Prof. Stefan Rahmstorf 🌏 🦣 Profile picture
Jul 28, 2023 35 tweets 17 min read Read on X
Here's a thread in pictures about the Atlantic overturning circulation #AMOC which is making headlines this week. I've studied this topic since 1991 and will show key data and models & some video.
Let's go: observed temperature trend since 1901 from 🧵1/x nature.com/articles/nclim…
Image
The northern Atlantic stands out as the only region that has defied global warming and actually cooled. Here a couple of further views with different data, from Zeke Hausfather and Ed Hawkins. 2/x

Image
Image
Image
And a couple more short-term snapshots from NOAA and NASA. 3/x
Image
Image
That was air temperatures, but the literally underlying cause is low sea surface temperatures. Here is the sea surface temperature change in the ERA5 reanalysis data. 4/x Image
And the satellite data from Copernicus from the European Atlas of the Seas. 5/x Image
And here the observed sea surface temperature trends from 1870 to 2016 (HadISST data) from our 2018 Nature paper, .
We take this 'cold blob' as a symptom of a slowing of the #AMOC, the Atlantic overturning circulation, shown schematically. 6/x https://t.co/FVDsOwtpGLnature.com/articles/s4158…
Image
So what is this #AMOC? It's a near-surface northward flow along the Atlantic, from the far south up to the high north. There the water gives off its heat to the atmosphere, sinks down and returns south in 2-3 km depth. A schematic animation from NASA. 7/x
The AMOC is part of the global overturning circulation driven by density differences. It supplies the deeper waters with oxygen. Schematic from my 2002 Nature article; yellow dots is where the water sinks into the deep. 8/x https://t.co/JPvIaBWT2inature.com/articles/natur…
Image
In reality the ocean circulation looks rather more complex and turbulent! Here an animation of the ocean in the CM2.6 climate model of NOAA's Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Lab in Princeton. 9/x https://t.co/Shev0iGVElgfdl.noaa.gov/high-resolutio…
Now if you add CO2 to the atmosphere in that model you get the sea surface temperature change pattern shown on the left. The data you saw earlier are on the right - in this case both normalised (divided by global mean change). 10/x Image
Key point: both the 'cold blob' and the excessive warming along the American coast are a telltale 'fingerprint' pattern of an #AMOC slowdown. The theory behind this is explained in Rong Zhang 2008, . (Graph for increase > reverse.) 11/x https://t.co/L62Ksx8Tfpagupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.10…
Image
So the high-resolution climate model predicts this fingerprint in a CO2 scenario. The observed temperature trend since 1870 shows it. But so do the Copernicus satellite data shown earlier. Here a graph by Ruijian Gou. 12/x Image
And the standard CMIP6 models used for simulations of historic climate & future projections (e.g. in IPCC reports) show this fingerprint (left) is correlated with the #AMOC (overturning stream function, right). From Latif et al. 2022, . 13/x https://t.co/WvrlZ3qnwRnature.com/articles/s4155…
Image
Let's get on to time evolution. In Caesar et al. 2018 we used the 'cold blob' sea surface temperature for winter (Nov-May) to reconstruct the #AMOC since 1870. Blue curve is for the cold blob area. 14/x https://t.co/38DWD0kMkQnature.com/articles/s4158…
Image
Independently, paleoclimate colleagues using sediment and other kinds of proxy data have published their AMOC reconstructions. We compiled them in a 2021 paper: . Light blue is our curve from the previous tweet. 15/xnature.com/articles/s4156…
Let's look at the same results in another way. These use very different methods. Nutrient content in the water, sediment grain sizes where the deep southward return flow passes, etc. The give rather consistent results: the #AMOC is now at its weakest in a millennium. 16/x
Image
Image
Or zoom into the time since 1950 (for those proxies going so close to present) and compare to the measurements from the RAPIC project and modern reconstructions using hydrographic, satellite & cable data (red, orange). From . Looks quite consistent. 17/x https://t.co/v6lNZxvTz1nature.com/articles/s4156…
Image
Now to the elephant in the room: the tipping point. The current IPCC report explains what a tipping point is with this graph. Basically a point beyond which the system moves by itself into a very different state without being pushed further. 18/x Image
The climate system has a number of "tipping elements" (subsystems with tipping points). Here's a nice overview from Germany's national science academy Leopoldina. 19/x https://t.co/VMRLA5lk98leopoldina.org/fileadmin/reda…
Image
The possible #AMOC tipping point was first described in a very simple feedback model by Henry Stommel in Tellus 1961. The northern Atlantic is rather salty because of the AMOC, and the AMOC works because it's rather salty there (and the water thus dense enough to sink). 20/x Image
Wally Broecker called this feedback a "chicken and egg situation" and famously warned about "unpleasant surprises" in Nature 1987. 21/x Image
Broecker was an ocean and paleoclimate scientist, and his concern was raised by abrupt regional climate changes particularly focused on the northern Atlantic, most likely due to abrupt AMOC transitions. I wrote a review on those in Nature 2002: . 22/x https://t.co/55DgnnVBPBnature.com/articles/natur…
Image
Stommel's simple model has a quadratic solution with a bifurcation point, which depends on how much freshwater (from rain, rivers and ice melt) dilutes the salty ocean in the northern Atlantic. Too much and it breaks down. (AMOC flow rate is labelled 'NADW' here.) 23/x Image
Now Stommel's model is very simple, but complex climate models can trace that bifurcation diagram by very slowly ramping up freshwater until the AMOC breaks down, than ramping down the freshwater again. You get this 'hysteresis'. 24/x From https://t.co/aHgJPSVU1wagupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/20…
Image
Afaik this behaviour is robust across all models where it has been tested. The tipping point is real, but models differ greatly how close we are. And there are indications most models are too stable. They predict the 'cold blob' for the future, see this IPCC graph. 25/x Image
But the models don't expect it to appear already now. Another IPCC graph comparing historic simulations to observations. More discussion on why models are too stable here in our RealClimate blog: 26/x https://t.co/7PxvfuVK50realclimate.org/index.php/arch…
Image
A paper by Liu et al. 2007 corrected for inaccurate salinities in a model and found the AMOC collapsed in a CO2 experiment (orange), while the uncorrected model did not (blue). The collapse caused NW Europe to cool. From . 27/x https://t.co/Hkk4K37cUzscience.org/doi/10.1126/sc…

Image
Image
Enter methods from nonlinear physics, looking for Early Warning Signals (EWS) in the variability, before a tipping point is reached, as in Boers 2021. The tipping point is where lambda reaches zero. More on that also at Realclimate. 28/x https://t.co/ajf3QLTLR1nature.com/articles/s4155…
Image
The new Uni Copenhagen study making headlines now uses a similar EWS approach on the Caesar 2018 AMOC reconstruction discussed above, and predicts a tipping point in the time range 2025-2095. Earlier than we all thought a few years ago. 29/x https://t.co/HxMVF3BEBAnature.com/articles/s4146…
Image
Did I talk about impacts yet? Consequences of an #AMOC breakdown would be desastrous. Not just cooling (left) but also major shifts in tropical rainfall belts (right), here from the recent OECD report on Climate Tipping Points, 30/x https://t.co/LKLI2Azbmgoecd-ilibrary.org/sites/abc5a69e…
Image
Also major dynamic sea level changes on top of the global rise due to warming and ice melt. From Levermann et al. 2005, . Plus reduced ocean CO2 uptake, ecosystem disruption, loss of oxygen in the deeper ocean, extreme weather events, ... 31/x https://t.co/ImruuGix7qlink.springer.com/article/10.100…
Image
I must come to a close. Two weeks ago I gave the introductory keynote for a two-day AMOC session at the IUGG Conference in Berlin, and here is my conclusion slide. The point on Antarctica refers to the Nature cover story of Li et al, 32/x https://t.co/jZMzISWl18nature.com/articles/s4158…
Image
Even though it is uncertain exactly how close we are to tipping points, the consequences would be so serious that we must try to absolutely minimise the risk. It's one more reason to stick to the Paris 1.5 °C goal. The latest IPCC report has sent out a clear warning. 33/x Image
And finally, the OECD Climate Tipping Points Report also states it very clearly. Don't take my word for it. I really hope that those playing down tipping point risks have studied the evidence carefully enough to know what they are talking about. 🧵34/end Image
Here's a 10-minute video on the #TippingPoint risk of the Atlantic overturning circulation #AMOC: my keynote at the Tipping Points conference in Exeter last September.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Prof. Stefan Rahmstorf 🌏 🦣

Prof. Stefan Rahmstorf 🌏 🦣 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @rahmstorf

Mar 26
A new study by van Westen et al. shows that the #tippingpoint of the Atlantic overturning circulation #AMOC is also found in a high-resolution ocean model which resolves ocean eddies. A first, but no surprise to AMOC experts. 🧵
To find the tipping point you need to do a very slow, long hysteresis model run. That is so computationally expensive that it hasn't been tried before. All models which have tried show this tipping point - we published a first intercomparison in 2005. 🧵 agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/20…
So all kind of models since Stommel's 1961 box model show it, due to the destabilising salt transport feedback. The new model also shows the well-known sea surface temperature fingerprint pattern of an #AMOC shutdown: the 'cold blob', and warming along the American coast. 🧵 Image
Read 5 tweets
Mar 15
Zur Erinnerung: Kernfusion ist /keine/ Klimalösung sondern klimaschädlich. (Nur falls jemand auf die Idee kommt, diese Träume von Merz mit Klimaschutzgeldern zu subventionieren.)
Kurzer Thread in 5 Bildern. Image
Image
Image
Read 7 tweets
Jan 12
2024 war global das heißeste Jahr seit Beginn der Aufzeichnungen, mit 1,6 Grad über dem Temperaturniveau des späten 19. Jahrhunderts. Kleiner Thread mit Datengrafiken dazu. 🧵 Image
In Deutschland war es ebenfalls das wärmste Jahr seit Beginn der Aufzeichnungen - allerdings schon 3,1 Grad wärmer. Weil Deutschland ein Landgebiet ist, erwärmt es sich doppelt so schnell wie der globale Mittelwert, der 71% Meeresfläche enthält. 🧵 Image
Diese moderne Erderwärmung ist praktisch komplett vom Menschen verursacht. Natürliche Faktoren haben weniger als + oder - 0,1 °C beigetragen. Das ist eine Kernaussage des Weltklimarats IPCC. Eher - als +, weil die Sonnenaktivität etwas abgenommen hat. 🧵 Image
Read 7 tweets
Nov 19, 2024
Important new study shows that current climate models underestimate the human-caused slowing of the #AMOC (Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation), because they neglect freshwater influx from Greenland melt and other sources. /1
nature.com/articles/s4156…
The study shows "that accounting for upper-end meltwater input in historical simulations significantly improves the data–model agreement on past changes in the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation, yielding a slowdown of 0.46 sverdrups per decade since 1950." /2
In our 2018 Nature article (Caesar et al.) we estimated ~3 Sv slowing since 1950, i.e. -0.4 Sv/decade, based on the observed 'cold blob' in the Atlantic west of Britain. /3 Image
Read 5 tweets
Nov 3, 2024
Latest NASA global temperature data.
Earth has never been hotter since Homo sapiens discovered agriculture in the early Holocene. Likely even since 120,000 years ago.
Fossil coal, oil and gas emissions caused it.
We need to stop making it worse.
Yes, we can if we want to. 🧵 Image
Here is the last 2023 years of data for CO2 (from Antarctic ice core data) and global temperature (from numerous sources of proxy data from around the world, such as sediment and ice cores). Check it out: pastglobalchanges.org/science/wg/2k-…Image
And here's global temperature for the past 24,000 years - since the last Ice Age! Earth is now warming 20 times faster than at the end of the last Ice Age.
(Ice ages are caused by the Earth orbit's Milankovich cycles - modern warming is not.)
Source: nature.com/articles/s4158…Image
Read 7 tweets
Oct 21, 2024
One feature of global warming is the *energy imbalance* of the Earth: we are absorbing more energy from the sun than we send back to space in form of thermal radiation.
If Earth’s climate were in equilibrium, these two numbers would exactly balance.
The main reason they don’t is the thermal inertia of the ocean. Because the ocean takes a long time to warm up, the warming of the surface ocean lags behind the warming of the land areas.
So the ocean remains cooler and therefore emits less thermal radiation.
93% of the energy imbalance is due to that relatively cool ocean.
If the ocean surface warming didn’t lag behind the land areas, the imbalance would thus largely disappear.
I’ve seen some crazy claims, like: if the ocean did not absorb most of the energy imbalance, then that amount of heat would end up in the atmosphere, heating the Earth by 36 degrees Celsius.
That’s not how this works.
The ocean with its large heat capacity and therefore large heat uptake causes most of the energy imbalance of our planet at a time of rapid global warming. If the ocean didn’t do that, the Earth would only take up a fraction of the heat it does now. It would be a little bit warmer (a few tenths of a degree C) but nothing like 36 C!
That misunderstanding of ocean thermal inertia, is linked to another one: That the Earth will keep warming for decades after we reach zero CO2 emissions, as the oceans catch up with warming. That’s also incorrect.
That idea is not fundamentally wrong, but there is a balancing effect: the CO2 uptake inertia. While the ocean continues warming for some decades, it will also continue taking up CO2 for some decades after we stopped emitting, because of a CO2 concentration imbalance between atmosphere and upper ocean. So the CO2 concentration will decline, and from the point where we reach zero emissions, the warming will likely stop right away.

carbonbrief.org/explainer-will…
A third misunderstanding (that one promoted by climate skeptics) is that we do not need to reduce our CO2 emissions to zero in order to stabilize the concentration, because the ocean takes up 25% of our emissions. However, that is primarily just due to a temporary imbalance and will stop after a few decades, just like the heat uptake will. Much of the increased CO2 will actually remain for many tens of thousands of years in the atmosphere (unless our descendants actively pull it out of the atmosphere).
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(