufi Islam in Kashmir.
23
It is ignorant at best & incredibly insensitive at worst to ignore the horrific genocide of Kashmir's ancient Hindu culture at the hands of Islamic Sufis. Instead we need a Holocaust Museum highlighting the atrocities that Sufis perpetrated on the ancient land of Devi Sharada.
23
References:
Parmu, Radha Krishna. "A history of Muslim rule in Kashmir 1320-1819." People’s Publishing House (1969).
All Images: by @MumukshuSavitri using Midjourney AI
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Hey @asadowaisi why are you resorting to quoting Richard M. Eaton - when Aurangzeb’s own official Islamic biography Maāsir-I-Ālamgiri itself lists him proudly destroying 300+ Hindu temples in Mewar in just one year alone (1680)! In his hateful quest to forcibly convert India into Dar-al-Islam, nothing was sacred. He desecrated innumerable Hindu gods, destroyed 500+ temples including Hinduism's holiest shrines, and built ugly mosques on top of them. Being a famous lawyer you should at least have looked up documented Islamic sources and respected Indian translators like Jadunath Sarkar who reference Aurangzeb’s destruction in great detail first.
As for the rest of your nonsensical lies about Pushyamitra Śunga and Raja Śaśanka destroying Buddhist sites - I will give you a history lesson on each one of these claims in next couple of days and debunk all your lies on them with meticulous references too. Hope you will read them just like this thread and apologize for falsifying history.
If you have the guts then go through this entire thread detailing all of Aurangzeb’s evil & horrific destruction of 500+ Hindu temples - entirely based on Islamic sources. After that If you have any shame left, apologize or else I challenge you to disprove a single incidence.
Read entire Thread ...🧵
2/10
Aurangzeb hated Hindus so much that he destroyed Mandirs even BEFORE becoming king! At the young age of 27, Aurangzeb destroyed the beautiful Chintaman temple, then forcibly converted it into a mosque & slaughtered a cow there. He then destroyed the temple of Khande Rai in Satara & proudly declared that he had gotten many temples in Gujarat demolished.
3/10
Aurangzeb was practically salivating to destroy the sacred Somnath Mandir, which he did early in his reign & when Hindus tried to rebuild it, the vitriolic monster ordered it to be completely annihilated. In 1661, he ordered all Hindu temples in Cooch Bihar to be destroyed & mosques built on top of them. His general Mir Jumla himself broke Bhagwan Narayan's image with an axe.
Madanamahotsava: Bharat’s Ancient Festival of Love and Spring
Centuries before St. Valentine or even Christ, Hindus celebrated love - not for a single day, but for nine joyous days of devotion, romance, and revelry in spring’s embrace. This grand festival called Madanamahotsava, also known as Vasantotsava, honored Kamadeva (Madana), the god of love, alongside his consort Rati and Vasanta, the spirit of spring. Referenced in Vatsyayana’s Kamasutra (400 BCE) and called Suvasantaka, it was a grand celebration of music, dance, playful festivity, and sacred rites dedicated to the spirit of love, beginning on Vasanta Panchami and culminating in the Vasantanavratras.
Let's explore the history of Bharat's festival of love 🧵
One of the earliest mentions of Madanmahotsava is found in Vatsyayana's Kamasutra (400 BCE). Clad in resplendent attire, men and women gathered in temples and royal courts at the advent of spring, seeking the blessings of divine couples for love and prosperity. Hemadri’s Vratakhanda (13th c.) recounts in detail the legendary tale of Kamadeva awakening Shiva from deep meditation to tempt him into union with Gauri. Furious at his Tapasya being disturbed, Shiva reduced him to ashes with a single fiery glance. Kamadeva's distraught wife, Rati begged and pleaded with Lord Shiva for his revival. Moved by Rati’s unwavering devotion and Gauri's persuasion, Shiva, in his boundless compassion, granted that Kamadeva would once again regain his physical form every year on the 13th day of the bright half of the spring month. Thus, the annual festival of Madanamahotsava was born - enshrining the triumph of love and renewal.
Rituals described by Hemadri included intricate kolam paintings, worship of the Ashoka tree, and offerings of sandalwood, incense, and flowers to Kamadeva, Shiva, Vasanta, and Vighnesvara. The king and his court led grand ceremonies, distributing sweets, delicacies, and paan as dakshina. Couples exchanged fine garments, jewelry, and floral gifts, culminating in the Rasa-mahotsava, a divine dance in honor of Krishna and Radha.
1/10
Indeed, Aurangzeb was not just any ordinary evil king - he epitomized the demonic savagery of Islamic fanaticism powered by hatred against infidel Hindu Kafirs. Aurangzeb was obsessed with such virulent hatred against Hindus that his official biography Maāsir-I-Ālamgiri itself lists him proudly destroying 300+ Hindu temples in Mewar in just one year alone (1680)! In his hateful quest to forcibly convert India into Dar-al-Islam, nothing was sacred. He desecrated innumerable Hindu gods, destroyed 1000s of temples including Hinduism's holiest shrines, and built ugly mosques on top of them. If you have the guts then read this entire thread detailing all his evil - entirely based on Islamic sources, and then do some soul searching for calling such a barbaric monster "Great".
Read entire Thread ...🧵
2/10
Aurangzeb hated Hindus so much that he destroyed Mandirs even BEFORE becoming king! At the young age of 27, Aurangzeb destroyed the beautiful Chintaman temple, then forcibly converted it into a mosque & slaughtered a cow there. He then destroyed the temple of Khande Rai in Satara & proudly declared that he had gotten many temples in Gujarat demolished.
3/10
Aurangzeb was practically salivating to destroy the sacred Somnath Mandir, which he did early in his reign & when Hindus tried to rebuild it, the vitriolic monster ordered it to be completely annihilated. In 1661, he ordered all Hindu temples in Cooch Bihar to be destroyed & mosques built on top of them. His general Mir Jumla himself broke Bhagwan Narayan's image with an axe.
1/7 The insidious agenda and lack of academic integrity of Ruchika Sharma, PhD in history from JNU & self-proclaimed academic expert, stands thoroughly exposed when we analyze her peer-reviewed paper (bit.ly/4h1tcSv) in the Journal of Archaeological Studies in India. Let's deconstruct her paper claim by fallacious claim and scrutinize it against factual evidence. I have created a summary table for easy reference. Please read entire thread for full details.🧵
False Assertion 1: Ruchika's primary claim in her paper is that Malwa Sultan Mahmud Khalji built a grand Islamic general hospital (Dar-us-Shifa) at Mandu, MP in 1443 CE which she identifies with an existing monument called “Gada Shah’s Shop” in Mandu. (Img 2)
Reality: Shockingly, Ruchika deliberately leaves out contradictory evidence from her OWN cited source (Ghulam, Yazdani (1929), Mandu: The City of Joy) which states that the structure Ruchika tries to misappropriate as an Islamic hospital was actually the royal Durbar/audience hall of Hindu Rajput King Medini Rai. (Img 3: Yazdani, p. 28, 79) Gada Shah is none other than Medini Rai. Medini Rai’s Durbar Hall was later called Gada Shah’s Shop by the Muslims. Rajput Medini Rai overthrew Mahmud Khalji’s son Mahmud 2 and ruled Mandu as a vassal of Rana Sangha from 1519 - 1528 CE. Ruchika’s source Yazdani also points out that both Gada Shah’s Shop (which she claims is Khalji’s hospital) and Gada Shah’s House (Palace) were built AFTER Khalji’s death by Medini Rai in the same architectural style. Two huge mural paintings of Medini Rai and his queen are still to be seen in Gada Shah’s House. The world-famous German art historian Dr. Hermann Goetz, an expert on Indo-Persian architecture, also clearly identified Gada Shah’s Shop and Gada Shah’s Palace as Rajput Medini Rai’s Durbar/Audience hall and palace residence in Mandu. (Img 4: Goetz)
Thread Continues....🧵
2/7 False Assertion 2: Ruchika’s entire identification of Medini Rai’s Durbar (Gada Shah’s Shop) with Khalji’s Islamic hospital is based on her personal architectural observations that the building is divided into two chambers which she assumes represent separate male and female patient chambers. She also cites that the “existence of small rooms but also big halls” matches Khalji’s Islamic hospital. (Img 5)
Reality: Ruchika’s own Islamic sources don’t even specify whether the hospital was located in Mandu. Her unsupported conjectural claim again completely ignores her own source Yazdani who points out that Medini Rai’s Durbar (now known as Gada Shah’s Shop) was built for the purpose of serving as a grand audience hall (durbar). In fact her source Yazdani even specifies that it was a Durbar-i-aam built for granting audience to the public while the nearby Hindōl Mahal served the purpose of a Durbar-i-Khas (Audience hall for select assemblies). (Img 7) This explains exactly why the architecture has such grand arches and separate small rooms because they were often built as showpieces of royal prestige. The usage of such grand arches makes no sense for the purpose of a building built as a hospital. Like Yazdani, Dr. Goetz also clearly states that Gada Shah’s Shop (Medini Rai’s Durbar) has “massive sloping buttresses because of the lateral pressure of the huge arches supporting the roof of the Audience Room”. (Img 8) Even the ASI website clearly labels the structure as an audience hall. Yet Ruchika ignores all this insurmountable proof, and makes the bizarre claim that this was Khalji’s Islamic hospital without a shred of objective evidence.
Thread Continues....🧵
3/7 False Assertion # 3: Ruchika’s Islamic source mentions a Hammam (Bath house) adjoining Khalji’s hospital. But since no such structure exists near Medini Rai’s durbar (Gada Shah’s Shop) - Ruchika claims that “scattered remains of a tank exist … which could have been the bath houses (hammam) that Shihab Hakim (1968, p. 64) points to.” She also claims the building is far away from the palace area but in close proximity to Khalji’s other buildings like the Madrasa and the Jama Masjid. (Img 9)
Reality: We can refer directly to Google Maps which clearly demonstrate that the only water tanks/reservoirs near Medini Rai’s durbar (Gada Shah’s Shop) are the Ujala baodi, the Prachin Hindu Baodi and Kapur tank. These were all obviously built as reservoirs for the Durbar halls and palaces and show no evidence of being used as Hammams. (Img 10) Google Maps also busts Ruchika’s false claim that her so-called “hospital” is located near Khalji’s Masjid & Madrasa. As can be clearly seen on the map, Medini Rai’s durbar (Gada Shah’s Shop) is a good distance away from the cluster of Khalji’s buildings which are further South. (Img 11) Clearly there is no evidence of any Hammam near Medini Rai’s durbar, but there are Hindus Baodis (wells) and Water tanks (Kapur tank). Thus Ruchika’s desperate attempt to retrofit her utterly flawed claim by misrepresenting geographical facts falls flat on its face.
Talk about a nasty bag full of distortions and outright lies. That Shree Rama existed centuries before Buddha was even born is attested directly by authentic Buddhist sources themselves. I will methodically dissect and disprove every deceptive claim by fact checking it against authoritative and authentic sources. Please read all parts of the entire thread to the end including the screenshots which provide crucial evidence. 🧵
Claim # 1:
Ram is a mythological character, whereas Buddha was a real historical figure—there’s simply no comparison.
Fact: False. This claim is disproven by the oldest & most authoritative Buddhist biography of Buddha’s life itself - Aśvaghoṣa’s (2nd c.) Buddhacharita. The Buddhacharita documents that Buddha belonged to the same Suryavanshi Ikshvaku dynasty as Rama; it pays homage to Valmiki as the Adikavi and mentions Janaka too. After he renounces his family, Buddha’s father sends a wise advisor to the forest to try & convince him to return back home. The advisor tries to persuade him to return by mentioning Rama as an example - as someone from older times, who returned after penance in forests to protect his kingdom against evil. In response Buddha himself says he cannot do what Rama did & refuses to return. This clearly proves that Rama was already revered as an ancient historical personality to be emulated in Buddha’s times.
Claim # 2: Buddha was not a descendant of Ram because Ram never existed in reality.
Fact: False. Disproved by the very first chapter on Buddha’s Birth in the authoritative biography Buddhacharita which records that Buddha was a descendant of the Suryavanshi Ikshvaku dynasty - from the same lineage to which Rama belonged millennia before him. An even older account of Buddha’s ancestral family tree is found in the Buddhist text Mahāvastu, a composite multi-life hagiography of the Buddha (2nd c. BCE) which details how the sons of Ikshvaku built Kapilavastu and were the forefathers of the Shakyas - the clan of the Buddha.
Claim #3: In fact, Buddha lived long before the Valmiki Ramayana was compiled.
Fact: False. We already know that Rama lived many millennia before Buddha from irrefutable evidence in the Ramayana itself & many other Hindu texts.Authoritative Buddhist texts like Mahavamsa also clearly record the Shakya clan as part of Suryavanshi Ikshvaku dynasty with the line of succession from Rishi Sagara to Dasharatha & Rama who lived many generations before Suddhodana (Buddha’s father). Moreover Princeton historian, Robert Goldman's comprehensive comparative analysis of the Ramayana proves that the descriptions of history & geography of Kosala in the Ramayana clearly reflect an era BEFORE the Buddha thus dating it prior to 5th c. BCE (time of Buddha) even by Western standards. His work is considered the most comprehensive & authoritative Western analysis of Ramayana’s historicity. As mentioned before the Buddhacharita also testifies to Valmiki already being revered as the ancient Adi Kavi during Buddha's era.
Kamal Khan explaining Mughal history is like a chihuahua barking - ear-splittingly irritating, wildly off-key, but you can’t help but watch the spectacle.
Of course the Mughals didn't "harm any community", they just built Minars out of Kafir skulls to show how much they cared for all communities and considered all Indians equal.
These "loving community building" exercises started with Timur's first entry into Hindustan, when he attacked the Hindu kingdom of Kator extending from Kashmir to Kabul. In his autobiography “Tuzak-I-Timuri” Timur describes building tall towers of skulls of “obstinate unbelievers” after raping & enslaving women & kids & plundering towns to dust (May, 1398 CE). The Zafarnama of Sharafuddin Ali Yazdi (Iran, 1425 CE) has a painting which shows how Timur took tribute from soldiers, while an Islamic Minar built out of dead Kafir’s heads looms behind him.
His Mughal descendants like Babur, Akbar, Shah Jahan kept up this grand tradition and built their own towers of Kafir skulls to show their caring loving hearts.
Read the full thread to know more.🧵
The next Mughal, Babur, practically salivated with delight at the prospect of killing Hindus & scattering them like “teased wool & broken bubbles on wine”. He built several Minars out of Hindu heads, during battles in the Doab, near Agra & Chanderi to name a few. So overjoyed was Babur with his bloody crimes that he waxed eloquent poetry about killing Kafirs in praise of God. After creating Minars out of their heads, he proudly declared himself a “Ghazi” as his official imperial title - a term which means “Victorious over the enemies of Islam”
You mention Birbal from the court of the Great “secular” Akbar, who occupied Delhi & Agra in true Mughal tradition by building towers of Hindu heads. He did the same in his conquest of Ahmedabad. He rewarded his commander Khan-i-Khanan (Bairam Khan), for building “8 sky high Minarets of Hindu heads” in Bengal. A painting in the illustrated Akbarnama shows Akbar at the 2nd battle of Panipat, in 1556 CE, where Bairam Khan & Akbar colluded to treacherously behead Hemu. It depicts “Ghazi” Akbar & his army stacking up heads of Hemu's soldiers into a tower/Minar of victory over Islam’s enemies.