THE ROTHSCHILDS NEVER FORGAVE PUTIN FOR THIS! And now they want your children to die for their greed!

Did you know that Yukos, the oil company that produced 20% of Russia’s gas, was secretly under the control of British based Zionist globalist Jacob Rothschild, who also controlled the British Royal Family?

Putin then returned to the Russian state and the Russian people the gas in Rothschild's control. The Rothschilds were furious and started planning the war against Russia. Oh and they did exactly the same in WW1 only then they picked Germany instead of Russia and the oil was in Baghdad and they wanted to stop the Berlin-Baghdad railway to transport the oil to Germany.

"NOT ONE INCH EASTWARD"
OR HOW NATO FOOLED RUSSIA
" U.S. Secretary of State James Baker’s famous “not one inch eastward” assurance about NATO expansion in his meeting with Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev on February 9, 1990, was part of a cascade of assurances about Soviet security given by Western leaders to Gorbachev and other Soviet officials throughout the process of German unification in 1990 and on into 1991, according to declassified U.S., Soviet, German, British and French documents posted today by the National Security Archive at George Washington University

The documents show that multiple national leaders were considering and rejecting Central and Eastern European membership in NATO as of early 1990 and through 1991, that discussions of NATO in the context of German unification negotiations in 1990 were not at all narrowly limited to the status of East German territory, and that subsequent Soviet and Russian complaints about being misled about NATO expansion were founded in written contemporaneous memcons and telcons at the highest levels. 

The documents reinforce former CIA Director Robert Gates’s criticism of “pressing ahead with expansion of NATO eastward [in the 1990s], when Gorbachev and others were led to believe that wouldn’t happen.”[1] The key phrase, buttressed by the documents, is “led to believe.”

President George H.W. Bush had assured Gorbachev during the Malta summit in December 1989 that the U.S. would not take advantage (“I have not jumped up and down on the Berlin Wall”) of the revolutions in Eastern Europe to harm Soviet interests; but neither Bush nor Gorbachev at that point (or for that matter, West German Chancellor Helmut Kohl) expected so soon the collapse of East Germany or the speed of German unification.[2]

The first concrete assurances by Western leaders on NATO began on January 31, 1990, when West German Foreign Minister Hans-Dietrich Genscher opened the bidding with a major public speech at Tutzing, in Bavaria, on German unification. The U.S. Embassy in Bonn (see Document 1) informed Washington that Genscher made clear “that the changes in Eastern Europe and the German unification process must not lead to an ‘impairment of Soviet security interests.’ Therefore, NATO should rule out an ‘expansion of its territory towards the east, i.e. moving it closer to the Soviet borders.’” The Bonn cable also noted Genscher’s proposal to leave the East German territory out of NATO military structures even in a unified Germany in NATO..
The conversations before Kohl’s assurance involved explicit discussion of NATO expansion, the Central and East European countries, and how to convince the Soviets to accept unification. For example, on February 6, 1990, when Genscher met with British Foreign Minister Douglas Hurd, the British record showed Genscher saying, “The Russians must have some assurance that if, for example, the Polish Government left the Warsaw Pact one day, they would not join NATO the next.” (See Document 2)
Not once, but three times, Baker tried out the “not one inch eastward” formula with Gorbachev in the February 9, 1990, meeting. He agreed with Gorbachev’s statement in response to the assurances that “NATO expansion is unacceptable.” Baker assured Gorbachev that “neither the President nor I intend to extract any unilateral advantages from the processes that are taking place,” and that the Americans understood that “not only for the Soviet Union but for other European countries as well it is important to have guarantees that if the United States keeps its presence in Germany within the framework of NATO, not an inch of NATO’s present military jurisdiction will spread in an eastern direction.” (See Document 6) 
8)" "Afterwards, Baker wrote to Helmut Kohl who would meet with the Soviet leader on the next day, with much of the very same language. Baker reported: “And then I put the following question to him [Gorbachev]. Would you prefer to see a united Germany outside of NATO, independent and with no U.S. forces or would you prefer a unified Germany to be tied to NATO, with assurances that NATO’s jurisdiction would not shift one inch eastward from its present position? He answered that the Soviet leadership was giving real thought to all such options [….] He then added, ‘Certainly any extension of the zone of NATO would be unacceptable.’” Baker added in parentheses, for Kohl’s benefit, “By implication, NATO in its current zone might be acceptable.” (See Document 8)

Well-briefed by the American secretary of state, the West German chancellor understood a key Soviet bottom line, and assured Gorbachev on February 10, 1990: “We believe that NATO should not expand the sphere of its activity.” (See Document 9) After this meeting, Kohl could hardly contain his excitement at Gorbachev’s agreement in principle for German unification and, as part of the Helsinki formula that states choose their own alliances, so Germany could choose NATO. Kohl described in his memoirs walking all night around Moscow – but still understanding there was a price still to pay.

All the Western foreign ministers were on board with Genscher, Kohl, and Baker. Next came the British foreign minister, Douglas Hurd, on April 11, 1990. At this point, the East Germans had voted overwhelmingly for the deutschmark and for rapid unification, in the March 18 elections in which Kohl had surprised almost all observers with a real victory. Kohl’s analyses (first explained to Bush on December 3, 1989) that the GDR’s collapse would open all possibilities, that he had to run to get to the head of the train, that he needed U.S. backing, that unification could happen faster than anyone thought possible – all turned out to be correct. Monetary union would proceed as early as July and the assurances about security kept coming. Hurd reinforced the Baker-Genscher-Kohl message in his meeting with Gorbachev in Moscow, April 11, 1990, saying that Britain clearly “recognized the importance of doing nothing to prejudice Soviet interests and dignity.” (See Document 15)"

WHAT JD VANCE WARNED US ABOUT:
GEORGESCU ARRESTED IN ROMANIA
Romanian Presidential front runner candidate Calin Georgescu arrested in Romania, following cancelled elections he was due to win. He should be President of Romania, instead he is in jail. Cаlin Georgescu was arrested for questioning about "actions against the constitutional order, public incitement, initiation of a fascist organization, and false statements regarding the sources of financing for the electoral campaign."

HIV PASSPORTS ARE THE NEW GLOBALIST TROJAN HORSE

“HIV is neither necessary nor sufficient to cause AIDS.”
Luc Montagnier

AIDS is the new trojan horse for digital IDs now linked by Big Pharma/Big ID to sexual activity and HIV status.

First they used travel bans and Covid19 fearmongering, but it didn't work to get a large enough numbers of the young hooked on digital IDs to balance those resisting them, so now they are using sex and the fear of AIDS to usher in their digital ID system for the next generations.

You heard it here first.

And yes, repeated boosters will compromise the immune system leading to V-AIDS (vaccine acquired immuno-deficiency syndrome) which will be misdiagnosed as "HIV caused AIDS", and splices of HIV in the "vaccine" mRNA spike protein coding will make it more likely for the "vaccinated" to PCR test positive for HIV, starting the new PCR pseudoepidemic of HIV false testing. 2015 gain of function research confirming HIV pseudovirus used in SARSCOV made in Wuhan:

2015: A SARS-like cluster of circulating bat coronaviruses shows potential for human emergence
Vineet D Menachery, Boyd L Yount, Jr, [...], and Ralph S Baric

"Pseudotyping experiments were similar to those using an
👉HIV-based pseudovirus, prepared as previously described10, and examined on HeLa cells (Wuhan Institute of Virology) that expressed ACE2 orthologs."

"In the version of this article initially published online, the authors omitted to acknowledge a funding source, USAID-EPT-PREDICT funding from EcoHealth Alliance, to Z.-L.S. The error has been corrected for the print, PDF and HTML versions of this article."

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…

LUC MONTAGNIER, 2008 NOBEL PRIZE FOR DISCOVERING HIV:

"The HIV virus is harmless and passive, a benign virus."

Luc Montagnier
1990 AIDS conference
San Francisco In 1990 Montagnier said the cause of the immune collapse known as AIDS was a mycoplasma (infertans) infection, which made the harmless HIV virus more dangerous. The cure for mycoplasma infections? Tetracycline antibiotics, same as in severe Covid19 infection in the example of Doxycycline. Oh and they work against cancer too in some cases.

The truth about "polio" paralysis: it was DDT poisoning:
"Flying and Biting Bugs on Jones Beach Die in a Cloud of DDT, New Insecticide—A truck-mounted for generator squirts the poison, mixed with oil droplets, over a four-mile area of the New York City playground. Spread by Army and Navy planes and by hand sprays, DDT routed dangerous disease-bearing flies and mosquitoes on Pacific islands. DDT has a drawback—it kills many beneficial and harmless insects, but does not kill all insect pests. Birds and fish which eat large numbers of DDT-poisoned insects may be casualties too. (National Geographic Magazine, October 1945, p. 410)" dissolvingillusions.com/graphs-images/

Bergamo in March 2020 was a choreographed piece of military theatre to hoodwink global populations into lockdowns, as revealed in Italy's Covid enquiry in November 2024. presskit.it/en/2024/11/21/…

As of today I will be boycotting all @ArlaDairyUK products. I suggest you do the same.
This is not acceptable @ArlaDairyUK
news.arlafoods.co.uk/news/major-ret…

CLIMATE LOCKDOWNS BEGIN
SPAIN: Same playbook as Covid psyop: create mass psychosis using a "shock" event (e.g. Valencia floods) to implement draconian restrictions and to further Agenda 2030 goals.
People are snitching on each other for driving in the rain or going for a walk outside during heavy rains in Malaga (just like in 2020!); all activity halted today in Granada (schools, shops,etc.) due to a light shower. More info here:
abc.es/espana/comunid…

"BILLIONAIRES TRY TO SHRINK WORLD'S POPULATION
Report Says" (WSJ, 2009)
"The New York meeting of billionaires Bill Gates, Warren Buffett, David Rockefeller, Eli Broad, George Soros, Ted Turner, Oprah, Michael Bloomberg and others was described by the Chronicle of Philanthropy as an informal gathering aimed at encouraging philanthropy. Just a few billionaires getting together for drinks and dinner and a friendly chat about how to promote charitable giving.
There was no agenda, we were told. And no plan for a follow-up meeting.

"Taking their cue from Gates they agreed that overpopulation was a priority," the article said, adding that "this could result in a challenge to some Third World politicians who believe contraception and female education weaken traditional values."
Such a stand wouldn't be surprising. Mssrs. Gates, Buffett and Turner have been quietly worrying about Malthusian population problems for years. Mr. Gates in February outlined a plan to try to cap the world's population at 8.3 billion people, rather than the projected 9.3 billion at which the population is expected to peak.
But some right-leaning blogs have started attacking the billionaires as forming a kind of secret sterilization society or giant ATM to fund abortions. It fed into time-honored fears of the rich using their wealth to reshape mankind in its preferred image. Some are raising the specter of eugenics." wsj.com/articles/BL-WH…

"NO EXTENSION OF NATO'S JURISDICTION FOR FORCES OF NATO ONE INCH TO THE EAST of a unified Germany" - US Secretary of State Baker to Gorbachev, 1990. "NOT ONE INCH EASTWARD": HOW NATO LIED TO RUSSIA:
Declassified documents show security assurances against NATO expansion to Soviet leaders from Baker, Bush, Genscher, Kohl, Gates, Mitterrand, Thatcher, Hurd, Major, and Woerner
"U.S. Secretary of State James Baker’s famous “not one inch eastward” assurance about NATO expansion in his meeting with Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev on February 9, 1990, was part of a cascade of assurances about Soviet security given by Western leaders to Gorbachev and other Soviet officials throughout the process of German unification in 1990 and on into 1991, according to declassified U.S., Soviet, German, British and French documents posted today by the National Security Archive at George Washington University

The documents show that multiple national leaders were considering and rejecting Central and Eastern European membership in NATO as of early 1990 and through 1991, that discussions of NATO in the context of German unification negotiations in 1990 were not at all narrowly limited to the status of East German territory, and that subsequent Soviet and Russian complaints about being misled about NATO expansion were founded in written contemporaneous memcons and telcons at the highest levels. 
The documents reinforce former CIA Director Robert Gates’s criticism of “pressing ahead with expansion of NATO eastward [in the 1990s], when Gorbachev and others were led to believe that wouldn’t happen.”

The first concrete assurances by Western leaders on NATO began on January 31, 1990, when West German Foreign Minister Hans-Dietrich Genscher opened the bidding with a major public speech at Tutzing, in Bavaria, on German unification. The U.S. Embassy in Bonn (see Document 1) informed Washington that Genscher made clear “that the changes in Eastern Europe and the German unification process must not lead to an ‘impairment of Soviet security interests.’ Therefore, NATO should rule out an ‘expansion of its territory towards the east, i.e. moving it closer to the Soviet borders.’” The Bonn cable also noted Genscher’s proposal to leave the East German territory out of NATO military structures even in a unified Germany in NATO.

This latter idea of special status for the GDR territory was codified in the final German unification treaty signed on September 12, 1990, by the Two-Plus-Four foreign ministers (see Document 25). The former idea about “closer to the Soviet borders” is written down not in treaties but in multiple memoranda of conversation between the Soviets and the highest-level Western interlocutors (Genscher, Kohl, Baker, Gates, Bush, Mitterrand, Thatcher, Major, Woerner, and others) offering assurances throughout 1990 and into 1991 about protecting Soviet security interests and including the USSR in new European security structures. The two issues were related but not the same. Subsequent analysis sometimes conflated the two and argued that the discussion did not involve all of Europe. The documents published below show clearly that it did.
The “Tutzing formula” immediately became the center of a flurry of important diplomatic discussions over the next 10 days in 1990, leading to the crucial February 10, 1990, meeting in Moscow between Kohl and Gorbachev when the West German leader achieved Soviet assent in principle to German unification in NATO, as long as NATO did not expand to the east. The Soviets would need much more time to work with their domestic opinion (and financial aid from the West Germans) before formally signing the deal in September 1990.

As late as March 1991, according to the diary of the British ambassador to Moscow, British Prime Minister John Major personally assured Gorbachev, “We are not talking about the strengthening of NATO.” Subsequently, when Soviet defense minister Marshal Dmitri Yazov asked Major about East European leaders’ interest in NATO membership, the British leader responded, “Nothing of the sort will happen."

'Hitler’s Bank: The Unknown Story Of The Bank For International Settlements—Introduction'—By Mark Arnold
"Wolfe, who himself had a career as a banker earlier in his life, clearly states that the purpose for this financial crisis, which is actually still on-going, is:
“… to take down the United States and the U.S. dollar as the stable datum of planetary finance and, in the midst of the resulting confusion, put in its place a Global Monetary Authority—a planetary financial control organization to ‘ensure this never happens again.’”

The BIS is, in effect, its own sovereign state; and is where all the world’s central banks (55 are members) meet to analyze the global economy and determine what actions they will take, thus pulling the strings of the world’s monetary systems. The stock of the BIS is owned by the member central banks, much the same as the stock of most national central banks is owned by the banks in orbit around them. In other words, just like the U.S. Federal Reserve Bank, the BIS is privately owned. It is controlled by a board of directors comprised of central bankers from 11 different nations; the United States, the United Kingdom, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Sweden, the Netherlands and Switzerland. Within the BIS the single most powerful and elite group is the Economic Consultative Committee (ECC), current members of which include U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke, Bank of England governor Mark Carney, Mario Draghi of the European Central Bank, Zhou Xiaochuan of the Bank of China, plus the central bank governors of Germany, France, Italy, Sweden, Canada, India and Brazil." [2016] fromanativeson.com/2016/04/23/hit…

Do viruses exist? – Doctors for COVID Ethics
Michael Palmer, MD and Sucharit Bhakdi, MD
"In the context of the COVID-19 “pandemic”, many people have come to understand that political and scientific authorities have been systematically lying about the origin of the infectious agent, as well as the need for and the safety of mandatory countermeasures, including lock-downs, masks and vaccines. Some skeptics have gone further and begun to question the existence of the virus responsible for COVID-19, or even of viruses and pathogenic germs altogether. Here, we put these questions in perspective.

Before we go into any specifics on germs and viruses, we should acknowledge that the public has ample reason to mistrust not only politicians, public officials and the media, but also the “scientific community...”

Has the SARS-CoV-2 virus ever been isolated?

Yes, it has been—numerous times. An overview of such studies has been provided by Jefferson et al. [15]. A solid study that correlates virus isolation, PCR and clinical findings in a series of hospitalized COVID-19-patients has been published by Wölfel et al. [16]. It is also possible to buy samples of the purified virus from the American Type Culture Collection. These are heat-inactivated, but they should still permit investigators with the required expertise and equipment to confirm the identity of the virus.
The legend that SARS-CoV-2 has never been isolated is founded solely on the rigid demand that such isolation be accomplished without the use of cell cultures. As noted before, practicing virologists are highly likely to ignore this demand, for which we cannot fault them.

But isn’t COVID-19 just the flu rebranded?

It was indeed quite striking that concomitantly with the rise of COVID-19 case numbers those of influenza took a nosedive. This can be understood as follows:
 It is quite common for respiratory infections to be caused by more than one virus. If testing is not comprehensive, then the tests chosen will skew the results.
 The hysteria around COVID-19 caused physicians to carry out diagnostic tests selectively for COVID-19, to the exclusion of other respiratory pathogens.
 Extremely loose criteria were used for diagnosing COVID-19 infections. You have likely heard of the widespread problems with false-positive PCR tests.
The flawed laboratory methods could not but lead to many spurious diagnoses of COVID-19. The patients so diagnosed were then usually not tested any further for influenza, which caused the number of diagnosed influenza cases to drop off. Failure to test for bacterial pathogens caused patients with bacterial pneumonia to go unrecognized and be denied the necessary treatment with antibiotics. This was just one of the many forms of medical malpractice in the COVID-19 era that were the real drivers of excess mortality [17,18].

Conclusion

While we have every reason to distrust and indict today’s medical and scientific establishment, this should not lead us to disregard solid scientific evidence where it exists. Germ theory in general and also virology are very rich in such evidence, notwithstanding their recent distortions and abuses, which must urgently be identified and corrected. However, the remedy lies not in radical skepticism bordering on nihilism. Instead, we must recapture and rekindle the spirit of rigorous but unprejudiced debate that once made medical science great." doctors4covidethics.org/do-viruses-exi…

'How the British Invented Communism (And Blamed it on the Jews)':
'Trotsky and British Intelligence'
"When the Tsar was overthrown on March 15, 1917, Trotsky was working as a journalist in New York City. He set sail for Russia, but British authorities arrested him when his ship stopped in Halifax, Nova Scotia.
The British held Trotsky for a month in a Canadian internment camp.
For reasons unknown, Britain’s Secret Intelligence Service (SIS) came to Trotsky’s rescue, ordering his release. The order came from William Wiseman, US station chief for Britain’s foreign intelligence division, now known as MI6.
Following Trotsky’s release on April 29, 1917, he embarked for Russia and joined the Revolution. The rest is history.
In Russia, British handlers kept Trotsky close. One of his handlers was Clare Sheridan, who happened to be Winston Churchill’s first cousin. She was a sculptress who claimed to be a Bolshevik sympathizer. Sheridan sculpted Trotsky’s portrait, and was rumored to be his lover. Reliable sources have identified Sheridan as a British spy.
Trotsky was banished by Stalin in 1929, spending the rest of his life on the run.
During the Moscow Treason Trials of 1938, Trotsky was convicted, in absentia, of working for the British SIS. The star witness against him was Soviet diplomat Christian Rakovsky, who testified that British intelligence had blackmailed him in London in 1924, using a forged letter, all allegedly with Trotsky’s knowledge and approval.
“I went to Moscow and talked to Trotsky [afterwards],” Rakovsky testified. “Trotsky said that the forged letter was only an excuse. He agreed that we were to work with the British Intelligence.”

'Hidden History'
"Soviet show trials are not the most reliable sources. However, a good deal of independent evidence corroborates Rakovsky’s testimony.
If Rakovsky’s charge is true, then Trotsky was already working for British intelligence as early as 1924. In that case, his relationship with the British was likely established some time earlier, perhaps as early as 1917, when MI6 mysteriously freed him from a Canadian internment camp.
The evidence suggests that Trotsky was already under SIS control in 1920, when Churchill publicly denounced him as a scheming “International Jew.”
Seen in this light, Churchill’s anti-Jewish rant in the Illustrated Sunday Herald begins to look like a cover story.
But covering for what?
What was Churchill trying to hide, by blaming Jews—and Trotsky, in particular—for the Russian Revolution?
You will not find the answer in conventional history books. The story has been erased.
But, in 1920, memories were still fresh. Witnesses were speaking out. The British faced hard questions about their role in the Russian Revolution. They needed a scapegoat."
richardpoe.com
richardpoe.com/2023/01/08/how…

Electric cars pollute 1,850 times more than fuel-based vehicles, study finds
The 2022 U.K.-based Emissions Analytics study found that after driving both a gas and electric car 1,000 miles, the number of particles collected from the EV was vastly greater than the gasoline-powered car.
"The 2022 study from the U.K.-based Emissions Analytics group found that during a 1,000 mile journey, EVs release 1,850 times more pollutants into the surrounding environment than gas-powered vehicles, due to the heavier weight which eats through tires.
While many think of emissions from exhaust, tire wear plays a significant role in emitting pollutants. The synthetic rubber used to create tires include certain chemicals that get released into the air, and because EVs are significantly heavier than conventional cars due to massive lithium batteries.

Overall, EVs weigh about 30 percent more than gas-powered vehicles, and cost thousands more to make and buy. These issues are in addition to the fact that they are not suitable in colder climates (such as Canada and the northern U.S.), offer poor range and long charging times (especially in cold weather), and have batteries that take tremendous resources to make and are hard to recycle. "

Anthony Murdoch lifesitenews.com/news/electric-…

Heiko Schöning has suggested that the next "pandemic" will be bacterial, will destroy the microbiome in the gut, and that the false solution will be an antibiotic. He also suggested that the mRNA injected people may be sensitive to these bacteria.

It has occurred to me that antibiotic resistant genes have been found in the mRNA vials. It is possible that this was part of the setup for the next "pandemic": some specific bacteria will be resistant to treatment with antibiotics. This may be the bacteria involved in the next "pandemic".

Please see below what antibiotic resistant genes have been found in the mRNA vials: Contamination with antibiotic/spike-containing expression vectors in the COVID-19 modified mRNA products:

"There is a high level of dsDNA contamination in the Pfizer products. This dsDNA contamination is in the form of circular expression vectors containing a spike gene and two 👉antibiotic resistance genes for kanamycin and neomycin.This is contamination and we do not know if these contaminants are accidental, or if they were put there"



Original publication:

Pfizer and Moderna bivalent vaccines are transformation competent in E.coli:

"An unknown portion of these dsDNA contaminants are replication competent plasmids..these plasmids provide 👉antibiotic resistance on LB-Kan plates and can be isolated from E.coli cultures."

jessicar.substack.com/p/contaminatio…
anandamide.substack.com/p/pfizer-and-m…

Israel/oPt: UN experts appalled by reported human rights violations against Palestinian women and girls | OHCHR
"Palestinian women and girls have reportedly been arbitrarily executed in Gaza, often together with family members, including their children, according to information received. “We are shocked by reports of the deliberate targeting and extrajudicial killing of Palestinian women and children in places where they sought refuge, or while fleeing. Some of them were reportedly holding white pieces of cloth when they were killed by the Israeli army or affiliated forces,” the experts said.

The experts expressed serious concern about the arbitrary detention of hundreds of Palestinian women and girls, including human rights defenders, journalists and humanitarian workers, in Gaza and the West Bank since 7 October. Many have reportedly been subjected to inhuman and degrading treatment, denied menstruation pads, food and medicine, and severely beaten. On at least one occasion, Palestinian women detained in Gaza were allegedly kept in a cage in the rain and cold, without food.

“We are particularly distressed by reports that Palestinian women and girls in detention have also been subjected to multiple forms of sexual assault, such as being stripped naked and searched by male Israeli army officers. At least two female Palestinian detainees were reportedly raped while others were reportedly threatened with rape and sexual violence,” the experts said. They also noted that photos of female detainees in degrading circumstances were also reportedly taken by the Israeli army and uploaded online." ohchr.org/en/press-relea…

2024 IS A PEAK SOLAR ACTIVITY YEAR IN THE 11 YEAR SOLAR CYCLE. THIS CAUSES CLIMATE CHANGE, NOT CO2. WHAT CAUSES THIS CYCLE?
Jupiter exerts a gravitational pull on the Sun. Jupiter's full solar orbit is 11.85 years long. From Earth we experience and observe a regulae cycle of Solar intensity increasing and peaking then waning of 11 years. This is Jupiter plus all other planets combined exerting a regular pull of the Sun towards us. This 11 year pull also increases solar activity on the Sun's surface. We can see this increased activity manifest through more Sun Spots. We can see this 11 year cycle in tree rings on planet Earth going back millennia. Just like the Moon exerts a pull on the Earth's Sea which manifests in high and low tides, Jupiter exerts a pull on the Sun's surface which manifests in increased Sun spot frequency and intensity. This is what creates the 11 year Schwabe cycle, as well as the the 178 Jose cycle as all the planet orbits realign with this duration, as the planet orbits are always changing due to the pull of the planets on each other. The changing solar activity due to the changing orbital distances and combined gravitational solar and planetary pulls is what causes both solar activity to vary according to even longer regular cycles, including the 1,000 year Bray-Halstatt global warming cycle. CO2 change is the effect of these combined gravitational changes which cause warming and cooling, it is not the cause. This is because sea water releases CO2 when it heats up, and absorbs CO2 when it cools down. The sea heating and cooling is caused by the Sun heating and cooling the Earth's atmosphere, as well as the Sun's cyclical influence over the Earth's cloud cover. Volcanic activity is also determined by proximity and activity of the Sun and its gravitational pull over the Earth's molten core. Earthquakes are also timed and linked with Solar gravitational pull and activity.

Robin Monotti Correction: the 1,000 year cycle is called the Eddy Cycle.

2024 IS A PEAK SOLAR ACTIVITY YEAR IN THE 11 YEAR SOLAR CYCLE. THIS CAUSES CLIMATE CHANGE, NOT CO2. WHAT CAUSES THIS CYCLE?
Jupiter exerts a gravitational pull on the Sun. Jupiter's full solar orbit is 11.85 years long. From Earth we experience and observe a regulae cycle of Solar intensity increasing and peaking then waning of 11 years. This is Jupiter plus all other planets combined exerting a regular pull of the Sun towards us. This 11 year pull also increases solar activity on the Sun's surface. We can see this increased activity manifest through more Sun Spots. We can see this 11 year cycle in tree rings on planet Earth going back millennia. Just like the Moon exerts a pull on the Earth's Sea which manifests in high and low tides, Jupiter exerts a pull on the Sun's surface which manifests in increased Sun spot frequency and intensity. This is what creates the 11 year Schwabe cycle, as well as the the 178 Jose cycle as all the planet orbits realign with this duration, as the planet orbits are always changing due to the pull of the planets on each other. The changing solar activity due to the changing orbital distances and combined gravitational solar and planetary pulls is what causes both solar activity to vary according to even longer regular cycles, including the 1,000 year Bray-Halstatt global warming cycle. CO2 change is the effect of these combined gravitational changes which cause warming and cooling, it is not the cause. This is because sea water releases CO2 when it heats up, and absorbs CO2 when it cools down. The sea heating and cooling is caused by the Sun heating and cooling the Earth's atmosphere, as well as the Sun's cyclical influence over the Earth's cloud cover. Volcanic activity is also determined by proximity and activity of the Sun and its gravitational pull over the Earth's molten core. Earthquakes are also timed and linked with Solar gravitational pull and activity.

Robin Monotti researchgate.net/publication/31…

GB News presenter Neil Oliver cleared by Ofcom over ‘turbo cancer’ claims
Seventy complaints were made to Ofcom after the presenter linked an aggressive form of cancer in young to Covid-19 vaccines
"The television presenter Neil Oliver has been cleared by the broadcasting watchdog after he pushed claims about the existence of a so-called turbo cancer...
An episode broadcast on January 13 attracted 70 complaints to the regulator Ofcom after Oliver, 56, claimed that young, healthy people were dying of an aggressive form of cancer and linked it to Covid-19 vaccines...
Ofcom assessed Oliver’s comments but has ruled they do not raise issues that warrant an official investigation under the Broadcasting Code.
The regulator said: “In line with freedom of expression, our rules allow broadcasters to cover controversial themes and topics. We recognise that these brief comments were the presenter’s personal view and did not materially mislead the audience, we therefore will not be pursuing this further.” thetimes.co.uk/article/gb-new…

THOMAS GOLD, former Professor of Astronomy at Cornell University Thomas Gold argued that oil wells & gas fields are charged and re-charged with new oil & gas from below. He claimed that most new hydrocarbons are generated deep in the crust, rising into geological traps at several different depths for particular parts of the crust. That is the abiogenic theory of hydrocarbon production, which is supported by astronomical data and by lab data simulating conditions in the deep crust and upper mantle.
Rapid charging of oil fields would require deeper secondary reservoirs under pressure, feeding into the primary reservoirs as they are depleted." oilprice.com/Energy/Energy-…