🧵 ON THE BBC's FALSE CLAIMS in their article titled:
"False claims of bogus heatwave spread online"
FALSE CLAIM 1:
"The air temperature measurements taken in countries affected by the heatwave will have been obtained using instruments and methods approved by the World… https://t.co/FtOmWjMdKntwitter.com/i/web/status/1…
FALSE CLAIM 2:
"Contacted by the BBC, Mr Monotti directed us to the Italian Meteorological Service's website, which listed different temperature readings for that day in Jerzu.
However, none of those readings were taken in Jerzu itself, but instead in nearby municipalities (with… https://t.co/685Waw4U4Ttwitter.com/i/web/status/1…
FALSE CLAIM 3
That my tweet was misleading.
In fact, while the climate station used by the BBC for the 48.2°C claim, Jerzu RU, is ~10Km away, the weather station I reported, with a max of 41.5°C, is off a football pitch in Jerzu itself (JERZU RF). Therefore mine was the accurate… https://t.co/MSjbwumH3Ftwitter.com/i/web/status/1…
FALSE CLAIM 4
"He then alleged that the equipment to get that particular temperature reading did not abide by international standards."
I did not "allege": I stated as fact that the station used by the BBC is NOT approved by the WMO! Others are, and none of those reported… https://t.co/7OOJQ4Ibp0twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
FALSE CLAIM 6:
That my tweet is misleading. My tweet uses two sources both from the BBC indicating the forecast was not in line with current temperature in Sicily's biggest city. What was misleading was the BBC's claim of 46 & 47°C in Sardinia & Sicily. The BBC again uses a… https://t.co/GnKunQXJcbtwitter.com/i/web/status/1…
WHAT THE BBC AND I AGREE ON: Valid temperatures need, as a minimum, to be first recognised by national authorities, which are the temperatures I provided the BBC with, and ultimately by the WMO. Unapproved WMO stations therefore need two levels of further validation that they do… https://t.co/l0DF3uHrmjtwitter.com/i/web/status/1…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The truth about "polio" paralysis: it was DDT poisoning:
"Flying and Biting Bugs on Jones Beach Die in a Cloud of DDT, New Insecticide—A truck-mounted for generator squirts the poison, mixed with oil droplets, over a four-mile area of the New York City playground. Spread by Army and Navy planes and by hand sprays, DDT routed dangerous disease-bearing flies and mosquitoes on Pacific islands. DDT has a drawback—it kills many beneficial and harmless insects, but does not kill all insect pests. Birds and fish which eat large numbers of DDT-poisoned insects may be casualties too. (National Geographic Magazine, October 1945, p. 410)"
The truth about "polio" paralysis: it was DDT poisoning.
"The great expectations held for DDT have been realized.” Penn Salt chemicals advertisement. (Time Magazine, June 30, 1947)
Bergamo in March 2020 was a choreographed piece of military theatre to hoodwink global populations into lockdowns, as revealed in Italy's Covid enquiry in November 2024.
Martedì 19 Novembre 2024 ore 10:30
Audizioni rappresentanti OSA Polizia, COISP e Fondazione TDC19 ETS
"Presso la sala del II piano di Palazzo San Macuto, la Commissione parlamentare di inchiesta sulla gestione dell'emergenza sanitaria causata dalla diffusione epidemica del virus sars-cov-2 e sulle misure adottate per prevenire e affrontare l'emergenza epidemiologica da sars-cov-2, ha svolto le seguenti audizioni:
ore 10.30 rappresentanti di OSA Polizia (Organizzazione sindacale autonoma Polizia);
ore 11.00 COISP (Coordinamento per l'indipendenza sindacale delle Forze di Polizia);
ore 11.30 Fondazione TDC19 ETS (Terapie domiciliari Covid-19 Ente del terzo settore)." webtv.camera.it/evento/26677
CLIMATE LOCKDOWNS BEGIN
SPAIN: Same playbook as Covid psyop: create mass psychosis using a "shock" event (e.g. Valencia floods) to implement draconian restrictions and to further Agenda 2030 goals.
People are snitching on each other for driving in the rain or going for a walk outside during heavy rains in Malaga (just like in 2020!); all activity halted today in Granada (schools, shops,etc.) due to a light shower.
"BILLIONAIRES TRY TO SHRINK WORLD'S POPULATION
Report Says" (WSJ, 2009)
"The New York meeting of billionaires Bill Gates, Warren Buffett, David Rockefeller, Eli Broad, George Soros, Ted Turner, Oprah, Michael Bloomberg and others was described by the Chronicle of Philanthropy as an informal gathering aimed at encouraging philanthropy. Just a few billionaires getting together for drinks and dinner and a friendly chat about how to promote charitable giving.
There was no agenda, we were told. And no plan for a follow-up meeting.
"Taking their cue from Gates they agreed that overpopulation was a priority," the article said, adding that "this could result in a challenge to some Third World politicians who believe contraception and female education weaken traditional values."
Such a stand wouldn't be surprising. Mssrs. Gates, Buffett and Turner have been quietly worrying about Malthusian population problems for years. Mr. Gates in February outlined a plan to try to cap the world's population at 8.3 billion people, rather than the projected 9.3 billion at which the population is expected to peak.
But some right-leaning blogs have started attacking the billionaires as forming a kind of secret sterilization society or giant ATM to fund abortions. It fed into time-honored fears of the rich using their wealth to reshape mankind in its preferred image. Some are raising the specter of eugenics."
"NO EXTENSION OF NATO'S JURISDICTION FOR FORCES OF NATO ONE INCH TO THE EAST of a unified Germany" - US Secretary of State Baker to Gorbachev, 1990.
"NOT ONE INCH EASTWARD": HOW NATO LIED TO RUSSIA:
Declassified documents show security assurances against NATO expansion to Soviet leaders from Baker, Bush, Genscher, Kohl, Gates, Mitterrand, Thatcher, Hurd, Major, and Woerner
"U.S. Secretary of State James Baker’s famous “not one inch eastward” assurance about NATO expansion in his meeting with Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev on February 9, 1990, was part of a cascade of assurances about Soviet security given by Western leaders to Gorbachev and other Soviet officials throughout the process of German unification in 1990 and on into 1991, according to declassified U.S., Soviet, German, British and French documents posted today by the National Security Archive at George Washington University
The documents show that multiple national leaders were considering and rejecting Central and Eastern European membership in NATO as of early 1990 and through 1991, that discussions of NATO in the context of German unification negotiations in 1990 were not at all narrowly limited to the status of East German territory, and that subsequent Soviet and Russian complaints about being misled about NATO expansion were founded in written contemporaneous memcons and telcons at the highest levels.
The documents reinforce former CIA Director Robert Gates’s criticism of “pressing ahead with expansion of NATO eastward [in the 1990s], when Gorbachev and others were led to believe that wouldn’t happen.”
The first concrete assurances by Western leaders on NATO began on January 31, 1990, when West German Foreign Minister Hans-Dietrich Genscher opened the bidding with a major public speech at Tutzing, in Bavaria, on German unification. The U.S. Embassy in Bonn (see Document 1) informed Washington that Genscher made clear “that the changes in Eastern Europe and the German unification process must not lead to an ‘impairment of Soviet security interests.’ Therefore, NATO should rule out an ‘expansion of its territory towards the east, i.e. moving it closer to the Soviet borders.’” The Bonn cable also noted Genscher’s proposal to leave the East German territory out of NATO military structures even in a unified Germany in NATO.
This latter idea of special status for the GDR territory was codified in the final German unification treaty signed on September 12, 1990, by the Two-Plus-Four foreign ministers (see Document 25). The former idea about “closer to the Soviet borders” is written down not in treaties but in multiple memoranda of conversation between the Soviets and the highest-level Western interlocutors (Genscher, Kohl, Baker, Gates, Bush, Mitterrand, Thatcher, Major, Woerner, and others) offering assurances throughout 1990 and into 1991 about protecting Soviet security interests and including the USSR in new European security structures. The two issues were related but not the same. Subsequent analysis sometimes conflated the two and argued that the discussion did not involve all of Europe. The documents published below show clearly that it did.
The “Tutzing formula” immediately became the center of a flurry of important diplomatic discussions over the next 10 days in 1990, leading to the crucial February 10, 1990, meeting in Moscow between Kohl and Gorbachev when the West German leader achieved Soviet assent in principle to German unification in NATO, as long as NATO did not expand to the east. The Soviets would need much more time to work with their domestic opinion (and financial aid from the West Germans) before formally signing the deal in September 1990.
As late as March 1991, according to the diary of the British ambassador to Moscow, British Prime Minister John Major personally assured Gorbachev, “We are not talking about the strengthening of NATO.” Subsequently, when Soviet defense minister Marshal Dmitri Yazov asked Major about East European leaders’ interest in NATO membership, the British leader responded, “Nothing of the sort will happen."
'NATO Expansion: What Gorbachev Heard'
"Declassified documents show security assurances against NATO expansion to Soviet leaders from Baker, Bush, Genscher, Kohl, Gates, Mitterrand, Thatcher, Hurd, Major, and Woerner" nsarchive.gwu.edu/briefing-book/…