🧵 ON THE BBC's FALSE CLAIMS in their article titled:
"False claims of bogus heatwave spread online"
FALSE CLAIM 1:
"The air temperature measurements taken in countries affected by the heatwave will have been obtained using instruments and methods approved by the World… https://t.co/FtOmWjMdKntwitter.com/i/web/status/1…
FALSE CLAIM 2:
"Contacted by the BBC, Mr Monotti directed us to the Italian Meteorological Service's website, which listed different temperature readings for that day in Jerzu.
However, none of those readings were taken in Jerzu itself, but instead in nearby municipalities (with… https://t.co/685Waw4U4Ttwitter.com/i/web/status/1…
FALSE CLAIM 3
That my tweet was misleading.
In fact, while the climate station used by the BBC for the 48.2°C claim, Jerzu RU, is ~10Km away, the weather station I reported, with a max of 41.5°C, is off a football pitch in Jerzu itself (JERZU RF). Therefore mine was the accurate… https://t.co/MSjbwumH3Ftwitter.com/i/web/status/1…
FALSE CLAIM 4
"He then alleged that the equipment to get that particular temperature reading did not abide by international standards."
I did not "allege": I stated as fact that the station used by the BBC is NOT approved by the WMO! Others are, and none of those reported… https://t.co/7OOJQ4Ibp0twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
FALSE CLAIM 6:
That my tweet is misleading. My tweet uses two sources both from the BBC indicating the forecast was not in line with current temperature in Sicily's biggest city. What was misleading was the BBC's claim of 46 & 47°C in Sardinia & Sicily. The BBC again uses a… https://t.co/GnKunQXJcbtwitter.com/i/web/status/1…
WHAT THE BBC AND I AGREE ON: Valid temperatures need, as a minimum, to be first recognised by national authorities, which are the temperatures I provided the BBC with, and ultimately by the WMO. Unapproved WMO stations therefore need two levels of further validation that they do… https://t.co/l0DF3uHrmjtwitter.com/i/web/status/1…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Nobody died of Covid, people died of: 1. Covid protocols: medical malpractice 2. Withdrawal of antibiotics for pneumonia: medical malpractice 3. Drugs associated with unnecessary intubation: medical malpractice
Stop blaming Covid for medical malpractice
Early Covid was REAL and a nasty disease, though quite rare. Easily treated though with a round of Azythromycin. Not giving the antibiotics because of some hearsay that "viruses" can't be treated with antibiotics was criminal negligence. Covid was a symbiotic viral-bacterial disease.
I am a patient who had bilateral Covid pneumonia right there at the start. I was even put on a respirator as had very low oxygen, not intubated thankfully. I had a good doctor. Not one of his patients died of Covid, ever. Including the elderly ones.
"I can very confidently assert, there is no climate emergency.
As much as it may upset many people, my message is the planet is NOT in peril.
Atmospheric CO2 and methane have negligible effect on the climate.
The policies government have been implementing are totally unnecessary and should be eliminated.
So far, [we] have totally misidentified what is the dominant process in controlling the climate, and all of the various models are based on incomplete and incorrect physics.
The dominant process, is “the cloud-sunlight-reflexivity thermostat mechanism.
Clouds are all bright white, and they reflected 90% of the sunlight back into space making them the most crucial yet most overlooked aspect of the climate system.
Two-thirds of the Earth are ocean. The Pacific Ocean alone is half the Earth. The average cloud cover for the Earth is 67%; about 50% over land and 75% over oceans.
I claim that the above conspicuous properties of clouds are the missing part of the puzzle."
MMR VACCINE AND AUTISM ASSOCIATION:
"Andrew Wakefield was a consultant gastroenterologist at the Royal Free Hospital in London. He was the lead author (one of 13) of a paper published in The Lancet in 1998 that raised concerns about an increase in gastrointestinal symptoms in children with a new regressive form of Autism. Andrew Wakefield recommended further studies to investigate the root cause, but as there was an association with the MMR vaccine he recommended a return to single vaccines based on precautionary principle to reduce risk. What then ensued was something Andrew never imagined. His career was cut short, funding for his research dried up, he was forced to leave the NHS and move to the US. But it didn't end there with further accusations of fraud, hoax and referral to the GMC. After several years Andrew was struck off. For years the name Andrew Wakefield has been synonymous with "quack", "ant-vaxxer", "fraud", "dangerous doctor", "negligent doctor" and more. But was he, is he? Or is he possibly the truest form of ethical doctor?"
WHY DO COVID "VACCINES" CAUSE CANCER?
Angus Dalgleish, Professor of Oncology at St George’s Hospital Medical School in London, former President of the Clinical Immunology and Allergy Section of the Royal Society of Medicine explains.
WORLD COUNCIL FOR HEALTH EXPERT PANEL FINDS CANCER PROMOTING DNA CONTAMINATION IN COVID-19 VACCINES
International expert panel concludes that Covid vaccines are contaminated with foreign DNA and that SV40, a cancer-promoting genetic sequence has been found in the vaccines
Bath, U.K. – The World Council for Health, in collaboration with expert advisers, is dedicated to providing the public with accurate and reliable information to promote health and well-being. In light of recent concerns regarding bacterial DNA and genetic sequences in mRNA vaccines, the World Council for Health organized an Urgent Expert Hearing on this critical topic on Monday 9th October.
The hearing took place virtually and addressed the implications of these findings for all people of the world. The following internationally renowned immunologists, geneticists, specialist physicians and research scientists shared their findings with the audience:
•Kevin McKernan (USA)
•Dr Janci Lindsay (USA)
•Prof Sucharit Bhakdi (Germany)
•Assoc Prof Byram Bridle (Canada)
•Dr Peter McCullough (USA)
•Prof Brigitte König (Germany)
•Dr Jessica Rose (Canada)
•Prof Alexandra Henrion-Caude (France)
•Attorney Katie Ashby-Koppens (Australia) shared the legal implications of the deployment of unregulated GMO products as vaccines
Summary of Findings:
1 Bacterial DNA (plasmids) has been found in mRNA vaccine vials.
2 A cancer-promoting genetic sequence—SV40—has been found in the Covid-19 vaccines. This was not present in the vials used for the approval studies but has been found in all vials of the BioNTech vials disseminated for public use.
3 These discoveries have been confirmed in several independent laboratories worldwide.
4 The discovery was originally made in April 2023 by Kevin McKernan at which point regulatory bodies were contacted. No official reply has been received.
5 Multiple mechanisms exist in which this genetic information might be integrated into the human genome.
6 This DNA could instruct our bodies to produce mRNA and foreign proteins for an unknown period with potential implications for subsequent generations.
7 There is no constructive purpose identified for the undeclared SV40 promotor sequence, which in addition to its cancer risk, enhances the capacity to incorporate the other foreign genetic material into the recipients’ own chromosomes potentially rendering them (and possibly even their offspring) permanently genetically modified.
8 There are multiple completely undeclared genetic sequences in both Moderna and Pfizer vials with the SV40 sequence found only in the Pfizer vials. However, latent SV40 infections in a significant portion of the population could present the same SV40 risk to Moderna recipients.
9 Even in the absence of chromosomal integration, the DNA plasmids could generate mRNA for the spike protein toxin and other harmful proteins for prolonged and unpredictable periods of time.
10 Integration of foreign DNA into the human genome disrupts existing natural genetic sequences; this carries further risk of disease including cancer.
11 The Covid-19 vaccines qualify as GMO (genetically modified organism) products, which require approval in addition to that required for older, more traditional vaccines.
12Informed consent for these products is impossible as the risks of the products have never been formally and transparently assessed by regulators and are not fully known. Independent assessment of the emerging and available evidence is that these products are extremely dangerous with implications for disease, death, transmission and inheritance.
13 An immediate moratorium on these novel genetic “vaccines” was demanded by the expert panelists.
How COVID Shots Could Drive Cancer:
Kevin McKernan, Medicinal Genomics, "explains that in many cases, when tumors are sequenced, they’re found to contain sequences from SV40 and other viruses, which can integrate into your genome, causing disruptions and instability that can trigger the cell line to grow out of control.
In the case of COVID-19 shots, he says, "The concern is if this DNA integrates the genome, one portion of the SSV40 sequence is an SV40 promoter, a very strong promoter, which means it drives transcription wherever it lands in the genome.
If this happens to drop itself in front of a proto-oncogene [a gene that has the potential to cause cancer] and drives a lot of expression off of a gene that's known, if you hyper-express it and turn the cell cancerous, then we have a concern that DNA is in fact doing that."
But not only do COVID-19 shots contain SV40 promoters, they also contain a 72 base pair insertion that makes the promoter much more aggressive and also drives the sequence into the nucleus of the cell. "And they're right next to each other," McKernan says. "If this DNA moves into the nucleus and it drags a promoter with it, and that integrates in front of a gene, it can disrupt gene regulation and potentially lead to the oncogenesis."12
At the same time, a Pfizer trial showed that the shots may induce lymphocytopenia and neutropenia, or low concentrations of white blood cells. This could further allow for cancerous changes to proliferate. "After vaccination, patients have lower white blood cells, which you need to clear out cells that are misbehaving, like cancer cells," McKernan adds.
He’s also seen research showing that the spike protein from COVID-19 shots can enter the nucleus and disrupt regulation of p53 and BRCA1 genes:
"People are probably familiar with BRCA1 because of breast cancer genes, but p53 is also another guardian of the genome. These are genes that clean up genomes that have been broken or have integration events ...
If you have all three of those potentially increased integration risks happening, with white blood cell reduction and spike protein inhibiting the genes that are meant to clean up this type of problem, the combination of those things could certainly be tied to the rise in cancer that we're currently seeing."